From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Nov  4 06:37:34 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 13:37:34 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>

hi,

Thomas, Christian, Dan, could you please help me test the
http://ras.openlib.org/

It runs the latest ACIS with some corrections / fixes, and RAS data &
details. It does not have much data in terms of papers, but some, and
some citations. It does not run APU right now.

Known issues:
 * http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do not
work, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work

-i


From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Nov  4 16:51:22 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 22:51:22 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111104215122.GA11359@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes
> hi,
> 
> Thomas, Christian, Dan, could you please help me test the
> http://ras.openlib.org/
> 
> It runs the latest ACIS with some corrections / fixes, and RAS data &
> details. It does not have much data in terms of papers,

  did the problem with the update daemon crashing reappaer?

> 
> Known issues:
>  * http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do not
> work, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work

  Add this

  provfile-overview 404s. 

http://ras.openlib.org/profile-overview!e7de25b4

  but this again is probably a sysadmi rather than
  ACIS issue.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Nov  4 16:56:03 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 22:56:03 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>




  In /affiliations

  we have 

 Search institutions

 click here

  the anchor text is meaningless and document rather than
  subject talk.

  "more about author affilitiations" would be better

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sat Nov  5 14:57:22 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 14:57:22 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [RAS] time-out
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051456190.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I am getting a bit frequently the following error:

Gateway Time-out

The gateway did not receive a timely response from the upstream server or 
application.
Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS) Server at authors.repec.org Port 80


It has happened when I get into citations or the events log.

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Sat Nov  5 15:32:55 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 22:32:55 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>

Thanks to all who tested!
The updated list of known issues:
?* http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do
notwork, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work
?* profile-overview page returns 404 error
?* "click here" link on the affiliations screen
?* name variations on the research overview screen are shown with
toomuch spacing between them

Anything else?
-ivan
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> ?In /affiliations
>
> ?we have
>
> ?Search institutions
>
> ?click here
>
> ?the anchor text is meaningless and document rather than
> ?subject talk.
>
> ?"more about author affilitiations" would be better
>
> ?Cheers,
>
> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Sat Nov  5 16:25:18 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 16:25:18 -0500
Subject: [RAS] time-out
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051456190.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051456190.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmXQQmBr3=B=Gk8eZb7tpby+SAwCz0o_EzOVD0J2GTOVrA@mail.gmail.com>

I know there's a php timeout setting, is there one for perl as well?

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> I am getting a bit frequently the following error:
>
> Gateway Time-out
>
> The gateway did not receive a timely response from the upstream server or
> application.
> Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS) Server at authors.repec.org Port 80
>
>
> It has happened when I get into citations or the events log.
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111105/a3687224/attachment.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Sat Nov  5 16:28:08 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 22:28:08 +0100
Subject: [RAS] time-out
In-Reply-To: <CA+gnGmXQQmBr3=B=Gk8eZb7tpby+SAwCz0o_EzOVD0J2GTOVrA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051456190.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CA+gnGmXQQmBr3=B=Gk8eZb7tpby+SAwCz0o_EzOVD0J2GTOVrA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111105212808.GA17214@openlib.org>

  Dan Hayes writes
> I know there's a php timeout setting, is there one for perl as well?

  There is one in the apache configuration iirc.

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Sat Nov  5 17:39:28 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:39:28 -0500
Subject: [RAS] time-out
In-Reply-To: <20111105212808.GA17214@openlib.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051456190.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CA+gnGmXQQmBr3=B=Gk8eZb7tpby+SAwCz0o_EzOVD0J2GTOVrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111105212808.GA17214@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmWsRXxFmR=y5pc6OTHrhntUz00nuacsjApz3CoJGyhVJg@mail.gmail.com>

Its currently set at 60 seconds.  How long does the script need?  What
should it be set to?

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

>  Dan Hayes writes
> > I know there's a php timeout setting, is there one for perl as well?
>
>   There is one in the apache configuration iirc.
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111105/120b02b1/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sat Nov  5 17:43:42 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 17:43:42 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [RAS] time-out
In-Reply-To: <CA+gnGmWsRXxFmR=y5pc6OTHrhntUz00nuacsjApz3CoJGyhVJg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051456190.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CA+gnGmXQQmBr3=B=Gk8eZb7tpby+SAwCz0o_EzOVD0J2GTOVrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111105212808.GA17214@openlib.org>
 <CA+gnGmWsRXxFmR=y5pc6OTHrhntUz00nuacsjApz3CoJGyhVJg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051742490.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I would put it at 3 minutes. If I am a day or two late on log monitoring, 
the scripts needs that time.

On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:

> Its currently set at 60 seconds.  How long does the script need?  What
> should it be set to?
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>
>>  Dan Hayes writes
>>> I know there's a php timeout setting, is there one for perl as well?
>>
>>   There is one in the apache configuration iirc.
>>
>>  Cheers,
>>
>>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Sat Nov  5 18:53:48 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2011 18:53:48 -0500
Subject: [RAS] time-out
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051742490.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051456190.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CA+gnGmXQQmBr3=B=Gk8eZb7tpby+SAwCz0o_EzOVD0J2GTOVrA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111105212808.GA17214@openlib.org>
 <CA+gnGmWsRXxFmR=y5pc6OTHrhntUz00nuacsjApz3CoJGyhVJg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111051742490.19705@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmWn0V7ewv=w_3UFJbUaSAD=9EWpJdV2f0ui8D11O6p7ZA@mail.gmail.com>

Its now set to 180 seconds.  Let me know if I need to bump it again.

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> I would put it at 3 minutes. If I am a day or two late on log monitoring,
> the scripts needs that time.
>
>
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2011, Dan Hayes wrote:
>
>  Its currently set at 60 seconds.  How long does the script need?  What
>> should it be set to?
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>>   Dan Hayes writes
>>>
>>>> I know there's a php timeout setting, is there one for perl as well?
>>>>
>>>
>>>  There is one in the apache configuration iirc.
>>>
>>>  Cheers,
>>>
>>>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/**krichel<http://openlib.org/home/krichel>
>>>                                     http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>>>                                              skype: thomaskrichel
>>>
>>>
>>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111105/d8a10e20/attachment.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Sun Nov  6 14:14:00 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2011 21:14:00 +0100
Subject: [RAS] ras.openlib.org crash
In-Reply-To: <CAHJkeYD5da2okeLhR3coCuG-WY2U+jtv0WZpaXkDOZTA2pqHPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20111106123317.GB20712@openlib.org>
 <CAHJkeYD5da2okeLhR3coCuG-WY2U+jtv0WZpaXkDOZTA2pqHPw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111106201400.GI2441@openlib.org>

  James R. Griffin III writes

> I'm attempting to repair the MongoDB.  I really cannot afford to spend much
> more time on this for the next few weeks, and I certainly cannot oversee
> any major restoration for whatever work was done in the immediate future.
> 
> More importantly, what exactly happened?  Was ACIS running at the time of
> the crash? 

  Yes. The last log entries show a lot of logins to the ftp server
  by a client from google. I suspect that caused the crash. It should
  not have but there you go. 

> I know that the synchronous auversion and vertical integration
> scripts certainly were.  If so, I think that the migration of this testing
> version to another host should be very seriously considered.

  I doubt it was acis, although the time coincides with the
  start of a maintanence work of test RAS.

  The test installation is just that, a test. It will disappear
  when the current ACIS development work is done.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Nov 10 03:09:03 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 11:09:03 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111104215122.GA11359@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215122.GA11359@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRONiRn4bKJJc5YURrp5D_A=7n8qCvSkwwUyTfWo+kYXg@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:51 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
> ?Ivan Kurmanov writes
>> hi,
>> It runs the latest ACIS with some corrections / fixes, and RAS data &
>> details. It does not have much data in terms of papers,
>
> ?did the problem with the update daemon crashing reappaer?

I've fixed the problems with update daemon crashing.

>> Known issues:
>> ?* http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do not
>> work, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work
>
> ?Add this
>
> ?provfile-overview 404s.
>
> http://ras.openlib.org/profile-overview!e7de25b4
>
> ?but this again is probably a sysadmi rather than
> ?ACIS issue.

it is, actually. Apache configuration issue.

