From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Feb  2 10:51:33 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 10:51:33 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] open sessions
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021050400.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I notice that there are many open sessions on RAS, some of them now open 
for days. How can I force them closed?

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Feb  2 12:11:22 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 20:11:22 +0200
Subject: [RAS] open sessions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021050400.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021050400.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQ6XT15FQnyW8SreTZYxJTHdZQVO5=xzWpQrs+LgPZhdg@mail.gmail.com>

Are those new-user type sessions? or user type?

-i

On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> I notice that there are many open sessions on RAS, some of them now open
> for days. How can I force them closed?
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120202/9c33808f/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Feb  2 12:46:10 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:46:10 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] open sessions
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQ6XT15FQnyW8SreTZYxJTHdZQVO5=xzWpQrs+LgPZhdg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021050400.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ6XT15FQnyW8SreTZYxJTHdZQVO5=xzWpQrs+LgPZhdg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021245360.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

The one I noticed are users who registered, confirmed, logged back in. 
There may be others.

On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Are those new-user type sessions? or user type?
>
> -i
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
> zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
>> I notice that there are many open sessions on RAS, some of them now open
>> for days. How can I force them closed?
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Feb  2 18:52:53 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 18:52:53 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] open sessions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021245360.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021050400.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ6XT15FQnyW8SreTZYxJTHdZQVO5=xzWpQrs+LgPZhdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021245360.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021836350.27930@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Examples:

carlosalberto.carrasco at ehu.es
a.candido at campus.fct.unl.pt

May this have to do with the fact that updates do not seem to happen, 
approx since Saturday?

On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, 'Christian Zimmermann' wrote:

> The one I noticed are users who registered, confirmed, logged back in. There 
> may be others.
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>>  Are those new-user type sessions? or user type?
>>
>>  -i
>>
>>  On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
>>  zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> 
>> >  I notice that there are many open sessions on RAS, some of them now open
>> >  for days. How can I force them closed?
>> > 
>> >  --
>> >  Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> >  Economic Research
>> >  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> >  P.O. Box 442
>> >  St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> >  http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>> > 
>> >  ______________________________**_________________
>> >  RAS-run mailing list
>> >  RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> >  http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>> > 
>> 
>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Feb  3 01:00:54 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:00:54 +0200
Subject: [RAS] open sessions
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021836350.27930@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021050400.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ6XT15FQnyW8SreTZYxJTHdZQVO5=xzWpQrs+LgPZhdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021245360.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021836350.27930@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQuO+io8hhdz1wPa8WXA26N0B9DWs+fDtrNau=NdPMPhQ@mail.gmail.com>

Oh-oh. You are right. When we had the old nebka troubles (mail sent from),
initially i went to the new nebka and have disabled all major cronjobs
there. And then i forgot about it.

-ivan

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> Examples:
>
> carlosalberto.carrasco at ehu.es
> a.candido at campus.fct.unl.pt
>
> May this have to do with the fact that updates do not seem to happen,
> approx since Saturday?
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, 'Christian Zimmermann' wrote:
>
>  The one I noticed are users who registered, confirmed, logged back in.
>> There may be others.
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>   Are those new-user type sessions? or user type?
>>>
>>>  -i
>>>
>>>  On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
>>>  zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> >  I notice that there are many open sessions on RAS, some of them now
>>> open
>>> >  for days. How can I force them closed?
>>> > >  --
>>> >  Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>>> >  Economic Research
>>> >  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> >  P.O. Box 442
>>> >  St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> >  http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>> > >  ______________________________****_________________
>>> >  RAS-run mailing list
>>> >  RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> >  http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-****bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>> <**http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120203/57a5a128/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Feb  3 01:24:53 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 09:24:53 +0200
Subject: [RAS] open sessions
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQuO+io8hhdz1wPa8WXA26N0B9DWs+fDtrNau=NdPMPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021050400.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ6XT15FQnyW8SreTZYxJTHdZQVO5=xzWpQrs+LgPZhdg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021245360.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202021836350.27930@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQuO+io8hhdz1wPa8WXA26N0B9DWs+fDtrNau=NdPMPhQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTGGNJKaP1WYt8e=bdm9OLWz53de11K9oaLGj=Ve-0-8A@mail.gmail.com>

I mean I've restored them now. Sorry for this.

-i

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Oh-oh. You are right. When we had the old nebka troubles (mail sent from),
> initially i went to the new nebka and have disabled all major cronjobs
> there. And then i forgot about it.
>
> -ivan
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 2:52 AM, Christian Zimmermann <
> zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
>> Examples:
>>
>> carlosalberto.carrasco at ehu.es
>> a.candido at campus.fct.unl.pt
>>
>> May this have to do with the fact that updates do not seem to happen,
>> approx since Saturday?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, 'Christian Zimmermann' wrote:
>>
>>  The one I noticed are users who registered, confirmed, logged back in.
>>> There may be others.
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>
>>>   Are those new-user type sessions? or user type?
>>>>
>>>>  -i
>>>>
>>>>  On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 6:51 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
>>>>  zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >  I notice that there are many open sessions on RAS, some of them now
>>>> open
>>>> >  for days. How can I force them closed?
>>>> > >  --
>>>> >  Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>>>> >  Economic Research
>>>> >  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>>> >  P.O. Box 442
>>>> >  St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>>> >  http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>>> > >  ______________________________****_________________
>>>> >  RAS-run mailing list
>>>> >  RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>> >  http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-****bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>>> <**http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120203/fd0b4c86/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Fri Feb  3 07:30:48 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 07:30:48 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/events_archiving (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202030730240.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I must say there is some humor in this warning.

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 01:37:02 -0600
From: Cron Daemon <root at nebka.stlouisfed.org>
To: aras at nebka.stlouisfed.org
Subject: Cron <aras at nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/events_archiving

probably you should run archiving more often (1/47357)


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Feb  3 10:53:55 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2012 18:53:55 +0200
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/events_archiving
	(fwd)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202030730240.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202030730240.30984@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRy4cnQdc3u_QWpWrKGvEykHqjNhKY39i4RiSYTXEAVMQ@mail.gmail.com>

:) you are welcome.

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> I must say there is some humor in this warning.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120203/ac61c13b/attachment-0001.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Feb 20 15:46:17 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 15:46:17 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] error (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202201545560.30789@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

First time I see such an error. What happened?

