[cgiapp] TestApps

[Alex]

Even if I would delete the file, the namespace I had chosen for the .pm test
file would be registered for me. Search for CGIAPP_TestApp2 on cpan and you
will see what I mean.

I would like to avoid this namespace pollution, at least at this level, by
introducing a lower level namespace exactly for such things.

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cgiapp-bounces at lists.openlib.org
[mailto:cgiapp-bounces at lists.openlib.org] Im Auftrag von NP Bamber
Gesendet: Samstag, 17. Oktober 2009 19:02
An: cgiapp at lists.openlib.org
Betreff: [cgiapp] TestApps

Why do you need a test name space. Is this just to check the formatting of
the upload file? http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=596075 works reasonably well
for that. Also there is a  way in PAUSE of scheduling files for deletion.
That is a good thing as I am sure noone wants really old versions hanging
around for every module.


cgiapp-request at lists.openlib.org wrote:
> Send cgiapp mailing list submissions to
> 	cgiapp at lists.openlib.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	cgiapp-request at lists.openlib.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	cgiapp-owner at lists.openlib.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific 
> than "Re: Contents of cgiapp digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. test namespace for CGI::Application (Alex)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:47:05 +0200
> From: "Alex" <capfan at gmx.de>
> Subject: [cgiapp] test namespace for CGI::Application
> To: "'CGI Application'" <cgiapp at lists.openlib.org>
> Message-ID: <000c01ca4f06$67d06870$37713950$@de>
> Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"
>
> Dear all!
>
> I recently polluated another cpan root namespace by including a test 
> application in a dist. That's bad. I wonder if there isn't a test 
> namespace in the CGI::Application namespace itself. So anyone 
> releasing a plugin with a test application could use this namespace.
>
> CGI::Application::TestApps is what I was thinking of.
> What do you think of this?
>
> Regards, Alex
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cgiapp mailing list
> cgiapp at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp
>
>
> End of cgiapp Digest, Vol 25, Issue 8
> *************************************
>
>
>   


#####  CGI::Application community mailing list  ################
##                                                            ##
##  To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options,  ##
##  visit:  http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp    ##
##                                                            ##
##  Web archive:   http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/cgiapp/   ##
##  Wiki:          http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/                 ##
##                                                            ##
################################################################