[RAS] APU, citations

[Jose Manuel Barrueco]

 	It seems to be fixed now, the number of claimed citations is 
returning to normality:

adnetec at sopri:~$ ll ras-exports/*2012-09*
-rw-r--r-- 1 adnetec adnetec   485 Sep  2 07:28 
ras-exports/cit_events.2012-09-01
-rw-r--r-- 1 adnetec adnetec   471 Sep  3 07:28 
ras-exports/cit_events.2012-09-02
-rw-r--r-- 1 adnetec adnetec 15028 Sep  4 07:28 
ras-exports/cit_events.2012-09-03
-rw-r--r-- 1 adnetec adnetec 90484 Sep  5 07:28 
ras-exports/cit_events.2012-09-04
adnetec at sopri:~$

 	Thanks Ivan!


On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, 'Christian Zimmermann' wrote:

> On Tue, 4 Sep 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> I do not remember many of the details of the citations processing
>> workflow (within RAS and between CitEc and RAS).
>> 
>> But yes, while APU (automatic profile update) is not running, the
>> identified citations are not being added to profiles. I'll try to
>> restore APU now.
>
> Good. Make sure to tell Dan how you do it, so that he can document it.
>
>> 
>>> But a bigger reason seems to be that citations do not make it to RAS. We
>>> checked the tables, and the numbers of records there look healthy. Thus it
>>> seems the processing to the user pages is somehow deficient. Could this be
>>> related to APU currently not running?
>> 
>> what is "processing to the user pages"?
>
> I meant whatever is the process that bring the suggested citations to the 
> user profiles.
>
>> 
>> -ivan
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Christian Zimmermann
>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>> I am with Jose, and we are trying to figure a few things on RAS. One is 
>>> why
>>> the citations numbers never coincide between RAS and CitEc. But there 
>>> seems
>>> to be urgent stuff.
>>> 
>>> Only 2000 citations have been added to CitEc last month. Part of the 
>>> reason
>>> is likely that magic sessions have not been running (and they still are 
>>> not)
>>> which reduced traffic to RAS and thus citation claims.
>>> 
>>> But a bigger reason seems to be that citations do not make it to RAS. We
>>> checked the tables, and the numbers of records there look healthy. Thus it
>>> seems the processing to the user pages is somehow deficient. Could this be
>>> related to APU currently not running?
>>> 
>>> The apu_queue table has as of now 87 records, and I do not think they have
>>> been processed. And many more should be in queue.
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>>> Economic Research
>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> P.O. Box 442
>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>> 
>
> -- 
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>
>


---
José Manuel Barrueco
Servei de Biblioteques i Documentació
Universitat de València

Tlf: +34963864756
http://www.uv.es/=barrueco