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:15:44 -0500
From: Larry Blume <lb19 at cornell.edu>
To: authors at repec.org
Subject: error

I tried to add something to my list of publications, and got the following
error:

$VAR1 = {
           'sid' => 'cnew22',
           'url-about' => 'http://ideas.repec.org/s/pal/dofeco.html',
           'id' => 'repec:pal:dofeco',
           'type' => 'series',
           'title' => 'The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics'


I co-edited this title.  Can you add it or tell me how to?
Thanks
--Larry Blume


____________________________________
Goldwin Smith Professor of Economics &
Professor of Information Science,
Cornell University
Visiting Research Professor, IHS Vienna
External Professor, Santa Fe Institute
http://www.santafe.edu/~leb


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Feb 20 22:47:57 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 07:47:57 +0300
Subject: [RAS] error (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202201545560.30789@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202201545560.30789@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTpe+YqQmcgHhkHnpc3kYkO0+cRhfTt+yjkDT1_AfwwRw@mail.gmail.com>

Ooops! Suspicious claim detection assumed, that every item has some
authors or some editors. But series do not. Now fixed and it should
work for this guy.

-ivan

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> First time I see such an error. What happened?
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2012 16:15:44 -0500
> From: Larry Blume <lb19 at cornell.edu>
> To: authors at repec.org
> Subject: error
>
> I tried to add something to my list of publications, and got the following
> error:
>
> $VAR1 = {
> ? ? ? ? ?'sid' => 'cnew22',
> ? ? ? ? ?'url-about' => 'http://ideas.repec.org/s/pal/dofeco.html',
> ? ? ? ? ?'id' => 'repec:pal:dofeco',
> ? ? ? ? ?'type' => 'series',
> ? ? ? ? ?'title' => 'The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics'
>
>
> I co-edited this title. ?Can you add it or tell me how to?
> Thanks
> --Larry Blume
>
>
> ____________________________________
> Goldwin Smith Professor of Economics &
> Professor of Information Science,
> Cornell University
> Visiting Research Professor, IHS Vienna
> External Professor, Santa Fe Institute
> http://www.santafe.edu/~leb
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Feb 24 14:32:06 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:32:06 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>

Christian and everyone,

I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
bring a number of developed features to the live service:

 - affiliation shares (including in ReDIF export)
 - research and citations suggestion count numbers in the top navigation
 - deceased person support and deceased date in the ReDIF profile
 - improved support for multi-profile accounts (accounts that have more
that one personal record in it)
 - ability to create and maintain a large account for the deceased person
profiles
 - various minor fixes for HTML, javascript and other aspects

The version that is currently on http://ras.openlib.org/ has all these
changes, and has been tested to the best of my ability, but it could use
more of it. If you have some time to test and report any issues found,
we'll be grateful.


Ivan
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120224/0ecff394/attachment.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Feb 24 14:53:38 2012
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 21:53:38 +0100
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120224205338.GA23917@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
> bring a number of developed features to the live service:

  I want to move the test site off holda to rishu. I suggest working
  on that when the new version is life.

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Fri Feb 24 15:05:29 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:05:29 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <20120224205338.GA23917@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120224205338.GA23917@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202241504000.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Thomas Krichel wrote:

>  Ivan Kurmanov writes
>
>> I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
>> bring a number of developed features to the live service:

I am good with that. Dan should also be back by Monday.

>
>  I want to move the test site off holda to rishu. I suggest working
>  on that when the new version is life.

Could this wait a little? We are behind schedule for the RAS upgrades. 
Ivan needs to concentrate on that first.

>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Fri Feb 24 15:12:32 2012
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 15:12:32 -0600
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202241504000.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120224205338.GA23917@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202241504000.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmXPc12acVmWWNE0A5Q-ob_ZHUo2OCcAkOL7TRFpJR-jjA@mail.gmail.com>

I'm willing to assist at anytime.  Let me know if you need me.

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Thomas Krichel wrote:
>
>   Ivan Kurmanov writes
>>
>>  I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
>>> bring a number of developed features to the live service:
>>>
>>
> I am good with that. Dan should also be back by Monday.
>
>
>
>>  I want to move the test site off holda to rishu. I suggest working
>>  on that when the new version is life.
>>
>
> Could this wait a little? We are behind schedule for the RAS upgrades.
> Ivan needs to concentrate on that first.
>
>
>
>>  Cheers,
>>
>>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/**krichel<http://openlib.org/home/krichel>
>>                                     http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>>                                              skype: thomaskrichel
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>
>>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120224/9b313673/attachment.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Feb 24 15:14:15 2012
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2012 22:14:15 +0100
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202241504000.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120224205338.GA23917@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202241504000.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20120224211415.GB23917@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes
> On Fri, 24 Feb 2012, Thomas Krichel wrote:
> 
> > Ivan Kurmanov writes
> >
> >>I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
> >>bring a number of developed features to the live service:
> 
> I am good with that. Dan should also be back by Monday.
> 
> >
> > I want to move the test site off holda to rishu. I suggest working
> > on that when the new version is life.
> 
> Could this wait a little? We are behind schedule for the RAS
> upgrades. Ivan needs to concentrate on that first.

  I don't see why moving testing machine would delay us for more
  than a day.

  Ivan has rightly complained the testing box was slow. He will
  get a better box now.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Feb 24 21:27:03 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 05:27:03 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CA+gnGmXPc12acVmWWNE0A5Q-ob_ZHUo2OCcAkOL7TRFpJR-jjA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120224205338.GA23917@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202241504000.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CA+gnGmXPc12acVmWWNE0A5Q-ob_ZHUo2OCcAkOL7TRFpJR-jjA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTCk1xGCNNTY=3iwCvQVSqYx2hdydCcuPdT5Ln4hrhiag@mail.gmail.com>

Dan, thank you. I don't think i'll need your help this time. There are no
infrastructure changes needed, as far as i remember (and know).

ivan

On Friday, February 24, 2012, Dan Hayes wrote:

> I'm willing to assist at anytime.  Let me know if you need me.
>
>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120225/6a65f1e4/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Feb 27 05:10:30 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 14:10:30 +0300
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkR8Raj6PMu09aHcNUj+wqtb+Pr4W6zDHJW+k+rCSQ6a_g@mail.gmail.com>

I am ready for upgrade anytime now. I can do it today. I can do it
tomorrow.

Only ACIS software will be upgraded, at least that's the intent now. No
perl modules, no libraries, no database changes.

I'll wait for folks on RePEc-run to answer about the affiliations data in
ReDIF templates and for a green light from Christian.

-ivan

On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Christian and everyone,
>
> I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
> bring a number of developed features to the live service:
>
>  - affiliation shares (including in ReDIF export)
>  - research and citations suggestion count numbers in the top navigation
>  - deceased person support and deceased date in the ReDIF profile
>  - improved support for multi-profile accounts (accounts that have more
> that one personal record in it)
>  - ability to create and maintain a large account for the deceased person
> profiles
>  - various minor fixes for HTML, javascript and other aspects
>
> The version that is currently on http://ras.openlib.org/ has all these
> changes, and has been tested to the best of my ability, but it could use
> more of it. If you have some time to test and report any issues found,
> we'll be grateful.
>
>
> Ivan
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120227/58abf82f/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Feb 27 08:24:56 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2012 08:24:56 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkR8Raj6PMu09aHcNUj+wqtb+Pr4W6zDHJW+k+rCSQ6a_g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR8Raj6PMu09aHcNUj+wqtb+Pr4W6zDHJW+k+rCSQ6a_g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202270824340.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I am good.

