[CoDeP] the Betham case
Christopher Baum
kitbaum at icloud.com
Mon Dec 19 19:14:53 UTC 2016
OK, the same person requested archives on 9 Dec for Bentham Science Publishers ( http://benthamscience.com/journals-by-title/A/1/) and Bentham Open ( https://benthamopen.com/browse-by-title/A/1/). Do you advise that we should accept Bentham as a publisher?
Thanks
Kit
> On Dec 19, 2016, at 2:06 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>
> Christopher Baum writes
>
>> Has the vetting committee come to a clear decision on Bentham Open?
>
> The last case we looked at was indeed Bentham, not Bentham Open.
> We did not see an econonomics-relevant journal in Bentham Open
> as to investigate.
>
>> I have been copied on several messages, and there does not seem to
>> be a consensus in those messages as to Bentham’s suitability. Please
>> advise.
>
> I thought my last message conveyed the state of our rather ad-hoc
> play, that we don't have enough evidence on deceptive practices
> at Bentham to exclude the single journal that we think is relavant
> to economics.
>
> Sorry about the hand-waving, but this process is just starting.
>
> --
>
> Cheers,
>
> Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
> skype:thomaskrichel
More information about the CoDeP-run
mailing list