[cgiapp] Class::MOP? Really?

[Michael Peters]

Ricardo SIGNES wrote:

> Is there any actual point to this change?  Do we have plans to support
> alternate inheritence hierarchies for CGI::Application?  Have any such been
> tested or planned?
> 
> This isn't a "hey, Class::MOP is the new hotness!" change, is it?

I think this was a "hey, Class::MOP is really cool. I bet it would make CGI::App
much simpler...oh wait. Look how slow everything got!". And now we also have
"Look how big everything got!".

-- 
Michael Peters
Developer
Plus Three, LP