On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> I am ready for upgrade anytime now. I can do it today. I can do it
> tomorrow.
>
> Only ACIS software will be upgraded, at least that's the intent now. No
> perl modules, no libraries, no database changes.
>
> I'll wait for folks on RePEc-run to answer about the affiliations data in
> ReDIF templates and for a green light from Christian.
>
> -ivan
>
> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Christian and everyone,
>>
>> I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
>> bring a number of developed features to the live service:
>>
>>  - affiliation shares (including in ReDIF export)
>>  - research and citations suggestion count numbers in the top navigation
>>  - deceased person support and deceased date in the ReDIF profile
>>  - improved support for multi-profile accounts (accounts that have more
>> that one personal record in it)
>>  - ability to create and maintain a large account for the deceased person
>> profiles
>>  - various minor fixes for HTML, javascript and other aspects
>>
>> The version that is currently on http://ras.openlib.org/ has all these
>> changes, and has been tested to the best of my ability, but it could use
>> more of it. If you have some time to test and report any issues found,
>> we'll be grateful.
>>
>>
>> Ivan
>>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 10:13:33 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:13:33 +0300
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTbi6ttTPB+wG8UiJJL_cjVFrWVHBEEnnq=XEhZJeJ2HA@mail.gmail.com>

As I've just found out, my mails do not reach repec-run, so I'm resending
them here.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org>


I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i have
warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is going to
happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.

The affiliation data in the template may look like this:

Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby

But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:

Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
? Faculty of Economics
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Share: 30
Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political Studies
(IISEPS)
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
Workplace-Share: 70

This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.

Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted in the
new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if we should
postpone the upgrade.

-ivan





On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person templates
> with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure you have the
> redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in ReDIF-perl version 2.66,
> in place, or the new templates will be rejected.
>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RePEc-run mailing list
> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/**mailman/listinfo/repec-run<http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120228/ee45f940/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 10:13:51 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:13:51 +0300
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM
Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org>


Sorry, the higher-share affiliation would come first, actually. So, it may
rather be like this after the upgrade:

Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
? Faculty of Economics
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Share: 70
Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political Studies
(IISEPS)
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
Workplace-Share: 30

-i

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:

> I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i have
> warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is going to
> happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.
>
> The affiliation data in the template may look like this:
>
> Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
> Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>
> But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:
>
> Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
> ? Faculty of Economics
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
> Workplace-Share: 30
> Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
> Studies (IISEPS)
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
> Workplace-Share: 70
>
> This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.
>
> Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted in the
> new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if we should
> postpone the upgrade.
>
> -ivan
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
> zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
>> The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person templates
>> with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure you have the
>> redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in ReDIF-perl version 2.66,
>> in place, or the new templates will be rejected.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> RePEc-run mailing list
>> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/**mailman/listinfo/repec-run<http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120228/761d7ae0/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 10:14:01 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:14:01 +0300
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTbi6ttTPB+wG8UiJJL_cjVFrWVHBEEnnq=XEhZJeJ2HA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTbi6ttTPB+wG8UiJJL_cjVFrWVHBEEnnq=XEhZJeJ2HA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkROc70BgtY-Pw4J39PvJ0TiX3j93xkVeABRM7Q2BrXTwQ@mail.gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:13 PM
Subject: Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
To: RAS-RUN <ras-run at lists.openlib.org>, ACIS technical <
acis-tech at lists.openlib.org>


As I've just found out, my mails do not reach repec-run, so I'm resending
them here.


---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM
Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org>


I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i have
warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is going to
happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.

The affiliation data in the template may look like this:

Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby

But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:

Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
? Faculty of Economics
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Share: 30
Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political Studies
(IISEPS)
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
Workplace-Share: 70

This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.

Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted in the
new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if we should
postpone the upgrade.

-ivan





On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person templates
> with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure you have the
> redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in ReDIF-perl version 2.66,
> in place, or the new templates will be rejected.
>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RePEc-run mailing list
> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/**mailman/listinfo/repec-run<http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120228/50bfed3a/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 10:15:04 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:15:04 +0300
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRZ=WoAecUL4c-q4A-JzQXPhU=S23-yEC+ni-5btkwjog@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <4F4B8578.2070508@oru.se>
 <CAHGiUkRZ=WoAecUL4c-q4A-JzQXPhU=S23-yEC+ni-5btkwjog@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTSpvzoUDBuYc8WAjfy1w9Lqv3=oBvx3LnfZo8Aisw3Hw@mail.gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:00 PM
Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org>


I've done a new release of ReDIF perl which includes the updated
JELcodes.pm:

http://all.repec.org/ReDIF-perl/ReDIF-perl-2.67.tar.gz

-i


On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Sune Karlsson <Sune.Karlsson at oru.se> wrote:

> Done! Note that the JELcodes.pm file is out of date with several new codes
> missing. Run updatejel.pl to get a fresh version.
>
> /Sune
>
>
> On 2012-02-21 17:23, 'Christian Zimmermann' wrote:
>
>> The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person templates
>> with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure you have the
>> redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in ReDIF-perl version
>> 2.66, in place, or the new templates will be rejected.
>>
>>
>>
> --
> Sune Karlsson
> Professor of Statistics
> Handelsh?gskolan/Swedish Business School
> Dekanus/Dean Fakulteten f?r ekonomi-, natur- och teknikvetenskap
> ?rebro University, SE-70182 ?rebro, Sweden
> Phone +46 19 301257/301415
> http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_**karlsson <http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_karlsson>
> http://econpapers.repec.org/**RAS/pka1.htm<http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pka1.htm>
>
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RePEc-run mailing list
> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/**mailman/listinfo/repec-run<http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120228/a9fa19a1/attachment-0001.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 10:25:25 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:25:25 +0300
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202270824340.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR8Raj6PMu09aHcNUj+wqtb+Pr4W6zDHJW+k+rCSQ6a_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202270824340.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkT0JSct4MzDs9jewyP1YMBAT8fmbQvgVjAxvCmG0F9hmQ@mail.gmail.com>

Upgraded.

All new features are now live.

