[cgiapp] Switching CGI::Snapp from Hash::FieldHash to Moo

[Ron Savage]

Hi Richard

Yes. The decision which way to jump is a complex one. Several times 
I've almost abandoned CGI::* myself and gone with Mojolicious.

Still, choice is good :-).

On 15/11/13 00:04, Richard Jones wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> I didn't switch to CGI::Snapp as I embraced Dancer after playing with
> Catalyst and finding it too much of a jump a the time. I wanted a more
> modern approach to web app development, having use CGI::App for many
> years, and Dancer came along at the right time. As you know D2 is a
> re-write using Moo, so I think you're probably going in the right
> direction. I now develop web apps exclusively with D2.
>
> On 14/11/2013 06:46, Ron Savage wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I've almost decided to switch the class builder in CGI::Snapp from
>> Hash::FieldHash to Moo.
>>
>> The point of the switch is that sub-classes can then use Moo and Moo::Role.
>>
>> Just before I do I'd like to know how much trouble that's going to be
>> for users (if any :-).
>>
>
>

-- 
Ron Savage
http://savage.net.au/