-ivan


From duraley at gmail.com  Sun Nov 13 07:39:03 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 15:39:03 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>

Christian and all,
I've done some more work on ACIS & RAS. I've integrated most template
(XSLT) changes that Christian did on RAS, both to screens and emails,
into the main (Thomas') ACIS version. None of the RAS-specific changes
went into the default template set (presentation/default/). I've
created a new phrase.xml file based on the one I took from nebka.

Thomas may find these patches in the aras at holda.openlib.org:dev/acis.r
repository, just as before.

Also, I've fixed the issues listed in the previous mail, see below.
To me this version looks as if it is ready to be installed on RAS.
Other problems may arise when we do this upgrade, but it is very hard
to diagnose them now. So, I suggest to do the last round of testing
and then install it.
-ivan

On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks to all who tested!
> The updated list of known issues:
> ?* http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do
> notwork, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work
> ?* profile-overview page returns 404 error
> ?* "click here" link on the affiliations screen
> ?* name variations on the research overview screen are shown with
> toomuch spacing between them
>
> Anything else?
> -ivan
> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> ?In /affiliations
>>
>> ?we have
>>
>> ?Search institutions
>>
>> ?click here
>>
>> ?the anchor text is meaningless and document rather than
>> ?subject talk.
>>
>> ?"more about author affilitiations" would be better
>>
>> ?Cheers,
>>
>> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Sun Nov 13 07:47:00 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 07:47:00 -0600
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>

I'll be out of the bank all of next week.  If you need me for anything, I
suggest you wait a week.

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:

> Christian and all,
> I've done some more work on ACIS & RAS. I've integrated most template
> (XSLT) changes that Christian did on RAS, both to screens and emails,
> into the main (Thomas') ACIS version. None of the RAS-specific changes
> went into the default template set (presentation/default/). I've
> created a new phrase.xml file based on the one I took from nebka.
>
> Thomas may find these patches in the aras at holda.openlib.org:dev/acis.r
> repository, just as before.
>
> Also, I've fixed the issues listed in the previous mail, see below.
> To me this version looks as if it is ready to be installed on RAS.
> Other problems may arise when we do this upgrade, but it is very hard
> to diagnose them now. So, I suggest to do the last round of testing
> and then install it.
> -ivan
>
> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks to all who tested!
> > The updated list of known issues:
> >  * http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do
> > notwork, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work
> >  * profile-overview page returns 404 error
> >  * "click here" link on the affiliations screen
> >  * name variations on the research overview screen are shown with
> > toomuch spacing between them
> >
> > Anything else?
> > -ivan
> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>  In /affiliations
> >>
> >>  we have
> >>
> >>  Search institutions
> >>
> >>  click here
> >>
> >>  the anchor text is meaningless and document rather than
> >>  subject talk.
> >>
> >>  "more about author affilitiations" would be better
> >>
> >>  Cheers,
> >>
> >>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
> >>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
> >>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> RAS-run mailing list
> >> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> >> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
> >>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111113/44970c2f/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Sun Nov 13 09:44:53 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:44:53 +0200
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>

Christian,

Part 2 of the planned ACIS-RAS changes includes:

> For multiple affiliations, let users specify percentages for
> each. Support it in ReDIF profile export.

I need a detailed description of this feature. How will it look and
behave? In particular, i have the following questions:

- would we allow entering any free number between 0 and 100? (as a
text input field.) Or do we allow choice of only certain values, like
10, 20, 30, 40, etc? (as a drop-down select control)
- do we ensure that the sum of the percentages equals exactly 100 or not?
- what happens when a user removes an affiliations (with some
percentage assigned to it)?
- how do we treat a case of three equally-important affiliations?
(33%? 33.33%? 30%?)
- do we sort the affiliations in the order of decreasing percentage
automatically?

I can prepare mockups after you answer these questions.

-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sun Nov 13 14:49:39 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:49:39 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Sun, 13 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian,
>
> Part 2 of the planned ACIS-RAS changes includes:
>
>> For multiple affiliations, let users specify percentages for
>> each. Support it in ReDIF profile export.
>
> I need a detailed description of this feature. How will it look and
> behave? In particular, i have the following questions:
>
> - would we allow entering any free number between 0 and 100? (as a
> text input field.) Or do we allow choice of only certain values, like
> 10, 20, 30, 40, etc? (as a drop-down select control)

I think free numbers are best

> - do we ensure that the sum of the percentages equals exactly 100 or not?

Yes. This could be enforced either by not allowing the person to go 
further with the total of 100, or by adjusting them proportioannly to a 
total to 100.

> - what happens when a user removes an affiliations (with some
> percentage assigned to it)?

See above.

> - how do we treat a case of three equally-important affiliations?
> (33%? 33.33%? 30%?)

34, 33, 33.

> - do we sort the affiliations in the order of decreasing percentage
> automatically?

That could be useful, as it is often requested from users.


Additional point:
say affiliation A is Dept X, School Y, University Z
B is School Y, University Z
C is Think Tank W

then it must always be that B>=A, and B+C=100. The reason is that A is 
part of B.

>
> I can prepare mockups after you answer these questions.
>
> -ivan
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Sun Nov 13 16:06:28 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 23:06:28 +0100
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111113220628.GA22852@openlib.org>


  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> Additional point:
> say affiliation A is Dept X, School Y, University Z
> B is School Y, University Z
> C is Think Tank W
> 
> then it must always be that B>=A, and B+C=100. The reason is that A
> is part of B.

  Do you want to enforce this at the point of data entry? 
  I don't think ACIS reads a relational structure of institutions
  at this time. So this would require changes at the back end.
  This would also have an effect on searches as well. 

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sun Nov 13 17:28:13 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:28:13 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] strange russian letter problem
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

There a re a bunch if recent Russian registrations like the one below that 
contain a capital A in the name, but it is not from the ASCII table. The 
consequence is that searches in RAS ar not successful.

1) how could this pass by the name requirements

2) anything else one can do about it?

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 17:21:10 -0600
From: RePEc Author Service <authors at repec.org>
To: ?natolij Ivanovich ?rkhipov <reparhipov at inecon.ru>
Subject: [RePEc] confirm your registration

Hello ?natolij Ivanovich ?rkhipov,

welcome to the RePEc Author Service. To finalize the registration
process, please click on the following address or paste it in your
browser:

http://authors.repec.org/confirm%21bf72a862

If you believe to have received this email by error, please ignore it.

Note that registration with RePEc <http://repec.org/> will not
grant you privileged access to password protected sites. The RePEc
Author Service is a tool that allows authors in Economics and related
fields to build a CV linking to their works in IDEAS, EconPapers and
Socionet, and vice-versa. You will receive a monthly mailing about
the popularity of your works on these services. We will also perform
some citation analysis for you.

We notice that you did not link to any works. There can be two reasons:

1) You registered only to get access to password protected online
    texts. Registering with the RePEc Author Service is useless for this,
    you need to register with the sites providing those texts, not RePEc.
    In such a case, there is no point in registering with RePEc.

2) You did not find any works of yours. This may be because the
    institutions where you publish do not yet participate in RePEc.
    Encourage them to do so. See <http://repec.org/>. Or is it that
    your name may appear with different spellings? In that case, you can
    confirm now, login and add alternative name spellings to your name
    variations before performing a new search.



Christian Zimmermann
for the RePEc Author Service team

---

All the details are on the RePEc Author Service site:

http://authors.repec.org/

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sun Nov 13 20:00:53 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:00:53 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <20111113220628.GA22852@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111113220628.GA22852@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131957580.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Sun, 13 Nov 2011, Thomas Krichel wrote:

>
>  'Christian Zimmermann' writes
>
>> Additional point:
>> say affiliation A is Dept X, School Y, University Z
>> B is School Y, University Z
>> C is Think Tank W
>>
>> then it must always be that B>=A, and B+C=100. The reason is that A
>> is part of B.
>
>  Do you want to enforce this at the point of data entry?
>  I don't think ACIS reads a relational structure of institutions
>  at this time. So this would require changes at the back end.
>  This would also have an effect on searches as well.

Not sure. This can be enforced only on this page, as the name string of B 
is a substring of A.

In any case, there are going to be imperfections. For example, when an 
Economics Department moves out of a Business School, the constraint above 
suddenly is not valid when I modify the institutional record, without the 
author visiting the profile. I guess this is sufficiently rare to be dealt 
with on a case-by-case basis.

>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Sun Nov 13 20:54:58 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 03:54:58 +0100
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131957580.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111113220628.GA22852@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131957580.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111114025458.GF23959@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> In any case, there are going to be imperfections.
 
