From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sat Oct  1 01:25:22 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2011 01:25:22 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [RAS] Sender ID
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110010124270.28337@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Still getting "sender ID not permitted" errors

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 30 Sep 2011 20:32:24 -0500
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at mx1.stlouisfed.org>
To: aras at nebka.stlouisfed.org
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

The following message to <klaus.becker at ttu.edu> was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.7.1 Sender ID (PRA) Not Permitted'
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "RePEc Author Service" <authors at repec.org>
Subject: [RePEc] confirm your registration
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:31:18 -0500
Size: 1656
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111001/72460074/attachment.mht>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sun Oct  2 03:48:50 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 03:48:50 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [RAS] Missing data in RAS
In-Reply-To: <4E8374B4.2050801@oru.se>
References: <4E8374B4.2050801@oru.se>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110020347570.9532@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Sorry for the late response, I have spotty Internet opportunities.

I relaunched an update for all of RePEc:taf.

On Wed, 28 Sep 2011, Sune Karlsson wrote:

> I've had some complaints from an author that his paper in taf:jitecd was 
> suddenly missing from his author page. Doing a handle search in the author 
> service I only find 150 items for taf:jitecd, there should be about 365. Is 
> the new server mirroring properly?
>
> /Sune
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Sun Oct  2 13:17:55 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sun, 2 Oct 2011 21:17:55 +0300
Subject: [RAS] cit_events
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1109260848470.3840@usuario-aab7161>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1109210932420.2676@usuario-aab7161>
	<20110921111714.GA30040@openlib.org>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109211403460.1552@usuario-aab7161>
	<CA+gnGmWcy8NR8vRupN3wM8tNv0bcLH3+tKA7zAR_YALQq+Rv4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109230928250.352@usuario-aab7161>
	<CAHGiUkTzthy2Qg5aHF9mtik5izumzqPjwS2s_t9kSGhmtM_5XA@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109260848470.3840@usuario-aab7161>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQEg7TEyaWnOzUmxbW+xdMyot3_imBvj5yp=7MCPux=xA@mail.gmail.com>

I've copied the missing export files from nebka to sopri and have
manually processed it there.

I've made a new script on nebka: ~/bin/ras2citec-export-job.sh . It
copies the export files to sopri and executes a script there,
~/Ivan/handle_ras_exports.pl . And it would log the result to a file
on nebka. I've disabled the old cronjob on sopri.

I'll check tomorrow if the arrangement works.

-i

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es> wrote:
>
> ? ? ? ?Hi Ivan,
>
> ? ? ? ?You should have already access to adnetec at sopri.openlib.org, if not,
> please send me your public key to add ssh access. The script is:
>
> /home/adnetec/etc/ras-exports-cronjob.sh
>
> ? ? ? ?this runs from a cron job every night. Regards,
>
>
> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> Jose,
>
> I could look into that, if i'm given access and if you point me to
> that particular script.
>
> (I'm in the area of a little unstable internet access right now.)
>
> -ivan
>
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es>
> wrote:
>>
>> ? ? ? ?Hi Dan, the files are now in sopri. The problem is that we need to
>> change the update script there because it was wrotten to fetch the files
>> from nebka. At the moment the script can't know what the new files are.
>> Ivan
>> could you have a look into this since the script was yours? Thanks,
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
>>
>>> Our policy is to not allow access to our servers from outside parties.
>>> ?Can
>>> we push the data to you instead of you pulling it from us?
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco
>>> <barrueco at uv.es>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> ? ? ? adnetec at sopri should have ssh access to the new nebka machine
>>>>>> ? ? ? a directory /home/adnetec/ras-exports should exists there where
>>>>>> cit_events files are stored.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> ?I had set up the access many days ago.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ? ? ? Then, the directory /home/adnetec/ras-exports is needed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco
>>>> ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>
>
> ---
> Jos? Manuel Barrueco ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>


