[CoDeP] the Betham case

[Marco LiCalzi]

Perhaps we should call a vote, and pass the result to RePEc.

> On 19 Dec 2016, at 20:06, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
> 
>  Christopher Baum writes
> 
>> Has the vetting committee come to a clear decision on Bentham Open?
> 
>  The last case we looked at was indeed Bentham, not Bentham Open.
>  We did not see an econonomics-relevant journal in Bentham Open
>  as to investigate.
> 
>> I have been copied on several messages, and there does not seem to
>> be a consensus in those messages as to Bentham’s suitability. Please
>> advise.
> 
>  I thought my last message conveyed the state of our rather ad-hoc
>  play, that we don't have enough evidence on deceptive practices
>  at Bentham to exclude the single journal that we think is relavant
>  to economics.
> 
>  Sorry about the hand-waving, but this process is just starting.
> 
> -- 
> 
>  Cheers,
> 
>  Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                              skype:thomaskrichel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CoDeP-run mailing list
> CoDeP-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/codep-run