  You will have to think about how to deal with these, at
  composition time or via an alert to an administrator. At
  composition time seems rather tricky to me.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sun Nov 13 20:59:34 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 20:59:34 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <20111114025458.GF23959@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111113220628.GA22852@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131957580.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111114025458.GF23959@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111132058120.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Thomas Krichel wrote:

>  'Christian Zimmermann' writes
>
>> In any case, there are going to be imperfections.
>
>  You will have to think about how to deal with these, at
>  composition time or via an alert to an administrator. At
>  composition time seems rather tricky to me.

I already do, for example when there are mergers, I need to make sure 
affiliations are transfered. As I said, this can and has been dealt with 
on a case-by-case basis. It would complicate RAS to much to deal with this 
internally.

>
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Nov 14 01:22:20 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 09:22:20 +0200
Subject: [RAS] strange russian letter problem
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSTGOQsqmfH8=2BFUe51sJabZLq4PrsavFroXgPPBYpvA@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> There a re a bunch if recent Russian registrations like the one below that
> contain a capital A in the name, but it is not from the ASCII table. The
> consequence is that searches in RAS ar not successful.
>
> 1) how could this pass by the name requirements

I've looked at this briefly. The english name in this record has only
ASCII characters, as required and enforced by the checking. The full
name has only cyrillic characters. The last name component has a
cyrillic letter at the start, and then the latin letters. This is
silly, but hardly dangerous. Are you saying there are many records
like this?

>
> 2) anything else one can do about it?

We could index the English name for this to show up in search results.
We could also ask them to fix it. We could notice this kind of thing
on input (on registration), and complain. But it would be an ad-hoc
check for this specific error: mix of cyrillic & english.


-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Nov 14 10:39:55 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 10:39:55 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] strange russian letter problem
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSTGOQsqmfH8=2BFUe51sJabZLq4PrsavFroXgPPBYpvA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkSTGOQsqmfH8=2BFUe51sJabZLq4PrsavFroXgPPBYpvA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141038340.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> There a re a bunch if recent Russian registrations like the one below that
>> contain a capital A in the name, but it is not from the ASCII table. The
>> consequence is that searches in RAS ar not successful.
>>
>> 1) how could this pass by the name requirements
>
> I've looked at this briefly. The english name in this record has only
> ASCII characters, as required and enforced by the checking. The full
> name has only cyrillic characters. The last name component has a
> cyrillic letter at the start, and then the latin letters. This is
> silly, but hardly dangerous. Are you saying there are many records
> like this?

All the ones here are susceptible: 
http://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html

>
>>
>> 2) anything else one can do about it?
>
> We could index the English name for this to show up in search results.
> We could also ask them to fix it. We could notice this kind of thing
> on input (on registration), and complain. But it would be an ad-hoc
> check for this specific error: mix of cyrillic & english.
>

I understand. One consequence is that they do not find their research, and 
for sure wonder why.

>
> -ivan
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Nov 14 14:37:46 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 22:37:46 +0200
Subject: [RAS] strange russian letter problem
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141038340.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkSTGOQsqmfH8=2BFUe51sJabZLq4PrsavFroXgPPBYpvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141038340.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRLgyH5BrJ9F4zdd4vWs5v1zBLDvNj5oODJt+-xSpCwcg@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Christian Zimmermann
>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> There a re a bunch if recent Russian registrations like the one below
>>> that
>>> contain a capital A in the name, but it is not from the ASCII table. The
>>> consequence is that searches in RAS ar not successful.
>>>
>>> 1) how could this pass by the name requirements
>>
>> I've looked at this briefly. The english name in this record has only
>> ASCII characters, as required and enforced by the checking. The full
>> name has only cyrillic characters. The last name component has a
>> cyrillic letter at the start, and then the latin letters. This is
>> silly, but hardly dangerous. Are you saying there are many records
>> like this?
>
> All the ones here are susceptible: http://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html

How do you know? I've checked these ones and I don't see a cyrillic
letter in their name:

Arslanov, Vasily
Artem'eva, Lidiya
Baranenkova, Taisiya
Baranov, Eduard

-i


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Nov 14 15:00:35 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 15:00:35 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] strange russian letter problem
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRLgyH5BrJ9F4zdd4vWs5v1zBLDvNj5oODJt+-xSpCwcg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkSTGOQsqmfH8=2BFUe51sJabZLq4PrsavFroXgPPBYpvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141038340.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRLgyH5BrJ9F4zdd4vWs5v1zBLDvNj5oODJt+-xSpCwcg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141455110.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 1:28 AM, Christian Zimmermann
>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> There a re a bunch if recent Russian registrations like the one below
>>>> that
>>>> contain a capital A in the name, but it is not from the ASCII table. The
>>>> consequence is that searches in RAS ar not successful.
>>>>
>>>> 1) how could this pass by the name requirements
>>>
>>> I've looked at this briefly. The english name in this record has only
>>> ASCII characters, as required and enforced by the checking. The full
>>> name has only cyrillic characters. The last name component has a
>>> cyrillic letter at the start, and then the latin letters. This is
>>> silly, but hardly dangerous. Are you saying there are many records
>>> like this?
>>
>> All the ones here are susceptible: http://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html
>
> How do you know? I've checked these ones and I don't see a cyrillic
> letter in their name:
>
> Arslanov, Vasily
> Artem'eva, Lidiya
> Baranenkova, Taisiya
> Baranov, Eduard

Very low tech answer: when I get the confirmation email and read it using 
putty using a windows machine, the name appears with an illegible blurb 
for all capital A's. And in those cases, the search does not find there 
works, even though they got the right name variations (except for that 
letter).

Try with ?natolij Ivanovich ?rkhipov. A manual search for A. Arkhipov (as 
cut-and-pasted form the name variations) yields no result. When I type A. 
Arkhipov myself, there are 7 results, including 3 with the exact name 
variation...

>
> -i
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Nov 15 00:57:01 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 08:57:01 +0200
Subject: [RAS] strange russian letter problem
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141455110.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkSTGOQsqmfH8=2BFUe51sJabZLq4PrsavFroXgPPBYpvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141038340.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRLgyH5BrJ9F4zdd4vWs5v1zBLDvNj5oODJt+-xSpCwcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141455110.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRTw+NtDE_QgfMYtzoBK=e9JU9YquGJsLM1HcdQDpbS8g@mail.gmail.com>

2011/11/14 Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>:
>>> All the ones here are susceptible:
>>> http://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html
>>
>> How do you know? I've checked these ones and I don't see a cyrillic
>> letter in their name:
>>
>> Arslanov, Vasily
>> Artem'eva, Lidiya
>> Baranenkova, Taisiya
>> Baranov, Eduard
>
> Very low tech answer: when I get the confirmation email and read it using
> putty using a windows machine, the name appears with an illegible blurb for
> all capital A's. And in those cases, the search does not find there works,
> even though they got the right name variations (except for that letter).
>
> Try with ?natolij Ivanovich ?rkhipov. A manual search for A. Arkhipov (as
> cut-and-pasted form the name variations) yields no result. When I type A.
> Arkhipov myself, there are 7 results, including 3 with the exact name
> variation...

The Arkhipov case is clear -- that's the one you've pointed to in the
original case (by forwarding the confirmation mail). You seem to have
claimed all of the registrations at
http://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html have the same problem. I ask:
how do you know that all of them have it? Because I checked some and
found no problem. Maybe there's just 5 or 7 of them and, then, is it
worth bothering?


Anyway, a check for combining cyrillic & latin letters can be done,
and I can do it after the already agreed upon items under a separate
statement of work.

-i


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Nov 15 06:38:45 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 14:38:45 +0200
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkS+jd73jC-F9xSYYOzTyZkxt=WETtQwWeb_vxdZzzK_bg@mail.gmail.com>

Christian,

Your general requirements are clear, and I'm writing a kind of spec
with mockups to finalize the discussion.

But:

> Additional point:
> say affiliation A is Dept X, School Y, University Z
> B is School Y, University Z
> C is Think Tank W
>
> then it must always be that B>=A, and B+C=100. The reason is that A is part
> of B.

This is a complication that goes beyond the scope of the original item
in our agreement, which was:

> For multiple affiliations, let users specify percentages for each. Support it in ReDIF profile export.

So I do not promise you this additional feature.