From barrueco at uv.es  Mon Oct  3 01:47:28 2011
From: barrueco at uv.es (Jose Manuel Barrueco)
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 08:47:28 +0200 (Hora de verano romance)
Subject: [RAS] cit_events
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQEg7TEyaWnOzUmxbW+xdMyot3_imBvj5yp=7MCPux=xA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1109210932420.2676@usuario-aab7161>
	<20110921111714.GA30040@openlib.org>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109211403460.1552@usuario-aab7161>
	<CA+gnGmWcy8NR8vRupN3wM8tNv0bcLH3+tKA7zAR_YALQq+Rv4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109230928250.352@usuario-aab7161>
	<CAHGiUkTzthy2Qg5aHF9mtik5izumzqPjwS2s_t9kSGhmtM_5XA@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109260848470.3840@usuario-aab7161>
	<CAHGiUkQEg7TEyaWnOzUmxbW+xdMyot3_imBvj5yp=7MCPux=xA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1110030846530.3140@usuario-aab7161>


 	Great! Just on time to include the citations added in the last 
month to the next authors mailing. Thanks Ivan.


On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> I've copied the missing export files from nebka to sopri and have
> manually processed it there.
>
> I've made a new script on nebka: ~/bin/ras2citec-export-job.sh . It
> copies the export files to sopri and executes a script there,
> ~/Ivan/handle_ras_exports.pl . And it would log the result to a file
> on nebka. I've disabled the old cronjob on sopri.
>
> I'll check tomorrow if the arrangement works.
>
> -i
>
> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es> wrote:
>>
>> ? ? ? ?Hi Ivan,
>>
>> ? ? ? ?You should have already access to adnetec at sopri.openlib.org, if not,
>> please send me your public key to add ssh access. The script is:
>>
>> /home/adnetec/etc/ras-exports-cronjob.sh
>>
>> ? ? ? ?this runs from a cron job every night. Regards,
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> Jose,
>>
>> I could look into that, if i'm given access and if you point me to
>> that particular script.
>>
>> (I'm in the area of a little unstable internet access right now.)
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ? ? ? ?Hi Dan, the files are now in sopri. The problem is that we need to
>>> change the update script there because it was wrotten to fetch the files
>>> from nebka. At the moment the script can't know what the new files are.
>>> Ivan
>>> could you have a look into this since the script was yours? Thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
>>>
>>>> Our policy is to not allow access to our servers from outside parties.
>>>> ?Can
>>>> we push the data to you instead of you pulling it from us?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco
>>>> <barrueco at uv.es>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> ? ? ? adnetec at sopri should have ssh access to the new nebka machine
>>>>>>> ? ? ? a directory /home/adnetec/ras-exports should exists there where
>>>>>>> cit_events files are stored.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> ?I had set up the access many days ago.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ? ? ? Then, the directory /home/adnetec/ras-exports is needed.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco
>>>>> ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>
>


---
Jos? Manuel Barrueco				http://www.uv.es/=barrueco

From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Oct  3 03:00:04 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 3 Oct 2011 11:00:04 +0300
Subject: [RAS] cit_events
In-Reply-To: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1110030950350.3140@usuario-aab7161>
References: <Pine.WNT.4.64.1109210932420.2676@usuario-aab7161>
	<20110921111714.GA30040@openlib.org>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109211403460.1552@usuario-aab7161>
	<CA+gnGmWcy8NR8vRupN3wM8tNv0bcLH3+tKA7zAR_YALQq+Rv4g@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109230928250.352@usuario-aab7161>
	<CAHGiUkTzthy2Qg5aHF9mtik5izumzqPjwS2s_t9kSGhmtM_5XA@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1109260848470.3840@usuario-aab7161>
	<CAHGiUkQEg7TEyaWnOzUmxbW+xdMyot3_imBvj5yp=7MCPux=xA@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1110030846530.3140@usuario-aab7161>
	<CAHGiUkRx0EAX26kFMh5uv82fwo2p0Vi4+H2ArbQK_jrewtY=mQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<Pine.WNT.4.64.1110030950350.3140@usuario-aab7161>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSsrVNGN5mqN3vWdwHxYfhetcHQF_wVOodODniTDNqK4A@mail.gmail.com>

yes, it worked now. Thanks.
And I've found another bug in my new script. :)

