[CoDeP] the Bentham case

[Christopher Baum]

Jorge,

Thanks, but please note that this would be a toothless distinction. Once we
grant a RePEc archive code, the publisher is free to create as many series
within that archive as they choose. We have no way of accepting some series
and not others; the only recourse would be to cancel the archive code. So I
would respectfully request the committee to consider the publisher in a
yes/no fashion: should this publisher be granted a RePEc archive code, to
do with as they wish?

Thanks
Kit Baum


On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 2:19 AM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

>   Jorge Miguel Streb writes
>
> > As Marco points out, this is the only journal related to business in
> > the whole Bentham collection.
>
>   Well there is two brands, "Bentham" and "Bentham Open". I had
>   started with Bentham and found this to be the only. I checked the
>   journal list of "Bentham Open" right now. They have nothing that
>   one would call economics.
>
>   I suspect that following our investigation, we can recommend Kit to
>   tell them they can open an archive for "Technology Transfer and
>   Entrepreneurship" (TTE) papers. I doubt RePEc should take other
>   journals because of the subject, but that is Kit's decision at
>   this time. Let this recommondation goes into force unless we read
>   some objects by a committee member within 24 hours, say by
>   Wednesday Dec 14 02:00 UTC 2016.
>
>
>
>   Cheers,
>
>   Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                               skype:thomaskrichel
>



-- 
Kit Baum
Professor of Economics and Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill MA,
USA
DIW Research Fellow, Department of Macroeconomics, DIW Berlin, Berlin,
Germany
baum at bc.edu  |  http://ideas.repec.org/e/pba1.html
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/codep-run/attachments/20161213/04a14f2e/attachment.html>