[ArchEc] Developer contract for RePEc

[Chirag Anand]

Hi Thomas, thanks for confirming the terms, I will forward them to the
administration and get the contract done as soon as possible. Thanks.

On 10 January 2013 12:55, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>
>   Chirag Anand writes
>
>> I went through the FortLee document, and extracted out the major goals
>> of the project, and put them in the contracting terms. As far as we
>> are concerned, this will do for the next 6 months, but in the long
>> term we would have to come up with some thing other than the current
>> terms. Please take a look at it, and suggest whether we should change
>> anything there.
>
>   No these terms look good. As I see it we have a first phase where
>   we store tobis, then we store fobis. There are minor differences,
>   but both use the objcet store, so part of the code on templates can
>   be recycled from tobi to fobis. These are the file paths and the
>   lookup database.
>
>   At a second disucession on Skype, Rishab seemed to experience
>   problems with the concepts on fobi and tobis, the handles and
>   time. I revised the Fort Lee paper
>
> http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html
>
>   in the hope to make this clearer.
>
>   Cheers,
>
>   Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                       http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                                skype: thomaskrichel



-- 
Chirag Anand
http://atvariance.in