[RAS] citations

[Ivan Kurmanov]

There are some small bits left, which will be picked up later, but the
overall update is done.

Citations total: 6,858,534

I have enabled the APU now.

-i

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> full citec update has been interrupted by the nightly restart of the
> daemon, but most of it was successfully processed. it is being
> continued now.
>
> the citations count is now at 6.73 million and growing.
>
> -i
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:21 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've started the full citec update:
>>
>> aras at nebka:~$ updareq citec / 1000
>> aras at nebka:~$
>>
>> citations records count is already growing.
>>
>> -i
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 9:12 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Finally, i've resolved it.
>>>
>>> It is not related (directly) to the UNIVERSAL::isa issue. Instead, it
>>> is an old (or otherwise buggy) AMF parser version that was the reason.
>>>
>>> I've installed version from AMF-perl-0.36.tar.gz and it has helped.
>>> After I remove some debugging code, a full citec update will be
>>> needed.
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Well, actually, the new nebka runs perl 5.10.1, but I assume that
>>>> already had some changes to the UNIVERSAL::isa func.
>>>>
>>>> -i
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> I've found new evidence. The citations data processing is broken at
>>>>> the AMF parser level and at the ACIS Input level.
>>>>>
>>>>> What i've found so far suggests, that it is caused by the sadly known
>>>>> UNIVERSAL::isa() function now being out of rule in perl 5.12.
>>>>>
>>>>> i'm working on a fix.
>>>>>
>>>>> -i
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 7:16 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>>>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>>>> My personal citation record is still at 8, while it was 180 initially.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, I've seen this in an earlier message of yours, and I see it now
>>>>>> in the data, and I'll start digging from this.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -i
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>