But we can push it to the end of the development queue. And when I'm
done with the other features (as agreed), I may additionally do
something like this (or maybe there will be other items of the similar
status) as a free contribution to the project.

Or alternatively, if you believe this is really important, we must
agree on excluding some other work from the scope of the project.


Let me know if this is not appropriate to discuss this on this list.

-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Nov 15 07:42:27 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 07:42:27 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] strange russian letter problem
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRTw+NtDE_QgfMYtzoBK=e9JU9YquGJsLM1HcdQDpbS8g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131726000.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkSTGOQsqmfH8=2BFUe51sJabZLq4PrsavFroXgPPBYpvA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141038340.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRLgyH5BrJ9F4zdd4vWs5v1zBLDvNj5oODJt+-xSpCwcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111141455110.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRTw+NtDE_QgfMYtzoBK=e9JU9YquGJsLM1HcdQDpbS8g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111150741140.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> 2011/11/14 Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>:
>>>> All the ones here are susceptible:
>>>> http://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html
>>>
>>> How do you know? I've checked these ones and I don't see a cyrillic
>>> letter in their name:
>>>
>>> Arslanov, Vasily
>>> Artem'eva, Lidiya
>>> Baranenkova, Taisiya
>>> Baranov, Eduard
>>
>> Very low tech answer: when I get the confirmation email and read it using
>> putty using a windows machine, the name appears with an illegible blurb for
>> all capital A's. And in those cases, the search does not find there works,
>> even though they got the right name variations (except for that letter).
>>
>> Try with ?natolij Ivanovich ?rkhipov. A manual search for A. Arkhipov (as
>> cut-and-pasted form the name variations) yields no result. When I type A.
>> Arkhipov myself, there are 7 results, including 3 with the exact name
>> variation...
>
> The Arkhipov case is clear -- that's the one you've pointed to in the
> original case (by forwarding the confirmation mail). You seem to have
> claimed all of the registrations at
> http://edirc.repec.org/data/derasru.html have the same problem. I ask:
> how do you know that all of them have it? Because I checked some and
> found no problem. Maybe there's just 5 or 7 of them and, then, is it
> worth bothering?

Well, I noticed it for all capital A for authors of that institute. 
Somebody must be registering them.

>
>
> Anyway, a check for combining cyrillic & latin letters can be done,
> and I can do it after the already agreed upon items under a separate
> statement of work.

I have no further budget for this.

>
> -i
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Nov 15 13:00:15 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 21:00:15 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>

Christian, please do a test on http://ras.openlib.org/ and approve it,
so that when Dan is back we could do the upgrade.

-ivan

On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll be out of the bank all of next week.? If you need me for anything, I
> suggest you wait a week.
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Christian and all,
>> I've done some more work on ACIS & RAS. I've integrated most template
>> (XSLT) changes that Christian did on RAS, both to screens and emails,
>> into the main (Thomas') ACIS version. None of the RAS-specific changes
>> went into the default template set (presentation/default/). I've
>> created a new phrase.xml file based on the one I took from nebka.
>>
>> Thomas may find these patches in the aras at holda.openlib.org:dev/acis.r
>> repository, just as before.
>>
>> Also, I've fixed the issues listed in the previous mail, see below.
>> To me this version looks as if it is ready to be installed on RAS.
>> Other problems may arise when we do this upgrade, but it is very hard
>> to diagnose them now. So, I suggest to do the last round of testing
>> and then install it.
>> -ivan
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Thanks to all who tested!
>> > The updated list of known issues:
>> > ?* http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do
>> > notwork, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work
>> > ?* profile-overview page returns 404 error
>> > ?* "click here" link on the affiliations screen
>> > ?* name variations on the research overview screen are shown with
>> > toomuch spacing between them
>> >
>> > Anything else?
>> > -ivan
>> > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ?In /affiliations
>> >>
>> >> ?we have
>> >>
>> >> ?Search institutions
>> >>
>> >> ?click here
>> >>
>> >> ?the anchor text is meaningless and document rather than
>> >> ?subject talk.
>> >>
>> >> ?"more about author affilitiations" would be better
>> >>
>> >> ?Cheers,
>> >>
>> >> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>> >> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> RAS-run mailing list
>> >> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> >> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>


From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Nov 16 06:14:48 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 14:14:48 +0200
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkR8x8-Ag4i2L7_JjY9PhkTH4sefx4BiXYESyv6ENXiYiQ@mail.gmail.com>

Here is my affiliations draft. I could make this into a google
document, but let's start with plain text:


Affiliations' percentages spec draft with questions


I'm using the "we" pronoun in the following mainly to mean the RAS/ACIS system.

We let users enter percentage for each affiliations that they list in
their profile. We show an input box for each affiliation, with some
label next to it. For example, in this mockup I use "Share:" as the
label: http://www.screencast.com/t/qza127hJ0e

Or we change the affiliations display to a table view and put those
input boxes into a column, with the submit button below the column.
http://www.screencast.com/t/cNotuQQJ8uc

(We probably need the percent sign (%) near the input boxes, or in the
column title?)

 ? What would the input box label or the column label be?
 ? What label should the button have?

The [Save share changes] button can be disabled (grayed out) until the
user modifies one of the given percentage values (JavaScript).

By default, when a user first sees this screen with this feature
enabled, we calculate the percentage automatically, splitting the 100%
equally, in the best possible way (e.g. 34, 33, 33 in case of three
institutions).

User may change the numbers and submit the change by clicking the
[Save share changes] button. Then we process the share values given
and adjust it proportionally to a total of 100%. And we display the
same screen with adjusted numbers and with the affiliations sorted in
the order of decreasing share. Additionally, we show a confirmation
message in the top part of the page, saying "The affiliation shares
have been saved." or similar.

 ? Do we need such message? What text would you like to have there?

If a person deletes an affiliation, we adjust the remaining numbers in
the same way.

While adjusting the numbers we always ensure that the total sum of
them is 100, in the best way possible, while keeping the individual
numbers in the integer range 1-99.

The numbers entered by the users as a share are also enforced to be
numbers in the integer range 1-99. If a user enters a non-numeric
value, or a non-integer value, ACIS would show an error message
"Invalid share number. Use an integer between 1 and 99." and it would
bring back the displayed share of that affiliation to it's previous
value.

If the user has only one affiliation, we do not show the Share column,
the input boxes, the [Save share changes] button. (And no
Workplace-Share attribute is written into the ReDIF template in that
case.)

If the user has opened the affiliations page, has modified the Share
value for one or more affiliations, but then clicked on the [Delete]
button of some other affiliation, his change to the share values is
not saved. We may show a confirmation dialog if he wants to submit the
form without saving the share value.

 ? What should be the confirmation dialog text then? "The share
changes will not be saved. [Cancel] [OK]"

 ? Or alternatively, we could save the shares even in this case. Save
the shares AND delete the affiliation at the same time. Is this
better?


 ? Anything else to clarify or to consider?


-Ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Wed Nov 16 10:53:49 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:53:49 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Sorry for the delay. Very busy as always.

Comments:

research page: there is a [END-IF]--> in the right side bar

I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items 
corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes' 
currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?

manual search, search by author:
Died at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Contributions.pm line 555.
I think happens whenever there is a result.

this offers a contact page, which is not valid: 
http://ras.openlib.org/contact_us

Not sure my modifications were saved (I removed a slash in my homepage 
URL)

The confirmation email for a new registration was not sent (but that may 
be a feature of the test site).