-ivan

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es> wrote:
>
> ? ? ? ?try it again. I shut off mysql to do the monthly update. It took 10
> minutes but you try in this time... sorry,
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> this is what I get now when I try to process the most recent data file:
>>
>> startup [16599] /home/adnetec/Ivan/handle_ras_exports.pl
>> exports dir: /home/adnetec/ras-exports/
>> process /home/adnetec/ras-exports/cit_events.2011-10-02
>> DBI
>> connect('citec2;host=localhost;port=3307;mysql_read_default_file=/home/adnetec/.my.cnf','',...)
>> failed: Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket
>> '/home/adnetec/var/run/mysqld.sock' (2) at
>> /home/adnetec/CitEc/lib/citec.pm line 54
>> Can't call method "do" on an undefined value at
>> /home/adnetec/CitEc/lib/citec.pm line 57.
>> done
>>
>> (this happens on sopri)
>>
>> yesterday (approx. 12 hours ago) it worked.
>>
>> -i
>>
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 9:47 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> ? ? ? ?Great! Just on time to include the citations added in the last
>>> month
>>> to the next authors mailing. Thanks Ivan.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2 Oct 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've copied the missing export files from nebka to sopri and have
>>>> manually processed it there.
>>>>
>>>> I've made a new script on nebka: ~/bin/ras2citec-export-job.sh . It
>>>> copies the export files to sopri and executes a script there,
>>>> ~/Ivan/handle_ras_exports.pl . And it would log the result to a file
>>>> on nebka. I've disabled the old cronjob on sopri.
>>>>
>>>> I'll check tomorrow if the arrangement works.
>>>>
>>>> -i
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:52 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> ? ? ? ?Hi Ivan,
>>>>>
>>>>> ? ? ? ?You should have already access to adnetec at sopri.openlib.org, if
>>>>> not,
>>>>> please send me your public key to add ssh access. The script is:
>>>>>
>>>>> /home/adnetec/etc/ras-exports-cronjob.sh
>>>>>
>>>>> ? ? ? ?this runs from a cron job every night. Regards,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 23 Sep 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Jose,
>>>>>
>>>>> I could look into that, if i'm given access and if you point me to
>>>>> that particular script.
>>>>>
>>>>> (I'm in the area of a little unstable internet access right now.)
>>>>>
>>>>> -ivan
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco <barrueco at uv.es>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ? ? ? ?Hi Dan, the files are now in sopri. The problem is that we need
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> change the update script there because it was wrotten to fetch the
>>>>>> files
>>>>>> from nebka. At the moment the script can't know what the new files
>>>>>> are.
>>>>>> Ivan
>>>>>> could you have a look into this since the script was yours? Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our policy is to not allow access to our servers from outside
>>>>>>> parties.
>>>>>>> ?Can
>>>>>>> we push the data to you instead of you pulling it from us?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 7:04 AM, Jose Manuel Barrueco
>>>>>>> <barrueco at uv.es>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ? ? ? adnetec at sopri should have ssh access to the new nebka
>>>>>>>>>> machine
>>>>>>>>>> ? ? ? a directory /home/adnetec/ras-exports should exists there
>>>>>>>>>> where
>>>>>>>>>> cit_events files are stored.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ?I had set up the access many days ago.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ? ? ? Then, the directory /home/adnetec/ras-exports is needed.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco
>>>>>>>> ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco
>>>>>> ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco
>>>>> ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Jos? Manuel Barrueco
>>> ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ---
> Jos? Manuel Barrueco ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://www.uv.es/=barrueco
>


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Oct  4 02:34:59 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 02:34:59 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> ~/bin/ras2citec-export-job.sh
In-Reply-To: <201110030528.p935SA6v013678@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
References: <201110030528.p935SA6v013678@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110040234410.21627@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Something is not right.

