From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Dec  1 06:37:04 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 14:37:04 +0200
Subject: [RAS] research profile, accept selections buttons
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkS-Rg4U32g3c0q-PPdLiLVdw5n1ZLN5JeOmP6XZVUiRDw@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

I've gone through the buttons on the main research profile screens.
Removed the refuse undecided button. Made the remaning buttons larger.
Please check. Below are the screenshots.

research/accepted, top of the page:
Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/19RkEMkhQ
IE9: http://screencast.com/t/pOquFT3xfBNr

research/accepted, bottom of the page:
Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/tVE9BpVHjUM0
IE9: http://screencast.com/t/loIM6rrio

research/refused table:
Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/e9ou0gpII
IE9: http://screencast.com/t/oD5hvEJ1l

auto-suggestions, chunk by chunk, top of page:
Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/4Cohqd7q47g

auto-suggestions, chunk by chunk, bottom:
http://screencast.com/t/hPt7iY3ZY

auto-suggestions, all at once, top of page:
http://screencast.com/t/ayM5GBRBrg

auto-suggestions, all at once, page bottom:
http://screencast.com/t/s5Xwf3Bx


Ie. the pages look similar in Chrome and IE9, barring the blue border
in IE9. (The border marks the default form action, i think.)

Any comments?

-i


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Thu Dec  1 07:56:51 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 07:56:51 -0600
Subject: [RAS] Delivery Status Notification (Failure) (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111291256010.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111291256010.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmUUPsr16yd5Jd29r4NJDTA4BULpNgYJSd0Z8MoQQ=r+vQ@mail.gmail.com>

>From what I can see, everything is setup correctly.  Is this the only
failed message you got? or are a lot of them bouncing back as failed?

2011/11/29 Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>

> Do we still have a SPF issue?
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: 29 Nov 2011 19:16:04 +0100
> From: Mail Delivery System <MAILER-DAEMON at univ-montp1.fr>
> To: authors at repec.org
> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>
> The following message to <francois.mirabel at sfr.fr> was undeliverable.
> The reason for the problem:
> 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 554-'5.7.1 <authors at repec.org>: Sender
> address rejected: Please%see%http://spf.pobox.**
> com/why.html?sender=authors%**40repec.org&ip=193.51.157.11&**
> receiver=msfrf2403<http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?sender=authors%40repec.org&ip=193.51.157.11&receiver=msfrf2403>: Reason: mechanism'
> Final-Recipient: rfc822;francois.mirabel at sfr.fr
> Action: failed
> Status: 5.0.0 (permanent failure)
> Remote-MTA: dns; [93.17.128.86]
> Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 554-'5.7.1 <
> authors at repec.org>: Sender address rejected: Please%see%
> http://spf.pobox.com/why.html?sender=authors%40repec.org&ip=193.51.157.11&receiver=msfrf2403: Reason: mechanism' (delivery attempts: 0)
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: "RePEc Author Service" <authors at repec.org>
> To: "fran?ois mirabel" <francois.mirabel at univ-montp1.fr>
> Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 12:16:02 -0600
> Subject: [RePEc] automatic research profile update
> Dear fran?ois mirabel,
>
> This is an automatic message from RePEc Author Service. You don't need to
> reply.
>
> We ran an automatic search on our documents database for your name
> variations and email address and found these works, which you might have
> authored:
>
>  * Universal service obligations: the role of subsidization schemes and the
>    consequences of accounting separation
>    paper by Fran?ois MIRABEL & Jean-Christophe POUDOU & Michel ROLAND
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/07.01.67.html
>
>  * Concentration des march?s et comportements collusifs : des conflits
> entre
>    HHI et seuils de collusion
>    paper by Edmond BARANES & Fran?ois MIRABEL & Jean-Christophe POUDOU
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/07.01.68.html
>
>  * Strategic Storage and Competition in European Gas Markets
>    paper by Edmond Baranes & Fran?ois Mirabel & Jean-Christophe Poudou
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/lasrwp/2008.24.html
>
>  * Collusion Sustainability with Multimarket Contacts: Revisiting HHI Tests
>    paper by Edmond Baranes & Francois Mirabel & Jean-Christophe Poudou
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/lam/wpaper/09-05.html
>
>  * R?partitions modales urbaines, externalit?s et instauration de p?ages.
> Le
>    cas des externalit?s de congestion et des "externalit?s modales
>    crois?es"
>    article by Fran?ois Mirabel
>
> http://ideas.repec.org/a/prs/reveco/reco_0035-2764_1999_num_50_5_410129.html
>
>  * R?partitions modales urbaines, externalit?s et instauration de p?ages.
> Le
>    cas des externalit?s de congestion et des "externalit?s modales
>    crois?es"
>    article by Fran?ois Mirabel
>    http://ideas.repec.org/a/cai/recosp/reco_p1999_50n5_1007.html
>
>  * R?partitions modales urbaines, externalit?s et instauration de p?ages :
>    le cas des externalit?s de congestion et des externalit?s modales
>    crois?es
>    paper by Mirabel Fran?ois
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/97.02.06.html
>
>  * Les p?ages urbains pour une meilleure organisation des d?placements
>    paper by MIRABEL Fran?ois
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/05.04.57.html
>
>  * Acc?s strat?gique des tiers au stockage et concurrence dans le secteur
>    gazier*
>    article by Baranes, Edmond & Mirabel, Francois & Poudou, Jean-Christophe
>    http://ideas.repec.org/a/ris/actuec/v83y2007i1p37-53.html
>
>  * Bottleneck congestion pricing and modal split: Redistribution of toll
>    revenue
>    article by Mirabel, Fran?ois & Reymond, Mathias
>    http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v45y2011i1p18-30.html
>
>  * Une analyse economique de la structure verticale sur la chaine gazi?re
>    europ?enne
>    paper by Baranes, E. & Mirabel, F. & Poudou, J.-C.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/03.11.39.html
>
>  * Stockage de gaz et Modulation : une analyse strat?gique
>    paper by Baranes, E. & Mirabel, F. & Poudou, J.-C.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/04.07.48.html
>
>  * Funding Universal Service Obligations with an Essential Facility:
> Charges
>    vs. Taxes and Subsidies
>    paper by Madet, C. & Mirabel, F. & Poudou, J.-C. & Roland, M.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/04.07.47.html
>
>  * Structure du marche gazier americain, reglementation et tarification de
>    l'acces des tiers au reseau.
>    paper by David, L. & Mirabel, F.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/00.06.17.html
>
>  * Funding for Universal Service Obligations in Electricity Sector : the
>    case of green power development
>    paper by Favard, P. & Mirabel, F. & Poudou, J.-C.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/02.07.33.html
>
>  * Mechanisms of Funding for Universal Service Obligations: the Electricity
>    Case
>    paper by Mirabel, F. & Poudou, J.-C.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/03.11.41.html
>
>  * Stockage et Concurrence dans le secteur gazier
>    paper by Baranes, E. & Mirabel, F. & Poudou, J.-C.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/p/mop/credwp/03.11.42.html
>
>  * Universal service obligations: The role of subsidization schemes
>    article by Mirabel, F. & Poudou, J.-C. & Roland, M.
>    http://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/iepoli/v21y2009i1p1-9.html
>
> If any of these documents is yours, you can add it to your profile on the
> research profile suggestions page:
> http://authors.repec.org/research/autosuggest
>
> BTW, you still have 18 other documents which were found earlier but still
> wait for your decision. See them on your Research profile's automatic
> search suggestions page.
>
> If necessary, review and change your preferences with regard to automatic
> research profile update at:
> http://authors.repec.org/research/autoupdate
>
>
> ---
>
> The message was automatically generated by RePEc Author Service.
>
> http://authors.repec.org/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111201/e9340f39/attachment.html>

