[ReDev] ReDIF-Perl at shuli

[Sune Karlsson]

There is Author-x-name-first and Author-x-name last where this could be bad.

Unrelated: Can the Reply-To header be set to the list?

/Sune

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ReDIF-dev [mailto:redif-dev-bounces at lists.openlib.org] On Behalf
> Of Jose Manuel Barrueco
> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 11:58 PM
> To: 'Christian Zimmermann'; zimmermann at stlouisfed.org; Thomas Krichel;
> Jose Manuel Barrueco; redif-dev at lists.openlib.org
> Subject: Re: [ReDev] ReDIF-Perl at shuli
> 
> 
>  I agree with that.
> 
> 
> > As X-* is user defined, why not simply carry it along unmodified?
> >
> > Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> > Economic Research
> > Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> > P.O. Box 442
> > St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> > https://ideas.repec.org/zimm/   @CZimm_economist
> >
> > On Thu, 16 Jun 2016, Sune Karlsson wrote:
> >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: CitEc-run [mailto:citec-run-bounces at lists.openlib.org] On
> Behalf
> > >> Of Jose Manuel Barrueco
> > >> Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2016 8:05 PM
> > >> To: Thomas Krichel; krichel at openlib.org; CitEc List
> > >> Subject: Re: [CitEc] ReDIF-Perl at shuli
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>>  adnetec at shuli:~$ rere RePEc/remo/per/pers/s/psc418.rdf
> > >>>>
> > >>>>  the output is not utf8
> > >>>
> > >>>   Well rere is a very old executable.
> > >>
> > >>  well, this doesn't seem to be a good answer :) any way, I get the
> same
> > >> result when I use the perl module.
> > >
> > > Why should the output be UTF-8? It should ideally be whatever
> character set your console uses.
> > >
> > > Or is there a use for rere other than seeing the pretty printed
> content of a template?
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>>> With the new versions, it seems the xml tags are
> > >>>> removed in the output so, the references can't be processed.
> > >>>
> > >>>   Yes. I was aware of that issue. I suspect it came
> > >>>   from changes proposed by Sune, who does not use
> > >>>   this data. I am not sure how to deal with this.
> > >>>
> > >>>   I think we need discussion on RePEc run or a special
> > >>>   list to deal with ReDIF.
> > >>
> > >>  Any idea about how to revert to the previous status in the
> meanwhile..
> > >>
> > >
> > > I think this is a quite old change in behavior. Version 2.69 added
> removal of html tags (with HTML::Strip) and I presume this also removes
> the XML markup. 2.69 is from 2012.
> > >
> > > There could be an option to not strip out the html (in the easiest
> implementation this would then also not decode html entities).
> Alternatively the X-Ref attribute could be special-cased to not strip
> the html in the value .
> > >
> > > /Sune
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> José Manuel Barrueco                   <barrueco at uv.es>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> CitEc-run mailing list
> > >> CitEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> > >> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/citec-run
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > ReDIF-dev mailing list
> > > ReDIF-dev at lists.openlib.org
> > > http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/redif-dev
> > >
> 
> 
> --
> 
> --
> José Manuel Barrueco                   <barrueco at uv.es>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ReDIF-dev mailing list
> ReDIF-dev at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/redif-dev