As a proof, if you want some, here is my updated (untrue) profile:

http://authors.repec.org/pro/pku9/

-ivan

On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> I am good.
>
>
> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>  I am ready for upgrade anytime now. I can do it today. I can do it
>> tomorrow.
>>
>> Only ACIS software will be upgraded, at least that's the intent now. No
>> perl modules, no libraries, no database changes.
>>
>> I'll wait for folks on RePEc-run to answer about the affiliations data in
>> ReDIF templates and for a green light from Christian.
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  Christian and everyone,
>>>
>>> I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
>>> bring a number of developed features to the live service:
>>>
>>>  - affiliation shares (including in ReDIF export)
>>>  - research and citations suggestion count numbers in the top navigation
>>>  - deceased person support and deceased date in the ReDIF profile
>>>  - improved support for multi-profile accounts (accounts that have more
>>> that one personal record in it)
>>>  - ability to create and maintain a large account for the deceased person
>>> profiles
>>>  - various minor fixes for HTML, javascript and other aspects
>>>
>>> The version that is currently on http://ras.openlib.org/ has all these
>>> changes, and has been tested to the best of my ability, but it could use
>>> more of it. If you have some time to test and report any issues found,
>>> we'll be grateful.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120228/b64416ef/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Feb 28 10:28:24 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:28:24 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkT0JSct4MzDs9jewyP1YMBAT8fmbQvgVjAxvCmG0F9hmQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR8Raj6PMu09aHcNUj+wqtb+Pr4W6zDHJW+k+rCSQ6a_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202270824340.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT0JSct4MzDs9jewyP1YMBAT8fmbQvgVjAxvCmG0F9hmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281027550.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Excellent. Thanks.

I have a meeting now, will test thereafter and post on the blog.

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Upgraded.
>
> All new features are now live.
>
> As a proof, if you want some, here is my updated (untrue) profile:
>
> http://authors.repec.org/pro/pku9/
>
> -ivan
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
> zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
>> I am good.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>  I am ready for upgrade anytime now. I can do it today. I can do it
>>> tomorrow.
>>>
>>> Only ACIS software will be upgraded, at least that's the intent now. No
>>> perl modules, no libraries, no database changes.
>>>
>>> I'll wait for folks on RePEc-run to answer about the affiliations data in
>>> ReDIF templates and for a green light from Christian.
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>> On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 11:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>  Christian and everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I want to make an upgrade of RAS on Mon-Tue next week. The upgrade should
>>>> bring a number of developed features to the live service:
>>>>
>>>>  - affiliation shares (including in ReDIF export)
>>>>  - research and citations suggestion count numbers in the top navigation
>>>>  - deceased person support and deceased date in the ReDIF profile
>>>>  - improved support for multi-profile accounts (accounts that have more
>>>> that one personal record in it)
>>>>  - ability to create and maintain a large account for the deceased person
>>>> profiles
>>>>  - various minor fixes for HTML, javascript and other aspects
>>>>
>>>> The version that is currently on http://ras.openlib.org/ has all these
>>>> changes, and has been tested to the best of my ability, but it could use
>>>> more of it. If you have some time to test and report any issues found,
>>>> we'll be grateful.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ivan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 10:35:52 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 19:35:52 +0300
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade
In-Reply-To: <C6FE754A-17B0-4EC6-B73B-6FB0AF465F67@email.bc.edu>
References: <CAHGiUkSArKQoiixsDaX_K2QMb7Ce-jGjM5fO9zAEcLthv4Wo4A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR8Raj6PMu09aHcNUj+wqtb+Pr4W6zDHJW+k+rCSQ6a_g@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202270824340.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT0JSct4MzDs9jewyP1YMBAT8fmbQvgVjAxvCmG0F9hmQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281027550.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <C6FE754A-17B0-4EC6-B73B-6FB0AF465F67@email.bc.edu>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSroG=CD0RH_yM9urc6KOjdpToHgVaHUvF5VodfVAhaEA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Christopher Baum <kit.baum at bc.edu> wrote:

> Looks very nice!
>
> Ivan is remarkably active for someone metabolically challenged.
>

:)


>
> Kit
>
> Research Papers in Economics (RePEc)
> http://repec.org
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120228/d8023a29/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Feb 28 11:45:45 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 11:45:45 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log
In-Reply-To: <201202281735.q1SHZ2uw024012@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
References: <201202281735.q1SHZ2uw024012@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281145260.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Ivan,

not sure you are getting this:

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Cron Daemon wrote:

> no tempfile defined at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session/SOldUser.pm line 309.
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 12:53:34 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 20:53:34 +0200
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
	/home/aras/acis/clean-up.log
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281145260.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <201202281735.q1SHZ2uw024012@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281145260.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRT1e8LwYVBE1e2fWqazU3UG_vRNE=KZrUrKYBLtkS9Aw@mail.gmail.com>

Oh well... That's an issue. And I'm not sure how to fix it now. But it
would go away after a short while, anyway. But it may have actually
affected those users, whose sessions were open at the time of the upgrade.
oh well. Thinking.

-i

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> Ivan,
>
> not sure you are getting this:
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Cron Daemon wrote:
>
>  no tempfile defined at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**Session/SOldUser.pm
>> line 309.
>>
>>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120228/54c609ff/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Feb 28 12:54:29 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 12:54:29 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRT1e8LwYVBE1e2fWqazU3UG_vRNE=KZrUrKYBLtkS9Aw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <201202281735.q1SHZ2uw024012@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281145260.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRT1e8LwYVBE1e2fWqazU3UG_vRNE=KZrUrKYBLtkS9Aw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281253560.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I just got another one of those. 3 so far.

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Oh well... That's an issue. And I'm not sure how to fix it now. But it
> would go away after a short while, anyway. But it may have actually
> affected those users, whose sessions were open at the time of the upgrade.
> oh well. Thinking.
>
> -i
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
> zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
>> Ivan,
>>
>> not sure you are getting this:
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Cron Daemon wrote:
>>
>>  no tempfile defined at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**Session/SOldUser.pm
>>> line 309.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Feb 28 16:07:25 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 01:07:25 +0300
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
	/home/aras/acis/clean-up.log
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281253560.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <201202281735.q1SHZ2uw024012@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281145260.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRT1e8LwYVBE1e2fWqazU3UG_vRNE=KZrUrKYBLtkS9Aw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281253560.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQ4hjPUyWGiHALEjeSjN-kz6=g8pz4d9LCz76HqtqLGwA@mail.gmail.com>

I have temporarily disabled the bin/clean-up cronjob, added some
backward-compatibility fixes, and now have re-enabled the cronjob back.

I hope what I've done is enough, but I'm not sure about this.

But at least it now has closed successfully the sessions that it needed to
close.

-i

On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> I just got another one of those. 3 so far.
>
>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>  Oh well... That's an issue. And I'm not sure how to fix it now. But it
>> would go away after a short while, anyway. But it may have actually
>> affected those users, whose sessions were open at the time of the upgrade.
>> oh well. Thinking.
>>
>> -i
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
>> zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>
>>  Ivan,
>>>
>>> not sure you are getting this:
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Cron Daemon wrote:
>>>
>>>  no tempfile defined at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/***
>>> *Session/SOldUser.pm
>>>
>>>  line 309.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>>> Economic Research
>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> P.O. Box 442
>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>>
>>> ______________________________****_________________
>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-****bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>> <**http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120229/6d2f3798/attachment.html>

From Sune.Karlsson at oru.se  Tue Feb 28 16:41:01 2012
From: Sune.Karlsson at oru.se (Sune Karlsson)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:41:01 +0100
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>

I am not entierly happy about the way this is done. It would have been 
good with some advance notice before an incompatible change is made to 
ReDIF.