On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Cron Daemon wrote:

> /home/aras/bin/ras2citec-export-job.sh: line 6: /home/aras/opt/log/citec-export.log: No such file or directory
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Oct  4 05:45:52 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 13:45:52 +0300
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> ~/bin/ras2citec-export-job.sh
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110040234410.21627@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <201110030528.p935SA6v013678@nebka.stlouisfed.org>
	<alpine.LRH.2.02.1110040234410.21627@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSNrW-Xt9mTjas2yQp3NabpzOTv3JTugbSb=Sw1QeyBig@mail.gmail.com>

I've seen this, Christian, and have taken action. Thank you.

-ivan

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> Something is not right.
>
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, Cron Daemon wrote:
>
>> /home/aras/bin/ras2citec-export-job.sh: line 6:
>> /home/aras/opt/log/citec-export.log: No such file or directory
>>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Tue Oct  4 12:54:44 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 12:54:44 -0500
Subject: [RAS] Mail Return-Path
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmVHPAnU2r0uzG8-JqMv0a3+C=k-DMWz7qmZiNbxkY8_GQ@mail.gmail.com>

We discussed earlier that emails were bouncing back to
aras at nebka.stlouisfed.org instead of authors at repec.org.  I've found that if
we add the header "Return-Path: authors at repec.org", the bounced emails would
go directly to the correct address.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111004/326c27a1/attachment.html>

From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Fri Oct  7 16:10:09 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:10:09 -0500
Subject: [RAS] SPF record
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmWEfA3Wp9pB9DibZJ7Etdiez9wm3mnLUxaXoxhbMJ6aZw@mail.gmail.com>

Can an SPF record be setup for repec.org to allow 65.89.18.25 as a
designated sender for authors at repec.org?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111007/66c090ac/attachment.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Oct  7 16:16:31 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 23:16:31 +0200
Subject: [RAS] SPF record
In-Reply-To: <CA+gnGmWEfA3Wp9pB9DibZJ7Etdiez9wm3mnLUxaXoxhbMJ6aZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+gnGmWEfA3Wp9pB9DibZJ7Etdiez9wm3mnLUxaXoxhbMJ6aZw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111007211631.GD23281@openlib.org>

  Dan Hayes writes
> Can an SPF record be setup for repec.org to allow 65.89.18.25 as a
> designated sender for authors at repec.org?

  done.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Fri Oct  7 16:21:56 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2011 16:21:56 -0500
Subject: [RAS] SPF record
In-Reply-To: <20111007211631.GD23281@openlib.org>
References: <CA+gnGmWEfA3Wp9pB9DibZJ7Etdiez9wm3mnLUxaXoxhbMJ6aZw@mail.gmail.com>
	<20111007211631.GD23281@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmVuDKwaLNgzkcKuXZBwDH81Pvo3BSVQqdEOFqyvi2Uuyg@mail.gmail.com>

Tested and it works great.  Thanks!

On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

>  Dan Hayes writes
> > Can an SPF record be setup for repec.org to allow 65.89.18.25 as a
> > designated sender for authors at repec.org?
>
>   done.
>
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111007/9a31fb34/attachment.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Sun Oct 16 23:36:36 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 06:36:36 +0200
Subject: [RAS] acis development
Message-ID: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>


  Hi,

  Is there any news regarding the state of development of ACIS
  as requested by Christian?

  I have not seen a patch to the ACIS software. Will Ivan's work be
  a fork of ACIS? 

  I thought we had agreed to work on a test installation of the
  current ACIS that I would prepare. I had not completed but I was not
  far off the target, when I got snowed under by teaching. I can't
  spend much of any time on this now but I can try to find some time
  for this this week, because I have a little breather.

  It now looks that coming mid-january, I will be able to spend 
  some serious time on ACIS. I will finish teaching an mid-March
  and then be free to work on ACIS and AuthorClaim until September
  next 2012. 