On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian, please do a test on http://ras.openlib.org/ and approve it,
> so that when Dan is back we could do the upgrade.
>
> -ivan
>
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'll be out of the bank all of next week.? If you need me for anything, I
>> suggest you wait a week.
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Christian and all,
>>> I've done some more work on ACIS & RAS. I've integrated most template
>>> (XSLT) changes that Christian did on RAS, both to screens and emails,
>>> into the main (Thomas') ACIS version. None of the RAS-specific changes
>>> went into the default template set (presentation/default/). I've
>>> created a new phrase.xml file based on the one I took from nebka.
>>>
>>> Thomas may find these patches in the aras at holda.openlib.org:dev/acis.r
>>> repository, just as before.
>>>
>>> Also, I've fixed the issues listed in the previous mail, see below.
>>> To me this version looks as if it is ready to be installed on RAS.
>>> Other problems may arise when we do this upgrade, but it is very hard
>>> to diagnose them now. So, I suggest to do the last round of testing
>>> and then install it.
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 10:32 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Thanks to all who tested!
>>>> The updated list of known issues:
>>>> ?* http://ras.openlib.org/privacy-policy and some other pages do
>>>> notwork, but http://ras.openlib.org/about and /faq work
>>>> ?* profile-overview page returns 404 error
>>>> ?* "click here" link on the affiliations screen
>>>> ?* name variations on the research overview screen are shown with
>>>> toomuch spacing between them
>>>>
>>>> Anything else?
>>>> -ivan
>>>> On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:56 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ?In /affiliations
>>>>>
>>>>> ?we have
>>>>>
>>>>> ?Search institutions
>>>>>
>>>>> ?click here
>>>>>
>>>>> ?the anchor text is meaningless and document rather than
>>>>> ?subject talk.
>>>>>
>>>>> ?"more about author affilitiations" would be better
>>>>>
>>>>> ?Cheers,
>>>>>
>>>>> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>>>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>>>>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Wed Nov 16 11:32:42 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 11:32:42 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkR8x8-Ag4i2L7_JjY9PhkTH4sefx4BiXYESyv6ENXiYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR8x8-Ag4i2L7_JjY9PhkTH4sefx4BiXYESyv6ENXiYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161124300.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Here is my affiliations draft. I could make this into a google
> document, but let's start with plain text:
>
>
> Affiliations' percentages spec draft with questions
>
>
> I'm using the "we" pronoun in the following mainly to mean the RAS/ACIS system.
>
> We let users enter percentage for each affiliations that they list in
> their profile. We show an input box for each affiliation, with some
> label next to it. For example, in this mockup I use "Share:" as the
> label: http://www.screencast.com/t/qza127hJ0e
>
> Or we change the affiliations display to a table view and put those
> input boxes into a column, with the submit button below the column.
> http://www.screencast.com/t/cNotuQQJ8uc

I like this second one more. It clusters less the left hand side.

>
> (We probably need the percent sign (%) near the input boxes, or in the
> column title?)
>
> ? What would the input box label or the column label be?
> ? What label should the button have?

They are OK as in the mockup. But I suggest adding at the bottom of the 
column a "total" box, that adds up the shares, with a % sign. Javascript 
can add the shares live, as I have seen elsewhere.

Of course, what happens if someone does not have Javascript turned on?

>
> The [Save share changes] button can be disabled (grayed out) until the
> user modifies one of the given percentage values (JavaScript).
>
> By default, when a user first sees this screen with this feature
> enabled, we calculate the percentage automatically, splitting the 100%
> equally, in the best possible way (e.g. 34, 33, 33 in case of three
> institutions).
>
> User may change the numbers and submit the change by clicking the
> [Save share changes] button. Then we process the share values given
> and adjust it proportionally to a total of 100%. And we display the
> same screen with adjusted numbers and with the affiliations sorted in
> the order of decreasing share. Additionally, we show a confirmation
> message in the top part of the page, saying "The affiliation shares
> have been saved." or similar.
>
> ? Do we need such message? What text would you like to have there?
>

Confirmation is always good.

> If a person deletes an affiliation, we adjust the remaining numbers in
> the same way.
>
> While adjusting the numbers we always ensure that the total sum of
> them is 100, in the best way possible, while keeping the individual
> numbers in the integer range 1-99.
>
> The numbers entered by the users as a share are also enforced to be
> numbers in the integer range 1-99. If a user enters a non-numeric
> value, or a non-integer value, ACIS would show an error message
> "Invalid share number. Use an integer between 1 and 99." and it would
> bring back the displayed share of that affiliation to it's previous
> value.
>
> If the user has only one affiliation, we do not show the Share column,
> the input boxes, the [Save share changes] button. (And no
> Workplace-Share attribute is written into the ReDIF template in that
> case.)
>
> If the user has opened the affiliations page, has modified the Share
> value for one or more affiliations, but then clicked on the [Delete]
> button of some other affiliation, his change to the share values is
> not saved. We may show a confirmation dialog if he wants to submit the
> form without saving the share value.
>
> ? What should be the confirmation dialog text then? "The share
> changes will not be saved. [Cancel] [OK]"
>

SOmething like "Please adjust shares after deletion"?

> ? Or alternatively, we could save the shares even in this case. Save
> the shares AND delete the affiliation at the same time. Is this
> better?
>
>
> ? Anything else to clarify or to consider?

We may need an external link on or next to "Share" with some explanations. 
I propose:

"For multiple affiliations, please attribute a share to each. These will 
be used to determine the main affiliation and allocate ranking scores 
across affiliations. With affiliations in different regions or countries, 
your ranking scores will also be weighted accordingly."

>
>
> -Ivan
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Nov 16 15:28:35 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 23:28:35 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay. Very busy as always.
>
> Comments:
>
> research page: there is a [END-IF]--> in the right side bar

fixed.

>
> I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items
> corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes'
> currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?

Thomas, any additional configuration needed for that?

>
> manual search, search by author:
> Died at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Contributions.pm line 555.
> I think happens whenever there is a result.

Sorry, this was me working on the thing, and actually leaving it in a
half-broken state and going away. While I was doing my business, I
realized you have a good chance of stumbling upon this. Anyway, fixed
now.

>
> this offers a contact page, which is not valid:
> http://ras.openlib.org/contact_us
>
> Not sure my modifications were saved (I removed a slash in my homepage URL)

Not all of your modifications where saved, because some of them are
hard or impossible to merge with new interface. Which homepage URL do
you mean? Any other important modifications that are missing?

>
> The confirmation email for a new registration was not sent (but that may be
> a feature of the test site).

I'll check that tomorrow.


-Ivan

>
>
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> Christian, please do a test on http://ras.openlib.org/ and approve it,
>> so that when Dan is back we could do the upgrade.
>>


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Wed Nov 16 15:36:22 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:36:22 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161535160.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Wed, 16 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> Sorry for the delay. Very busy as always.
>>
>> Comments:
>>
>> research page: there is a [END-IF]--> in the right side bar
>
> fixed.
>
>>
>> I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items
>> corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes'
>> currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?
>
> Thomas, any additional configuration needed for that?
>
>>
>> manual search, search by author:
>> Died at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Contributions.pm line 555.
>> I think happens whenever there is a result.
>
> Sorry, this was me working on the thing, and actually leaving it in a
> half-broken state and going away. While I was doing my business, I
> realized you have a good chance of stumbling upon this. Anyway, fixed
> now.

I see, planting errors to see whether I would find them.

>
>>
>> this offers a contact page, which is not valid:
>> http://ras.openlib.org/contact_us
>>
>> Not sure my modifications were saved (I removed a slash in my homepage URL)
>
> Not all of your modifications where saved, because some of them are
> hard or impossible to merge with new interface. Which homepage URL do
> you mean? Any other important modifications that are missing?
>

I made changes to my profile, specifically to the URL of my homepage.

>>
>> The confirmation email for a new registration was not sent (but that may be
>> a feature of the test site).
>
> I'll check that tomorrow.
>
>
> -Ivan
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 15 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> Christian, please do a test on http://ras.openlib.org/ and approve it,
>>> so that when Dan is back we could do the upgrade.
>>>
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Wed Nov 16 15:37:15 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 22:37:15 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes
> >
> > I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items
> > corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes'
> > currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?
> 
> Thomas, any additional configuration needed for that?

  yes. I tihnk the default is to use learning.

  I can try to look at this tomorrow.

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From krichel at openlib.org  Thu Nov 17 15:52:23 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 22:52:23 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <20111117215223.GL919@openlib.org>

  Thomas Krichel writes
>   Ivan Kurmanov writes
> > >
> > > I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items
> > > corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes'
> > > currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?
> > 
> > Thomas, any additional configuration needed for that?
> 
>   yes. I tihnk the default is to use learning.

  The way the software works now is taht it uses learning
  to order the 

above-me-propose-accept = 0.7
below-me-propose-refuse = 0.699999999

  You can set these in the configuration. 

  You can certainly bulid  the "no choice" option by setting

above-me-propose-accept = 1
below-me-propose-refuse = 0

  But I believe this is suboptimal. 

  A crude rule that comes from name variation matching
  is no longer supported, but it could be supported again
  with code changes. 

