[ArchEc] Developer contract for RePEc

Chirag Anand anand.chirag at gmail.com
Wed Jan 9 04:22:39 CST 2013


Hi, did you get time to take a look at the terms? Can we finalise these?
Thanks.

On 31 December 2012 15:16, Chirag Anand <anand.chirag at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> I went through the FortLee document, and extracted out the major goals
> of the project, and put them in the contracting terms. As far as we
> are concerned, this will do for the next 6 months, but in the long
> term we would have to come up with some thing other than the current
> terms. Please take a look at it, and suggest whether we should change
> anything there.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On 28 December 2012 11:22, Chirag Anand <anand.chirag at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 28 December 2012 11:15, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>>>   Chirag Anand writes
>>>
>>>> We are not looking at hard deadlines, but say give us a list of
>>>> deliverables for the next 3-6 months as of now. That would do.
>>>
>>>   I am working on a plan, and then rethinking things and tossinng
>>>   things around. but I got until starting to put somthing into
>>>   HTML.
>>>
>>> http://openlib.org/home/krichel/work/fort_lee.html
>>>
>>>   This looks now much easier than the ideas I had two days
>>>   ago. I will do some more work on this tomorrow, as I will
>>>   spend much of the day offline.
>>
>> Okay that's great. I will extract something out of the current version
>> for contracting as of now. Will modify accordingly as when you change
>> the document.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> --
>> Chirag Anand
>> http://atvariance.in
>
>
>
> --
> Chirag Anand
> http://atvariance.in



-- 
Chirag Anand
http://atvariance.in



More information about the ArchEc-run mailing list