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Oct 17 17:48:09 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 01:48:09 +0300
Subject: [RAS] acis development
In-Reply-To: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>
References: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRidxezzwLKKUgDWyb9YQ_x5fodVYV1J0d=GmC82iS-iA@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas & all,

I have not started any significant development of new features yet.
There were some minor changes and bug fixes, and I've done them on the
live RAS system before or soon after the migration.

Last week I've started working on integrating these changes back into
the ACIS development. And most of that is done, just a few minor items
left. I will soon be ready to share those patches with you, if you
want. But they are based on a 2007 version of ACIS, and some of them
you already have in your version.

The obstacles to using the latest ACIS version that are unresolved,
that we need to clarify are:

 - does it support Storable strings in the objects table, and the
resources table (etc.) and in the RI db?

 - are the xslt templates compatible with the RAS phrases?

 - does it have any other changes that might turn out incompatible
with the current RAS setup?

You probably know the answer to the first of these questions, but the
rest require careful examination and/or tests.



Another thought I'm having is: do we really need the installation
script and procedure in ACIS?  My thinking now is that it is mostly
superflous. We could work on ACIS code in the same files and
directories as it is installed now, without the reshuffling that the
install.sh does. Most of the work that bin/setup does can also be
removed (with help of modules like FindBin, etc.).

It would make developing easier. Publishing changes would be done via
darcs repo directly, not via packaged versions.

But that's a separate question, although related.


-ivan


On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 7:36 AM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>
> ?Hi,
>
> ?Is there any news regarding the state of development of ACIS
> ?as requested by Christian?
>
> ?I have not seen a patch to the ACIS software. Will Ivan's work be
> ?a fork of ACIS?
>
> ?I thought we had agreed to work on a test installation of the
> ?current ACIS that I would prepare. I had not completed but I was not
> ?far off the target, when I got snowed under by teaching. I can't
> ?spend much of any time on this now but I can try to find some time
> ?for this this week, because I have a little breather.
>
> ?It now looks that coming mid-january, I will be able to spend
> ?some serious time on ACIS. I will finish teaching an mid-March
> ?and then be free to work on ACIS and AuthorClaim until September
> ?next 2012.
>
>
> ?Cheers,
>
> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Oct 18 09:07:20 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 09:07:20 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [RAS] acis development
In-Reply-To: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>
References: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110180906160.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I also hope it will go the other way. I am sure looking forward to have 
the ACIS paper claim page on RAS. I daily catch several people trying to 
refuse an item who end up accepting it.

On Mon, 17 Oct 2011, Thomas Krichel wrote:

>
>  Hi,
>
>  Is there any news regarding the state of development of ACIS
>  as requested by Christian?
>
>  I have not seen a patch to the ACIS software. Will Ivan's work be
>  a fork of ACIS?
>
>  I thought we had agreed to work on a test installation of the
>  current ACIS that I would prepare. I had not completed but I was not
>  far off the target, when I got snowed under by teaching. I can't
>  spend much of any time on this now but I can try to find some time
>  for this this week, because I have a little breather.
>
>  It now looks that coming mid-january, I will be able to spend
>  some serious time on ACIS. I will finish teaching an mid-March
>  and then be free to work on ACIS and AuthorClaim until September
>  next 2012.
>
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Tue Oct 18 11:33:00 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:33:00 +0200
Subject: [RAS] acis development
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRidxezzwLKKUgDWyb9YQ_x5fodVYV1J0d=GmC82iS-iA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkRidxezzwLKKUgDWyb9YQ_x5fodVYV1J0d=GmC82iS-iA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111018163259.GB20164@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> I have not started any significant development of new features yet.

  Good news for me.

> There were some minor changes and bug fixes, and I've done them on the
> live RAS system before or soon after the migration.
> 
> Last week I've started working on integrating these changes back into
> the ACIS development. And most of that is done, just a few minor items
> left. I will soon be ready to share those patches with you, if you
> want. But they are based on a 2007 version of ACIS, and some of them
> you already have in your version.