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Nov 17 15:56:42 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 15:56:42 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111117215223.GL919@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org> <20111117215223.GL919@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171556190.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Thomas Krichel wrote:

>  Thomas Krichel writes
>>   Ivan Kurmanov writes
>>>>
>>>> I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items
>>>> corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes'
>>>> currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?
>>>
>>> Thomas, any additional configuration needed for that?
>>
>>   yes. I tihnk the default is to use learning.
>
>  The way the software works now is taht it uses learning
>  to order the
>
> above-me-propose-accept = 0.7
> below-me-propose-refuse = 0.699999999
>
>  You can set these in the configuration.
>
>  You can certainly bulid  the "no choice" option by setting
>
> above-me-propose-accept = 1
> below-me-propose-refuse = 0
>
>  But I believe this is suboptimal.
>
>  A crude rule that comes from name variation matching
>  is no longer supported, but it could be supported again
>  with code changes.

Do I understand right that name variations are now useless?

>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Thu Nov 17 16:07:08 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:07:08 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171556190.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <20111117215223.GL919@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171556190.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111117220708.GB15227@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> Do I understand right that name variations are now useless?

  No. The name variations is what is found. In the 
  base installation thaht I have done, only those 
  records that match name variations exactly are presented.

  What my base installation never had, (I don't know why)
  is a grouping of results by name variation types. (full
  names vs shortened names). This would be useless now since
  the ordering is done by learning.

  Note that libsvm and its utility scripts have to be installed.

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From krichel at openlib.org  Thu Nov 17 16:13:19 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:13:19 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171608180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <20111117215223.GL919@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171556190.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111117220708.GB15227@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171608180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111117221319.GC15227@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> OK. But the learning on ACIS tries to separate Economics (say) from
> not Economics.

  Yes, but it can also separate various areas of economocs, or
  different names of co-authors. 

> Here everything is Economics. Does that mean the
> threshold should be set much stricter to put good matches in yes?

  I don't know. It depends on the risk you want to take of false
  positives and false negatives.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Nov 17 16:15:29 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 16:15:29 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111117221319.GC15227@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org> <20111117215223.GL919@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171556190.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111117220708.GB15227@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171608180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111117221319.GC15227@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171614260.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Thu, 17 Nov 2011, Thomas Krichel wrote:

>  'Christian Zimmermann' writes
>
>> OK. But the learning on ACIS tries to separate Economics (say) from
>> not Economics.
>
>  Yes, but it can also separate various areas of economocs, or
>  different names of co-authors.
>
>> Here everything is Economics. Does that mean the
>> threshold should be set much stricter to put good matches in yes?
>
>  I don't know. It depends on the risk you want to take of false
>  positives and false negatives.

I guess we'll see from experience. Let's have rather strict for starters. 
Right now it is much too lax, as *everything* passes as 'yes'.

>
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Thu Nov 17 16:30:53 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 23:30:53 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171614260.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <20111117215223.GL919@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171556190.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111117220708.GB15227@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171608180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <20111117221319.GC15227@openlib.org>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111171614260.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111117223053.GD15227@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> I guess we'll see from experience. Let's have rather strict for
> starters. 

  The parameter couple can enforce that.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Nov 18 03:23:38 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 11:23:38 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>

The learning is disabled now on the test install. Christian, do you
want/need the learning?

-ivan

On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
> ?Ivan Kurmanov writes
>> >
>> > I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items
>> > corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes'
>> > currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?
>>
>> Thomas, any additional configuration needed for that?
>
> ?yes. I tihnk the default is to use learning.
>
> ?I can try to look at this tomorrow.
>
> ?Cheers,
>
> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel
>


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Fri Nov 18 07:55:47 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:55:47 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Tested again. Interesting that I was still logged in, and despite logging 
out, I am still able to get into the account without password. Not good.

Strangely, I now have no suggestions.

Doing a new registration, all are 'no', even exact name variations. Is 
that because learning is turned of?

On Fri, 18 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> The learning is disabled now on the test install. Christian, do you
> want/need the learning?
>
> -ivan
>
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>> ?Ivan Kurmanov writes
>>>>
>>>> I did a search for my documents. default should be on 'yes' for items
>>>> corresponding to name variations, 'no' for the others. All are 'yes'
>>>> currently. Or maybe put no choice by default?
>>>
>>> Thomas, any additional configuration needed for that?
>>
>> ?yes. I tihnk the default is to use learning.
>>
>> ?I can try to look at this tomorrow.
>>
>> ?Cheers,
>>
>> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Fri Nov 18 07:56:05 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 07:56:05 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180755530.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Something is not right.

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 03:35:04 -0600
From: Cron Daemon <root at nebka.stlouisfed.org>
To: aras at nebka.stlouisfed.org
Subject: Cron <aras at nebka> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
     /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log

[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: d/a/dartiskancs at gmail.com.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: p/u/punarjitroychowdhury at gmail.com.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: s/t/stephan.leitner at aau.at.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: m/i/michal.pakos at cerge-ei.cz.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: d/o/dongyan at cass.org.cn.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: a/a/aaharin at gmail.com.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: p/r/pradhanjayaprakash at gmail.com.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: c/a/carmelo.petraglia at gmail.com.xml
[13764] Forking a request: ACIS: f/r/francesco.timpano at unicatt.it.xml
DBD::mysql::st execute failed: MySQL server has gone away at /home/aras/acis/lib/sql_helper.pm line 453.
 	...propagated at /home/aras/acis/lib/sql_helper.pm line 296.


From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Nov 18 08:49:24 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:49:24 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111118144924.GB22505@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> Doing a new registration, all are 'no', even exact name variations.
> Is that because learning is turned of?

  No, the default behaviour is that if there is no result to
  the learning, the suggestion is reject.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Nov 18 09:11:46 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 16:11:46 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <20111104215603.GB11359@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkSdg0vMv3Jzjku-_KPr889cBaLbyGzxCS5Nx_i_j4ALmg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111118151146.GB22689@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes

> Tested again. Interesting that I was still logged in, and despite
> logging out, I am still able to get into the account without
> password. Not good.

  I think this is the default behaviour from the same IP. 

  From a different IP?

  I don't think I changed in a module in a login part.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Nov 21 03:58:56 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 11:58:56 +0200
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161124300.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR8x8-Ag4i2L7_JjY9PhkTH4sefx4BiXYESyv6ENXiYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161124300.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQ35A0r2xXDosuukGd0fsyPGC593a-Bo9ZWkg0rxyuQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>

>> label next to it. For example, in this mockup I use "Share:" as the
>> label: http://www.screencast.com/t/qza127hJ0e
>>
>> Or we change the affiliations display to a table view and put those
>> input boxes into a column, with the submit button below the column.
>> http://www.screencast.com/t/cNotuQQJ8uc
>
> I like this second one more. It clusters less the left hand side.

ok.

>> (We probably need the percent sign (%) near the input boxes, or in the
>> column title?)
>>
>> ? What would the input box label or the column label be?
>> ? What label should the button have?
>
> They are OK as in the mockup. But I suggest adding at the bottom of the
> column a "total" box, that adds up the shares, with a % sign. Javascript can
> add the shares live, as I have seen elsewhere.

Yes, and I like the idea.

> Of course, what happens if someone does not have Javascript turned on?

It would simply not react to share changes, or will be empty at all.

>> User may change the numbers and submit the change by clicking the
>> [Save share changes] button. Then we process the share values given
>> and adjust it proportionally to a total of 100%. And we display the
>> same screen with adjusted numbers and with the affiliations sorted in
>> the order of decreasing share. Additionally, we show a confirmation
>> message in the top part of the page, saying "The affiliation shares
>> have been saved." or similar.
>>
>> ? Do we need such message? What text would you like to have there?
>
> Confirmation is always good.

okay

>> If the user has opened the affiliations page, has modified the Share
>> value for one or more affiliations, but then clicked on the [Delete]
>> button of some other affiliation, his change to the share values is
>> not saved. We may show a confirmation dialog if he wants to submit the
>> form without saving the share value.
>>
>> ? What should be the confirmation dialog text then? "The share
>> changes will not be saved. [Cancel] [OK]"
>
> SOmething like "Please adjust shares after deletion"?

hmm.