While the changes to RAS has been discussed (I believe only on RAS-RUN) 
I can find no discussion of the changes to ReDIF.

To make things worse we now have two different file formats in play at 
the same time. When will the conversion to the new format be complete?

I don't like the arrows in Workplace-Name.

/Sune

Ivan Kurmanov skrev 2012-02-28 17:13:
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Ivan Kurmanov* <duraley at gmail.com <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>>
> Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM
> Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
> To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org
> <mailto:repec-run at lists.openlib.org>>
>
>
> Sorry, the higher-share affiliation would come first, actually. So, it
> may rather be like this after the upgrade:
>
> Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
> ? Faculty of Economics
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
> Workplace-Share: 70
> Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
> Studies (IISEPS)
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
> Workplace-Share: 30
>
> -i
>
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com
> <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i
>     have warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is
>     going to happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.
>
>     The affiliation data in the template may look like this:
>
>     Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>     Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>
>     But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:
>
>     Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>     ? Faculty of Economics
>     Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>     Workplace-Share: 30
>     Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
>     Studies (IISEPS)
>     Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>     Workplace-Share: 70
>
>     This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.
>
>     Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted
>     in the new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if
>     we should postpone the upgrade.
>
>     -ivan
>
>
>
>
>
>     On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>     <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org <mailto:zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>> wrote:
>
>         The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person
>         templates with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure
>         you have the redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in
>         ReDIF-perl version 2.66, in place, or the new templates will be
>         rejected.
>
>
>         --
>         Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>         Economic Research
>         Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>         P.O. Box 442
>         St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>         http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
>         _________________________________________________
>         RePEc-run mailing list
>         RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org <mailto:RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org>
>         http://lists.openlib.org/__mailman/listinfo/repec-run
>         <http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run

-- 
Sune Karlsson
Professor of Statistics
Handelsh?gskolan/?rebro University School of Business
Dekanus/Dean Fakulteten f?r ekonomi-, natur- och teknikvetenskap
?rebro University, SE-70182 ?rebro, Sweden
Phone +46 19 301257/301415
http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_karlsson
http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pka1.htm


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Feb 28 16:44:27 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:44:27 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/events_archiving (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281643570.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

are these the three problematic sessiosn from before?

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:37:04 -0600
From: Cron Daemon <root at nebka.stlouisfed.org>
To: aras at nebka.stlouisfed.org
Subject: Cron <aras at nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/events_archiving

no humanname in session's about; skipping session fd1f4229
no humanname in session's about; skipping session 7716213c
no humanname in session's about; skipping session 9f47394c


From krichel at openlib.org  Tue Feb 28 16:47:04 2012
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 23:47:04 +0100
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
Message-ID: <20120228224704.GE24541@openlib.org>

  Sune Karlsson writes

> While the changes to RAS has been discussed (I believe only on
> RAS-RUN) I can find no discussion of the changes to ReDIF.
 
  If this is nto documented in the ReDIF documentation, it is 
  not legal. 

  I did not see any request to change the documentation recently.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Feb 28 16:47:20 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 16:47:20 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281645300.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

The change to ReDIF was made back in November and announced.

The new workplace cluster type is easily identified with the 
workplace-institution field. The old one used workplace-organization.

On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Sune Karlsson wrote:

> I am not entierly happy about the way this is done. It would have been good 
> with some advance notice before an incompatible change is made to ReDIF.
>
> While the changes to RAS has been discussed (I believe only on RAS-RUN) I can 
> find no discussion of the changes to ReDIF.
>
> To make things worse we now have two different file formats in play at the 
> same time. When will the conversion to the new format be complete?
>
> I don't like the arrows in Workplace-Name.
>
> /Sune
>
> Ivan Kurmanov skrev 2012-02-28 17:13:
>> 
>>
>>  ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>  From: *Ivan Kurmanov* <duraley at gmail.com <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>>
>>  Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM
>>  Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
>>  To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org
>>  <mailto:repec-run at lists.openlib.org>>
>> 
>>
>>  Sorry, the higher-share affiliation would come first, actually. So, it
>>  may rather be like this after the upgrade:
>>
>>  Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>>  ? Faculty of Economics
>>  Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>  Workplace-Share: 70
>>  Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
>>  Studies (IISEPS)
>>  Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>  Workplace-Share: 30
>>
>>  -i
>>
>>  On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com
>>  <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>      I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i
>>      have warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is
>>      going to happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.
>>
>>      The affiliation data in the template may look like this:
>>
>>      Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>      Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>
>>      But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:
>>
>>      Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>>      ? Faculty of Economics
>>      Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>      Workplace-Share: 30
>>      Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
>>      Studies (IISEPS)
>>      Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>      Workplace-Share: 70
>>
>>      This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.
>>
>>      Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted
>>      in the new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if
>>      we should postpone the upgrade.
>>
>>      -ivan
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>>      On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>      <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org <mailto:zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>> wrote:
>>
>>          The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person
>>          templates with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure
>>          you have the redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in
>>          ReDIF-perl version 2.66, in place, or the new templates will be
>>          rejected.
>> 
>>
>>          --
>>          Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>>          Economic Research
>>          Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>          P.O. Box 442
>>          St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>          http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>>          _________________________________________________
>>          RePEc-run mailing list
>>          RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org <mailto:RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org>
>>          http://lists.openlib.org/__mailman/listinfo/repec-run
>>          <http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  RAS-run mailing list
>>  RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>  http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From Sune.Karlsson at oru.se  Tue Feb 28 17:00:57 2012
From: Sune.Karlsson at oru.se (Sune Karlsson)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 00:00:57 +0100
Subject: [RAS] [RePEc-run]  Fwd:  Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281645300.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202281645300.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <4F4D5CA9.1080605@oru.se>

'Christian Zimmermann' skrev 2012-02-28 23:47:
> The change to ReDIF was made back in November and announced.

Was it? The only thing I can find is this

>   Ivan Kurmanov writes
>
>> I went into aacis at holda.openlib.org, added the updateJEL.pl file to
>> darcs, pushed 3 more changes that Christian has requested, and ran
>> perl ./release.pl.
>>
>> This created file ReDIF-perl-2.66.tar.gz
>>

in an e-mail to RePEc-run from Thomas on Nov 13. Not very informative.

>
> The new workplace cluster type is easily identified with the
> workplace-institution field. The old one used workplace-organization.

Yes, but I don't want to code for two different versions unless I 
absolutely have to. So when will the change-over to the new format be 
complete?