  I want them. But I am not sure if I will be able to meaningful
  intergate them into the current version. I am very cut for time
  right now, but I can try to free a day for this. This will have
  to be this or next week. 

> The obstacles to using the latest ACIS version that are unresolved,
> that we need to clarify are:
> 
>  - does it support Storable strings in the objects table, and the
> resources table (etc.) and in the RI db?

  Yes. The change is that it uses one single serialization module
  for all. That module tries Storable as well. 

>  - are the xslt templates compatible with the RAS phrases?

  The AC templates are namespace aware. That implies that the 
  phrases have to be put into the http://acis.openlib.org/ namespace.
  That's a one-minute job. 
 
>  - does it have any other changes that might turn out incompatible
> with the current RAS setup?

  When I did the conversion of the RAS presenter to the AC presenter,
  I did not convert the citaitions screens. 

> Another thought I'm having is: do we really need the installation
> script and procedure in ACIS?  My thinking now is that it is mostly
> superflous. 

  Yes.

> We could work on ACIS code in the same files and
> directories as it is installed now, without the reshuffling that the
> install.sh does. Most of the work that bin/setup does can also be
> removed (with help of modules like FindBin, etc.).

  I still run setup, for the RI writing the configuraiton, I think
  this can't be done without the current setup, a ri restart does
  not do that (maybe it ought?, oh, no that o/s depenedent). 

> It would make developing easier. Publishing changes would be done via
> darcs repo directly, not via packaged versions.

  But packaging colud still be done when we want to give people
  a copy of the software?

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From krichel at openlib.org  Tue Oct 18 11:36:25 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2011 18:36:25 +0200
Subject: [RAS] acis development
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110180906160.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110180906160.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111018163625.GC20164@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> I also hope it will go the other way. I am sure looking forward to
> have the ACIS paper claim page on RAS. I daily catch several people
> trying to refuse an item who end up accepting it.

  Well, we could have saved us a lot of work by installing 
  the lastest verison directly. We could also have saved us
  the embarrassment of the disappearing citations because they
  don't appear in the later ACIS version because of the  work
  I did updating AMF-Perl to modern Perl programming standards;
  without understanding how AMF-Perl does what it does, I hasten
  to add.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Oct 26 08:50:56 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:50:56 +0300
Subject: [RAS] acis development
In-Reply-To: <20111018163259.GB20164@openlib.org>
References: <20111017043636.GA28496@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkRidxezzwLKKUgDWyb9YQ_x5fodVYV1J0d=GmC82iS-iA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111018163259.GB20164@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRa6jDbuuSxyhRU=Ro_hfx+JcthXxMQ4N5MmLqGkZxVfg@mail.gmail.com>

Thomas,

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:33 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>> The obstacles to using the latest ACIS version that are unresolved,
>> that we need to clarify are:
>>
>> ?- does it support Storable strings in the objects table, and the
>> resources table (etc.) and in the RI db?
>
> ?Yes. The change is that it uses one single serialization module
> ?for all. That module tries Storable as well.

I've just noticed that the latest RePEc-Index does this:

$res=&Common::Data::inflate_json($val);

after reading the data from the db. The RAS database has all strings
in Storable format. Does inflate_json() expect Storable strings on
input?

>> ?- are the xslt templates compatible with the RAS phrases?
>
> ?The AC templates are namespace aware. That implies that the
> ?phrases have to be put into the http://acis.openlib.org/ namespace.
> ?That's a one-minute job.

sounds promising.

>> ?- does it have any other changes that might turn out incompatible
>> with the current RAS setup?
>
> ?When I did the conversion of the RAS presenter to the AC presenter,

what do you mean by that?

> ?I did not convert the citaitions screens.
>

-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Oct 27 12:04:00 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 12:04:00 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [RAS] almost
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1110271203180.20945@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

after last night's update of IDEAS, I notice that RAS has 29999 authors 
registered.

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