>> ? Or alternatively, we could save the shares even in this case. Save
>> the shares AND delete the affiliation at the same time. Is this
>> better?
>>
>>
>> ? Anything else to clarify or to consider?
>
> We may need an external link on or next to "Share" with some explanations. I
> propose:
>
> "For multiple affiliations, please attribute a share to each. These will be
> used to determine the main affiliation and allocate ranking scores across
> affiliations. With affiliations in different regions or countries, your
> ranking scores will also be weighted accordingly."

okay.

I think that's enough for a first implementation, and then we would
iron out the details, if any.


-ivan


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Nov 22 16:22:10 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:22:10 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkTo9tDv3=J1H7yP78TcHwQGmy0wS2KCpBfPNBTgsS-iYg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+gnGmWFUTvoWhrKwX78RJm2wbP-7EQi7FNqa3oeJCBkc38RvQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFeHjBAGoz6NEqZFYaOr04ifc1gtpapo769sre94=cbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> I still get no suggestion. But adding another name gives me more, all exact
>> name matches, all with a 'no'
>>
>> So it looks like the system does not offer suggestions with the last name
>> any more, only exact names, and offers a 'no' for all of them.

Christian, please, test & review -- fixed now.

-ivan


>
> I will fix that.
>
> -ivan
>


From krichel at openlib.org  Tue Nov 22 16:29:00 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 23:29:00 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes
> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> > <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> >> I still get no suggestion. But adding another name gives me more, all exact
> >> name matches, all with a 'no'
> >>
> >> So it looks like the system does not offer suggestions with the last name
> >> any more, only exact names, and offers a 'no' for all of them.
> 
> Christian, please, test & review -- fixed now.

  How is this being fixed?


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Nov 22 16:47:19 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 00:47:19 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
> ?Ivan Kurmanov writes
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>> > <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> >> I still get no suggestion. But adding another name gives me more, all exact
>> >> name matches, all with a 'no'
>> >>
>> >> So it looks like the system does not offer suggestions with the last name
>> >> any more, only exact names, and offers a 'no' for all of them.
>>
>> Christian, please, test & review -- fixed now.
>
> ?How is this being fixed?

Now -- by making Yes the default choice for exact matches. Not based
on the relevance column, which is always zero in an environment
without learning. This change is not compatible with your ACIS
version.

And there's a whole other bunch of incompatible changes, like
switching back to HTML output in XSLT versus XHTML. And the backwards
namespaces simplification: I have mostly eliminated the XHTML
namespace use. I'm sorry about that, but I couldn't get some
javascript processed otherwise. (Not sure if /adm/events javascript
works on your installations, for example, and if it does -- how.)


-ivan


From krichel at openlib.org  Wed Nov 23 16:45:14 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 23:45:14 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111123224514.GE28393@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> Now -- by making Yes the default choice for exact matches. Not based
> on the relevance column, which is always zero in an environment
> without learning. This change is not compatible with your ACIS
> version.

  I am not impressed. I trust that this will only affect the
  presentation? Or is this is the perl code? Could this not
  be fixed by introducing a configuration paremented?
 
> And there's a whole other bunch of incompatible changes, like
> switching back to HTML output in XSLT versus XHTML. And the backwards
> namespaces simplification: I have mostly eliminated the XHTML
> namespace use. I'm sorry about that, but I couldn't get some
> javascript processed otherwise. (Not sure if /adm/events javascript
> works on your installations, for example, and if it does -- how.)

  I have never used /adm/events. But I am surprised it should be
  difficult to get this to work with a proper DOM approach. 


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Nov 24 02:52:16 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:52:16 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111123224514.GE28393@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111123224514.GE28393@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkS9De+Z-VSsN=G3ZfjHt9ahOVCsPix5xAnGv--ARn167g@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
> ?Ivan Kurmanov writes
>
>> Now -- by making Yes the default choice for exact matches. Not based
>> on the relevance column, which is always zero in an environment
>> without learning. This change is not compatible with your ACIS
>> version.
>
> ?I am not impressed. I trust that this will only affect the
> ?presentation? Or is this is the perl code? Could this not
> ?be fixed by introducing a configuration paremented?

To be honest, I'm not impressed either. Yes, the change is in
presentation, two xslt files.

Yes, it could be done more elegantly via a configuration parameter.
But we a very short on time.

aras at holda:~/dev/acis.r$ darcs diff -p "research/suggestions: back to
showing the default choice based on status, not on relevance.
incompatible with the learning, etc." | less

would show you the diff of that change.

>> And there's a whole other bunch of incompatible changes, like
>> switching back to HTML output in XSLT versus XHTML. And the backwards
>> namespaces simplification: I have mostly eliminated the XHTML
>> namespace use. I'm sorry about that, but I couldn't get some
>> javascript processed otherwise. (Not sure if /adm/events javascript
>> works on your installations, for example, and if it does -- how.)
>
> ?I have never used /adm/events. But I am surprised it should be
> ?difficult to get this to work with a proper DOM approach.

You never used /adm/events, and that is fine. But Christian and I use
it. And your change from HTML to XHTML broke it.

I failed to find the way to make it work with xhtml output, without
ugly constructs, that would render the javascript pieces unreadable.
If you find it, i'm fine. (I just don't see any benefit in xhtml
versus html to spend any more time on this.)


-ivan


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Nov 24 08:20:37 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:20:37 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkS9De+Z-VSsN=G3ZfjHt9ahOVCsPix5xAnGv--ARn167g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111123224514.GE28393@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkS9De+Z-VSsN=G3ZfjHt9ahOVCsPix5xAnGv--ARn167g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQB5S3WVRk0Q=OY5hgfdw-3H1g1UffT0Bb7F77hr0VHwg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:52 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 12:45 AM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>> ?Ivan Kurmanov writes
>>
>>> Now -- by making Yes the default choice for exact matches. Not based
>>> on the relevance column, which is always zero in an environment
>>> without learning. This change is not compatible with your ACIS
>>> version.
>>
>> ?I am not impressed. I trust that this will only affect the
>> ?presentation? Or is this is the perl code? Could this not
>> ?be fixed by introducing a configuration paremented?
>
> To be honest, I'm not impressed either. Yes, the change is in
> presentation, two xslt files.

Actually, there are also javascript changes. The change is:

Wed Nov 23 23:42:09 CET 2011  duraley at gmail.com
  * fix the green / red, i.e. yes / no highlighting, when working with
suggestions

-i


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Nov 24 09:13:42 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:13:42 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111221627510.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161032070.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT8zVuMHSpP2k-Arg+kudaXTxJ_2WP44B_GEsw6=PXO+g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111221627510.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkT3sML1R=pLn45tqQAqmt8oonHSsNik1sb4Vy=nA-57dA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I still get no suggestion. But adding another name gives me more, all
>>>> exact
>>>> name matches, all with a 'no'
>>>>
>>>> So it looks like the system does not offer suggestions with the last
>>>> name
>>>> any more, only exact names, and offers a 'no' for all of them.
>>
>> Christian, please, test & review -- fixed now.
>
> It still offers only exact names, but with a 'yes'. So I cannot test whether
> it gives a default 'no' for inexact matches.
>
> Note 1: the 'yes' is not colored. Bug or feature?

this is now fixed. Please test again.


I suggest to upgrade to this and collect user feedback -- certainly
there are issue we have not noticed.


-i


From krichel at openlib.org  Thu Nov 24 09:17:45 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:17:45 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQB5S3WVRk0Q=OY5hgfdw-3H1g1UffT0Bb7F77hr0VHwg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111123224514.GE28393@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkS9De+Z-VSsN=G3ZfjHt9ahOVCsPix5xAnGv--ARn167g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkQB5S3WVRk0Q=OY5hgfdw-3H1g1UffT0Bb7F77hr0VHwg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111124151745.GB16711@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> Actually, there are also javascript changes. The change is:
> 
> Wed Nov 23 23:42:09 CET 2011  duraley at gmail.com
>   * fix the green / red, i.e. yes / no highlighting, when working with
> suggestions

  ok, these JS and XSLT changed  are changes to the default presentation?
  
  I suggest to open a RAS presentation in acis.r as 
  additional file sets, and then apply the changes to 
  that presentation. Could you do that?

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From krichel at openlib.org  Thu Nov 24 09:32:14 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 16:32:14 +0100
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkS9De+Z-VSsN=G3ZfjHt9ahOVCsPix5xAnGv--ARn167g@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111123224514.GE28393@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkS9De+Z-VSsN=G3ZfjHt9ahOVCsPix5xAnGv--ARn167g@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111124153214.GC16711@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> To be honest, I'm not impressed either. Yes, the change is in
> presentation, two xslt files.
> 
> Yes, it could be done more elegantly via a configuration parameter.