Also, will the Workplace-Name be updated if the EDIRC data for 
Workplace-Institution is updated?

/Sune

>
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2012, Sune Karlsson wrote:
>
>> I am not entierly happy about the way this is done. It would have been
>> good with some advance notice before an incompatible change is made to
>> ReDIF.
>>
>> While the changes to RAS has been discussed (I believe only on
>> RAS-RUN) I can find no discussion of the changes to ReDIF.
>>
>> To make things worse we now have two different file formats in play at
>> the same time. When will the conversion to the new format be complete?
>>
>> I don't like the arrows in Workplace-Name.
>>
>> /Sune
>>
>> Ivan Kurmanov skrev 2012-02-28 17:13:
>>>
>>>
>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>> From: *Ivan Kurmanov* <duraley at gmail.com <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>>
>>> Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
>>> To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> <mailto:repec-run at lists.openlib.org>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, the higher-share affiliation would come first, actually. So, it
>>> may rather be like this after the upgrade:
>>>
>>> Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>>> ? Faculty of Economics
>>> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>> Workplace-Share: 70
>>> Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
>>> Studies (IISEPS)
>>> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>> Workplace-Share: 30
>>>
>>> -i
>>>
>>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i
>>> have warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is
>>> going to happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.
>>>
>>> The affiliation data in the template may look like this:
>>>
>>> Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>> Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>>
>>> But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:
>>>
>>> Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>>> ? Faculty of Economics
>>> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>> Workplace-Share: 30
>>> Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
>>> Studies (IISEPS)
>>> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>> Workplace-Share: 70
>>>
>>> This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.
>>>
>>> Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted
>>> in the new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if
>>> we should postpone the upgrade.
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org <mailto:zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person
>>> templates with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure
>>> you have the redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in
>>> ReDIF-perl version 2.66, in place, or the new templates will be
>>> rejected.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Zimmermann FIGUGEGL!
>>> Economic Research
>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> P.O. Box 442
>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>>
>>> _________________________________________________
>>> RePEc-run mailing list
>>> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org <mailto:RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org>
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/__mailman/listinfo/repec-run
>>> <http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RePEc-run mailing list
> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run

-- 
Sune Karlsson
Professor of Statistics
Handelsh?gskolan/?rebro University School of Business
Dekanus/Dean Fakulteten f?r ekonomi-, natur- och teknikvetenskap
?rebro University, SE-70182 ?rebro, Sweden
Phone +46 19 301257/301415
http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_karlsson
http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pka1.htm


From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Feb 29 04:36:08 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:36:08 +0200
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>

Sune and all,

I am sorry, this is partially my fault. I wrote an email about that back in
November 2011 to RePEc-run, but it had not reached anyone (since my email
address was not subscribed). And I didn't realize it had not reached anyone.

It is difficult to ensure now that all the person templates are displaying
affiliations consistently. It would mean regenerate the templates for
everyone, which is slow and expensive in CPU time.

We can remove the arrows in the Workplace-Name.

-ivan

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 12:41 AM, Sune Karlsson <Sune.Karlsson at oru.se>wrote:

> I am not entierly happy about the way this is done. It would have been
> good with some advance notice before an incompatible change is made to
> ReDIF.
>
> While the changes to RAS has been discussed (I believe only on RAS-RUN) I
> can find no discussion of the changes to ReDIF.
>
> To make things worse we now have two different file formats in play at the
> same time. When will the conversion to the new format be complete?
>
> I don't like the arrows in Workplace-Name.
>
> /Sune
>
> Ivan Kurmanov skrev 2012-02-28 17:13:
>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: *Ivan Kurmanov* <duraley at gmail.com <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>>
>> Date: Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:06 PM
>> Subject: Re: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
>> To: the gory details of RePEc <repec-run at lists.openlib.org
>> <mailto:repec-run at lists.**openlib.org <repec-run at lists.openlib.org>>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry, the higher-share affiliation would come first, actually. So, it
>> may rather be like this after the upgrade:
>>
>> Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>> ? Faculty of Economics
>> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>> Workplace-Share: 70
>> Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
>> Studies (IISEPS)
>> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>> Workplace-Share: 30
>>
>> -i
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com
>> <mailto:duraley at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    I have been reviewing past mail from myself, trying to find if i
>>    have warned you, guys, about a change in person templates that is
>>    going to happen. And I can't find it, so maybe it is just in my head.
>>
>>    The affiliation data in the template may look like this:
>>
>>    Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>    Workplace-Organization: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>
>>    But after the forthcomming upgrade, it would soon start looking as:
>>
>>    Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>>    ? Faculty of Economics
>>    Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
>>    Workplace-Share: 30
>>    Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
>>    Studies (IISEPS)
>>    Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>>    Workplace-Share: 70
>>
>>    This is a change that may require adaptation on your side.
>>
>>    Every ReDIF template generated after the upgrade will be formatted
>>    in the new way. Please let us know if this is a serious issue and if
>>    we should postpone the upgrade.
>>
>>    -ivan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>    <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org <mailto:zimmermann at stlouisfed.**org<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>        The RePEc Author Service will soon start disseminating person
>>        templates with new fields (Deceased, Workplace-Share). Make sure
>>        you have the redif.spec file dated 2011-11-10, distributed in
>>        ReDIF-perl version 2.66, in place, or the new templates will be
>>        rejected.
>>
>>
>>        --
>>        Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>>        Economic Research
>>        Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>        P.O. Box 442
>>        St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>        http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>>        ______________________________**___________________
>>        RePEc-run mailing list
>>        RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org <mailto:RePEc-run at lists.**openlib.org<RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org>
>> >
>>        http://lists.openlib.org/__**mailman/listinfo/repec-run<http://lists.openlib.org/__mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>>        <http://lists.openlib.org/**mailman/listinfo/repec-run<http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>>
>
> --
> Sune Karlsson
> Professor of Statistics
> Handelsh?gskolan/?rebro University School of Business
>
> Dekanus/Dean Fakulteten f?r ekonomi-, natur- och teknikvetenskap
> ?rebro University, SE-70182 ?rebro, Sweden
> Phone +46 19 301257/301415
> http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_**karlsson <http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_karlsson>
> http://econpapers.repec.org/**RAS/pka1.htm<http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pka1.htm>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120229/5e348021/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Wed Feb 29 07:43:09 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:43:09 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] confirmation error
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202290742040.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Someone is complaining that the confirmation URL generates an error, and 
it does indeed:

http://authors.repec.org/confirm%21f249462c


Application Error

We are sorry. A problem occurred inside our system. It is not your fault.
Here is what happened:

Can't locate object method "____object" via package 
"ACIS::Web::Session::SNewUser" at 
/home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/SaveProfile.pm line 43.