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Dec  1 08:07:20 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 08:07:20 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] research profile, accept selections buttons
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkS-Rg4U32g3c0q-PPdLiLVdw5n1ZLN5JeOmP6XZVUiRDw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkS-Rg4U32g3c0q-PPdLiLVdw5n1ZLN5JeOmP6XZVUiRDw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112010805550.28333@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Looks good to me. I also went into my test account, and it seems to work 
fine. I was surprised to find my previous exact matches added to my 
identified, but I guess I must have added them.

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've gone through the buttons on the main research profile screens.
> Removed the refuse undecided button. Made the remaning buttons larger.
> Please check. Below are the screenshots.
>
> research/accepted, top of the page:
> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/19RkEMkhQ
> IE9: http://screencast.com/t/pOquFT3xfBNr
>
> research/accepted, bottom of the page:
> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/tVE9BpVHjUM0
> IE9: http://screencast.com/t/loIM6rrio
>
> research/refused table:
> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/e9ou0gpII
> IE9: http://screencast.com/t/oD5hvEJ1l
>
> auto-suggestions, chunk by chunk, top of page:
> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/4Cohqd7q47g
>
> auto-suggestions, chunk by chunk, bottom:
> http://screencast.com/t/hPt7iY3ZY
>
> auto-suggestions, all at once, top of page:
> http://screencast.com/t/ayM5GBRBrg
>
> auto-suggestions, all at once, page bottom:
> http://screencast.com/t/s5Xwf3Bx
>
>
> Ie. the pages look similar in Chrome and IE9, barring the blue border
> in IE9. (The border marks the default form action, i think.)
>
> Any comments?
>
> -i
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Thu Dec  1 08:19:50 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 15:19:50 +0100
Subject: [RAS] ACIS::APU and the mail_user parameter
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQ8dLNBBhFRgafgse7m2RAxB-_FdwmQxxvttS7Xm8e2NQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRbqmc_FpuPo19MbkAZq-uRzKpF1qs8yuEhbo6kyuFkcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRrVehGT5AvBGh7KA-0anfNXaSP4yDjeb-xq2eRMoQt+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkQ8dLNBBhFRgafgse7m2RAxB-_FdwmQxxvttS7Xm8e2NQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111201141950.GA17925@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> For example, I see that the research profile search would send an
> email to admin in case it found any new suggestions.
> 
> It would also send a mail to the user, if mail_user were non-empty,
> but it is always empty.