  If you can't get this done, I will do it in the Summer. 

> But we a very short on time.

  There are two issues I have with this. The lack of 
  a parameter is one. The other one is Christian's disinterest
  in learning. He heaps praise on the learning in NEP, but
  he does not want to have it in RAS. The RAS data has mistakes
  that the learning will have find and/or prevent. The learning
  is a a better predictor of relevance that the old full/partial
  name. But I can't demonstrate these claims.

> aras at holda:~/dev/acis.r$ darcs diff -p "research/suggestions: back to
> showing the default choice based on status, not on relevance.
> incompatible with the learning, etc." | less
> 
> would show you the diff of that change.

  thank you!!

> I failed to find the way to make it work with xhtml output, without
> ugly constructs, that would render the javascript pieces unreadable.

  and you would never ever write a piece of unreadable code, not even
  under threat of torture ;-)


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Nov 24 15:56:11 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:56:11 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111124153214.GC16711@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111122222900.GA30712@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkQXXvve2o3Co7GUi5oaa+MwFh5B5voXEX-vH5aR7cnqOA@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111123224514.GE28393@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkS9De+Z-VSsN=G3ZfjHt9ahOVCsPix5xAnGv--ARn167g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111124153214.GC16711@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRgerZFBinYGB_T4qJFUn6JdCjDucEBGF3nV=1Owo58pg@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
> ?There are two issues I have with this. The lack of
> ?a parameter is one. The other one is Christian's disinterest
> ?in learning. He heaps praise on the learning in NEP, but
> ?he does not want to have it in RAS. The RAS data has mistakes
> ?that the learning will have find and/or prevent. The learning
> ?is a a better predictor of relevance that the old full/partial
> ?name. But I can't demonstrate these claims.

My issue with learning in ACIS is lack of documentation describing it.
If I were to enable it in RAS, I'd be at a loss on what's needed to
make it run, and how it has to be configured. Maybe it is documented
somewhere, but I missed it?

Similarly, your use of sub-project code names, like pitman, cardiff,
etc. in ACIS code is a pain for me. Are they explained somewhere?
(They are still useful as they are, as they mark related pieces of
your code, but they are annoying like signs in a foreign language i
don't have a dictionary for.)

(And I know you have been frustrated by lack of documentation for my code.)

-i


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Fri Nov 25 21:02:40 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2011 21:02:40 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkT3sML1R=pLn45tqQAqmt8oonHSsNik1sb4Vy=nA-57dA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111221627510.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT3sML1R=pLn45tqQAqmt8oonHSsNik1sb4Vy=nA-57dA@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111252102000.1297@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:34 AM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, 23 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I still get no suggestion. But adding another name gives me more, all
>>>>> exact
>>>>> name matches, all with a 'no'
>>>>>
>>>>> So it looks like the system does not offer suggestions with the last
>>>>> name
>>>>> any more, only exact names, and offers a 'no' for all of them.
>>>
>>> Christian, please, test & review -- fixed now.
>>
>> It still offers only exact names, but with a 'yes'. So I cannot test whether
>> it gives a default 'no' for inexact matches.
>>
>> Note 1: the 'yes' is not colored. Bug or feature?
>
> this is now fixed. Please test again.
>

I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact 
name variations.

>
> I suggest to upgrade to this and collect user feedback -- certainly
> there are issue we have not noticed.
>
>
> -i
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Sat Nov 26 14:24:10 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 22:24:10 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111252102000.1297@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111116213715.GA15774@openlib.org>
 <CAHGiUkStb952F+nQAp7PSKxB4gfB1zMNpyegDJL33iB+Q6psnQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111221627510.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT3sML1R=pLn45tqQAqmt8oonHSsNik1sb4Vy=nA-57dA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111252102000.1297@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQF8fP9uLFTA5ypd9Frx_YPx3Tt_=w9di7C+nH+ETfW2Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
> I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact
> name variations.

Because all items that could be offered to you as the surname-only
matches were in your refused list. I've removed most items from your
refused list. Now, if you enter and check, you'll see a few of the
inexact matches, offered with No by default.

But I now see some mangled characters (Unicode), and that's something
I need to investigate.

-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Sat Nov 26 14:30:02 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 14:30:02 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQF8fP9uLFTA5ypd9Frx_YPx3Tt_=w9di7C+nH+ETfW2Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111221627510.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT3sML1R=pLn45tqQAqmt8oonHSsNik1sb4Vy=nA-57dA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111252102000.1297@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQF8fP9uLFTA5ypd9Frx_YPx3Tt_=w9di7C+nH+ETfW2Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111261426470.7670@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>
>> I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact
>> name variations.
>
> Because all items that could be offered to you as the surname-only
> matches were in your refused list. I've removed most items from your
> refused list. Now, if you enter and check, you'll see a few of the
> inexact matches, offered with No by default.

That is odd, because I did not have any refused items for "Ana Cavajal"... 
But I see it works fine now.

I see now a button "refuse all undecided options". Why that, there is no 
undecided item to have.

>
> But I now see some mangled characters (Unicode), and that's something
> I need to investigate.
>

That is most likely an issue with the relevant RePEc archive.

> -ivan
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Sat Nov 26 16:32:32 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 00:32:32 +0200
Subject: [RAS] test on ras.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111261426470.7670@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuqnHkTbWzoLVxn_bJ=695-ajYOO2pNuv13p-M8eK-fQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180750180.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQjYHrEsEgfppm7MuuoXayTLVkLA1nzWsk40D1PZkNKeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180814270.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkS1Uom2cyQkLmuadtt-QBpOiGd33vmMRkh3HBDAGL1xMg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180825360.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRuzejKmtj_zhix6CpP3aeRP6jumw2TBG3J+HCeVWeX_A@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111180854430.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ16n-Pf6WSKjHO4vgzgts6qGLFch4xG7jgsOammrq5Wg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkS8XR4CtSihnrLtZ5Xxd7P3J_Wvws6XCDycxXk3qAfztA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111221627510.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkT3sML1R=pLn45tqQAqmt8oonHSsNik1sb4Vy=nA-57dA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111252102000.1297@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQF8fP9uLFTA5ypd9Frx_YPx3Tt_=w9di7C+nH+ETfW2Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111261426470.7670@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <171979CD-BE15-4B4E-9F27-537E3191A841@gmail.com>

You did not have any refused items for that name, no. But additional name variations could not generate inexact matches right now. Only your last name could. The inexact search for name variations is only done in APU, which is disabled. If I enable APU now, it may start sending out various emails to actual unsuspecting users. 

I'll check that refuse button. I think we simply do not need it now.

-Ivan


On 26.11.2011, at 22:30, "'Christian Zimmermann'" <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
> 
>> On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Christian Zimmermann
>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I am still not able to generate a 'no', as the system only displays exact
>>> name variations.
>> 
>> Because all items that could be offered to you as the surname-only
>> matches were in your refused list. I've removed most items from your
>> refused list. Now, if you enter and check, you'll see a few of the
>> inexact matches, offered with No by default.
> 
> That is odd, because I did not have any refused items for "Ana Cavajal"... But I see it works fine now.
> 
> I see now a button "refuse all undecided options". Why that, there is no undecided item to have.
> 
>> 
>> But I now see some mangled characters (Unicode), and that's something
>> I need to investigate.
>> 
> 
> That is most likely an issue with the relevant RePEc archive.
> 
>> -ivan
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Nov 29 12:56:17 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:56:17 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111291256010.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Do we still have a SPF issue?

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: 29 Nov 2011 19:16:04 +0100
From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at univ-montp1.fr>
To: authors at repec.org
Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)

The following message to <francois.mirabel at sfr.fr> was undeliverable.
The reason for the problem:
5.1.0 - Unknown address error 554-'5.7.1 <authors at repec.org>: Sender address rejected: Please%see%http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?sender=authors%40repec.org&ip=193.51.157.11&receiver=msfrf2403 : Reason: mechanism'
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded message was scrubbed...
From: "RePEc Author Service" <authors at repec.org>
Subject: [RePEc] automatic research profile update
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:16:02 -0600
Size: 6591
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111129/582f744b/attachment.mht>