-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Wed Feb 29 12:07:36 2012
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 19:07:36 +0100
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: [RePEc-run] Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
 <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20120229180736.GA1900@openlib.org>


  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> I am sorry, this is partially my fault. I wrote an email about that back in
> November 2011 to RePEc-run, but it had not reached anyone (since my email
> address was not subscribed). And I didn't realize it had not reached anyone.

  My fault for discarding messages from non-members.

> It is difficult to ensure now that all the person templates are displaying
> affiliations consistently. It would mean regenerate the templates for
> everyone, which is slow and expensive in CPU time.

  But not as expensives as Sune's time.

> We can remove the arrows in the Workplace-Name.

  I suspect this would be a good idea.

  In any case, I don't have much of any opinion on the structure of
  the data, but I suggest the proponents of change make sure we have
  the redif documentation updated.

http://openlib.org/acmes/root/docu/redif_1.html
 
  Send me a changed version or let me know where one can be found.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Wed Feb 29 13:01:24 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 13:01:24 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202291301100.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Another strange message.

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 12:35:08 -0600
From: Cron Daemon <root at nebka.stlouisfed.org>
To: aras at nebka.stlouisfed.org
Subject: Cron <aras at nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
     /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log

session without lock? /home/aras/acis/userdata/m/d/mdavis at bus.wisc.edu.xml.lock at /home/aras/acis/lib/Web/App/Session.pm line 190.


From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Feb 29 14:32:12 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:32:12 +0300
Subject: [RAS] confirmation error
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202290742040.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202290742040.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQMY0pb9ixs6QTEBmVueZvzGn7=xmYoKYKRUocotH9MPA@mail.gmail.com>

Christian and all,

there is indeed a problem. It is the same problem as we had yesterday when
the clean-up script complained (and actually refused to work). It is rooted
in the backwards-incompatible changes in the structure of the session
files. This is my fault, and I must have thought about it and its scope
beforehand. Yesterday I have fixed part of the issue, but not all of it.

At this time here is what I have to say: I understand this issue and I'm
working on a fix. I estimate that I'll get the fix either later today (in
about an hour from now), or tomorrow.

I'll report as soon as I get it done or have other news.

-ivan



On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> Someone is complaining that the confirmation URL generates an error, and
> it does indeed:
>
> http://authors.repec.org/**confirm%21f249462c<http://authors.repec.org/confirm%21f249462c>
>
>
> Application Error
>
> We are sorry. A problem occurred inside our system. It is not your fault.
> Here is what happened:
>
> Can't locate object method "____object" via package
> "ACIS::Web::Session::SNewUser" at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**SaveProfile.pm
> line 43.
>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120229/c2c1a958/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Feb 29 14:48:53 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:48:53 +0300
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: confirmation error (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRkMVKOKhwEvSUSvqzWsjqyerODJ2dn+QQNpn4iYzHc6g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202291006450.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTHh+__h8aXFOr38+af7QfH+yD0p8ec7OYkSiRUCLxRvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRkMVKOKhwEvSUSvqzWsjqyerODJ2dn+QQNpn4iYzHc6g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTesYdXAQ_BHXSZMhD_+TY32JXJg9v6BMONGzKzYOE1oQ@mail.gmail.com>

FYI.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:44 PM
Subject: Re: confirmation error (fwd)
To: Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>


I think I have actually fixed it now. The confirm link works now:

Dear Nashwa Saleh,
> Your account is activated and your profile is now available at:
> http://authors.repec.org/pro/psa1024/
> Whenever you need to update your profile, you can login into our service.
> Or you may want to login now to try your account:
> .....


I am sorry for this issue.

-i


On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:

> I do get it, and I was getting the repec-run list all this time. its just
> that i was subscribed to it via one email address, but was trying to send
> my posts via another.
>
> -i
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
> zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
>> In case you are not getting ras-run either.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 07:43:09 -0600 (CST)
>> From: 'Christian Zimmermann' <zimmermann at repec-mail.**stlouisfed.org<zimmermann at repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
>> >
>> To: RAS-RUN <ras-run at lists.openlib.org>
>> Subject: confirmation error
>>
>> Someone is complaining that the confirmation URL generates an error, and
>> it does indeed:
>>
>> http://authors.repec.org/**confirm%21f249462c<http://authors.repec.org/confirm%21f249462c>
>>
>>
>> Application Error
>>
>> We are sorry. A problem occurred inside our system. It is not your fault.
>> Here is what happened:
>>
>> Can't locate object method "____object" via package
>> "ACIS::Web::Session::SNewUser" at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**SaveProfile.pm
>> line 43.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120229/e71e97ee/attachment.html>

From Sune.Karlsson at oru.se  Wed Feb 29 15:23:30 2012
From: Sune.Karlsson at oru.se (Sune Karlsson)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 22:23:30 +0100
Subject: [RAS] [RePEc-run]  Fwd:  Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <20120229180736.GA1900@openlib.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
 <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120229180736.GA1900@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <4F4E9752.4010506@oru.se>

Thomas Krichel skrev 2012-02-29 19:07:
>
>    Ivan Kurmanov writes
>
>> I am sorry, this is partially my fault. I wrote an email about that back in
>> November 2011 to RePEc-run, but it had not reached anyone (since my email
>> address was not subscribed). And I didn't realize it had not reached anyone.
>
>    My fault for discarding messages from non-members.

Shit happens, all that is water under the bridge...

>
>> It is difficult to ensure now that all the person templates are displaying
>> affiliations consistently. It would mean regenerate the templates for
>> everyone, which is slow and expensive in CPU time.
>
>    But not as expensives as Sune's time.

My time is scarce but not as expensive as I'd like. Never the less, it 
would be really good to have the templates regenerated. Fixing the bugs 
in the system must, of course, have priority. But after that, please!

/Sune

>
>> We can remove the arrows in the Workplace-Name.
>
>    I suspect this would be a good idea.
>
>    In any case, I don't have much of any opinion on the structure of
>    the data, but I suggest the proponents of change make sure we have
>    the redif documentation updated.
>
> http://openlib.org/acmes/root/docu/redif_1.html
>
>    Send me a changed version or let me know where one can be found.
>
>
>    Cheers,
>
>    Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                        http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                                 skype: thomaskrichel
>
> _______________________________________________
> RePEc-run mailing list
> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run

-- 
Sune Karlsson
Professor of Statistics
Handelsh?gskolan/?rebro University School of Business
Dekanus/Dean Fakulteten f?r ekonomi-, natur- och teknikvetenskap
?rebro University, SE-70182 ?rebro, Sweden
Phone +46 19 301257/301415
http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_karlsson
http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pka1.htm


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Wed Feb 29 15:30:53 2012
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 15:30:53 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] [RePEc-run]  Fwd:  Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <4F4E9752.4010506@oru.se>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
 <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120229180736.GA1900@openlib.org> <4F4E9752.4010506@oru.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202291529060.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Sune Karlsson wrote:

> Thomas Krichel skrev 2012-02-29 19:07:
>>
>>     Ivan Kurmanov writes
>> 
>> >  I am sorry, this is partially my fault. I wrote an email about that back 
>> >  in
>> >  November 2011 to RePEc-run, but it had not reached anyone (since my 
>> >  email
>> >  address was not subscribed). And I didn't realize it had not reached 
>> >  anyone.
>>
>>     My fault for discarding messages from non-members.
>
> Shit happens, all that is water under the bridge...
>
>> 
>> >  It is difficult to ensure now that all the person templates are 
>> >  displaying
>> >  affiliations consistently. It would mean regenerate the templates for
>> >  everyone, which is slow and expensive in CPU time.
>>
>>     But not as expensives as Sune's time.
>
> My time is scarce but not as expensive as I'd like. Never the less, it would 
> be really good to have the templates regenerated. Fixing the bugs in the 
> system must, of course, have priority. But after that, please!
>

There are competing interests. I have adapted my code and would have to 
readapt for a reversal (one cannot completely roll back, as the workplace 
shares and deceased fields are new anyway).

> /Sune
>
>> 
>> >  We can remove the arrows in the Workplace-Name.
>>
>>     I suspect this would be a good idea.
>>
>>     In any case, I don't have much of any opinion on the structure of
>>     the data, but I suggest the proponents of change make sure we have
>>     the redif documentation updated.
>>
>>  http://openlib.org/acmes/root/docu/redif_1.html
>>
>>     Send me a changed version or let me know where one can be found.
>> 
>>
>>     Cheers,
>>
>>     Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>>                                         http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>>                                                  skype: thomaskrichel
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  RePEc-run mailing list
>>  RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
>>  http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run
>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Feb 29 15:35:38 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:35:38 +0300
Subject: [RAS] [ACIS-tech]  [RePEc-run] Fwd: Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202291529060.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
 <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120229180736.GA1900@openlib.org> <4F4E9752.4010506@oru.se>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202291529060.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkT9Mhne==4FaAu=O8XqdJyEwAVvsiXSYDJCd0mTjd6i9A@mail.gmail.com>

Christian,

If I understand it right, Sune asks for consistency in the person
templates. In this case it means to convert all the person templates to
this form:

Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
 Faculty of Economics
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political Studies
(IISEPS)
Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby

(with optional Workplace-Share)

Sune, is this correct?

If yes, then this shouldn't require Christian to do any reversal work.

-i

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> My time is scarce but not as expensive as I'd like. Never the less, it
>> would be really good to have the templates regenerated. Fixing the bugs in
>> the system must, of course, have priority. But after that, please!
>>
>>
> There are competing interests. I have adapted my code and would have to
> readapt for a reversal (one cannot completely roll back, as the workplace
> shares and deceased fields are new anyway).
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120301/bae9ece1/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Feb 29 15:38:12 2012
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 00:38:12 +0300
Subject: [RAS] [ACIS-tech]  [RePEc-run] Fwd: Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkT9Mhne==4FaAu=O8XqdJyEwAVvsiXSYDJCd0mTjd6i9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
 <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120229180736.GA1900@openlib.org> <4F4E9752.4010506@oru.se>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202291529060.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT9Mhne==4FaAu=O8XqdJyEwAVvsiXSYDJCd0mTjd6i9A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQb4eK=0exCf_+NpFadhtW4gNF8zwZgbVsW_iOsM5-bJA@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Christian,
>
> If I understand it right, Sune asks for consistency in the person
> templates. In this case it means to convert all the person templates to
> this form:
>
> Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>  Faculty of Economics
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
> Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
> Studies (IISEPS)
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>
> (with optional Workplace-Share)
>
> Sune, is this correct?
>
> If yes, then this shouldn't require Christian to do any reversal work.
>

and I can start working on it tomorrow. Hopefully, i'll get the programming
work done within a day, and then it would take some time to have all the
files regenerated and transfered.

-i
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20120301/7f58a391/attachment.html>

From Sune.Karlsson at oru.se  Wed Feb 29 16:44:20 2012
From: Sune.Karlsson at oru.se (Sune Karlsson)
Date: Wed, 29 Feb 2012 23:44:20 +0100
Subject: [RAS] [RePEc-run] [ACIS-tech] Fwd: Have the latest redif.spec
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkT9Mhne==4FaAu=O8XqdJyEwAVvsiXSYDJCd0mTjd6i9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202211020500.8960@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTpxUcKiGfmq4OxntE+xHXoVUCODnxBSYH6Bc_0Pu6swA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkR-=+R4zFjAQBwoqHC8T4166PUZLWzVZkOT6XnE2-DLng@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSbAUHxtSexjV9QVVjg4QVXdh9xusLvHuVphtBfNL=VXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4D57FD.1080704@oru.se>
 <CAHGiUkQApYeZ49pvOPGcAGyDCBsfWFAbrBu=F6T4rpSN5vXhZQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20120229180736.GA1900@openlib.org> <4F4E9752.4010506@oru.se>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1202291529060.11235@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT9Mhne==4FaAu=O8XqdJyEwAVvsiXSYDJCd0mTjd6i9A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4F4EAA44.7090309@oru.se>

Ivan Kurmanov skrev 2012-02-29 22:35:
> Christian,
>
> If I understand it right, Sune asks for consistency in the person
> templates. In this case it means to convert all the person templates to
> this form:
>
> Workplace-Name: Belarusian State University
>   Faculty of Economics
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:febsuby
> Workplace-Name: Independent Institute of Socio-Economic & Political
> Studies (IISEPS)
> Workplace-Institution: RePEc:edi:iisepby
>
> (with optional Workplace-Share)
>
> Sune, is this correct?

Right on! Now that the deed is done we should go with the new syntax 
which I have nothing against as such.

Except that this introduces some ambiguity with respect to 
Workplace-Name. This is now defined in two places, the other being the 
EDIRC institution template that is also pointed to. Which is the 
authorotative source?

/Sune

>
> If yes, then this shouldn't require Christian to do any reversal work.
>
> -i
>
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org <mailto:zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>> wrote:
>
>         My time is scarce but not as expensive as I'd like. Never the
>         less, it would be really good to have the templates regenerated.
>         Fixing the bugs in the system must, of course, have priority.
>         But after that, please!
>
>
>     There are competing interests. I have adapted my code and would have
>     to readapt for a reversal (one cannot completely roll back, as the
>     workplace shares and deceased fields are new anyway).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RePEc-run mailing list
> RePEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/repec-run

-- 
Sune Karlsson
Professor of Statistics
Handelsh?gskolan/?rebro University School of Business
Dekanus/Dean Fakulteten f?r ekonomi-, natur- och teknikvetenskap
?rebro University, SE-70182 ?rebro, Sweden
Phone +46 19 301257/301415
http://www.oru.se/hh/sune_karlsson
http://econpapers.repec.org/RAS/pka1.htm