  It has to be set on invocation. I have been paranoid about sending
  mail to users while I test APU. Remember I needed to build in 
  learning into APU. Therefore I added this parameter to make sure
  that only if the parameter is set, mail will be sent.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Dec  1 09:59:08 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 17:59:08 +0200
Subject: [RAS] ACIS::APU and the mail_user parameter
In-Reply-To: <20111201141950.GA17925@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRbqmc_FpuPo19MbkAZq-uRzKpF1qs8yuEhbo6kyuFkcg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRrVehGT5AvBGh7KA-0anfNXaSP4yDjeb-xq2eRMoQt+A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkQ8dLNBBhFRgafgse7m2RAxB-_FdwmQxxvttS7Xm8e2NQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111201141950.GA17925@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <80164722-D4F0-4E5A-B54E-EAD180212EC8@gmail.com>

Please could you summarize the changes to APU, that you had to do?

-Ivan


On 01.12.2011, at 16:19, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

>  Ivan Kurmanov writes
> 
>> For example, I see that the research profile search would send an
>> email to admin in case it found any new suggestions.
>> 
>> It would also send a mail to the user, if mail_user were non-empty,
>> but it is always empty.
> 
>  It has to be set on invocation. I have been paranoid about sending
>  mail to users while I test APU. Remember I needed to build in 
>  learning into APU. Therefore I added this parameter to make sure
>  that only if the parameter is set, mail will be sent.
> 
> 
>  Cheers,
> 
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Dec  1 10:03:05 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 18:03:05 +0200
Subject: [RAS] research profile, accept selections buttons
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112010805550.28333@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkS-Rg4U32g3c0q-PPdLiLVdw5n1ZLN5JeOmP6XZVUiRDw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112010805550.28333@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <EB3AEAE8-00EF-4DA9-ACFA-030B5FB05EDE@gmail.com>

Sorry, I have been entering your account while working on the research screens and on the feature of letting admin go into another person's account. (which I code named 'admin in disguise'). 

I'll invite you for testing that in a short while.

-Ivan


On 01.12.2011, at 16:07, "'Christian Zimmermann'" <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> Looks good to me. I also went into my test account, and it seems to work fine. I was surprised to find my previous exact matches added to my identified, but I guess I must have added them.
> 
> On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I've gone through the buttons on the main research profile screens.
>> Removed the refuse undecided button. Made the remaning buttons larger.
>> Please check. Below are the screenshots.
>> 
>> research/accepted, top of the page:
>> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/19RkEMkhQ
>> IE9: http://screencast.com/t/pOquFT3xfBNr
>> 
>> research/accepted, bottom of the page:
>> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/tVE9BpVHjUM0
>> IE9: http://screencast.com/t/loIM6rrio
>> 
>> research/refused table:
>> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/e9ou0gpII
>> IE9: http://screencast.com/t/oD5hvEJ1l
>> 
>> auto-suggestions, chunk by chunk, top of page:
>> Chrome: http://screencast.com/t/4Cohqd7q47g
>> 
>> auto-suggestions, chunk by chunk, bottom:
>> http://screencast.com/t/hPt7iY3ZY
>> 
>> auto-suggestions, all at once, top of page:
>> http://screencast.com/t/ayM5GBRBrg
>> 
>> auto-suggestions, all at once, page bottom:
>> http://screencast.com/t/s5Xwf3Bx
>> 
>> 
>> Ie. the pages look similar in Chrome and IE9, barring the blue border
>> in IE9. (The border marks the default form action, i think.)
>> 
>> Any comments?
>> 
>> -i
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Dec  1 15:01:14 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 23:01:14 +0200
Subject: [RAS] admin in disguise feature
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTMJ3WYnaLS6uF_azFzLGGN+CO5QkaJp=VJFVh8-d1hbQ@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

As a part of part 1 of my work for ACIS this fall/winter, I've added a
feature to let administrators to find a user's profile by short-id or
email address (login), enter it and modify it.

I've implemented this as follows:

 - only certain users are given this ability. The userdata file of the
user has to be modified to allow the feature. (one has to add the
/owner/type/admin key and set it to a non-zero value).

 - admin users have a special admin tools menu at the bottom of their
welcome screen, right after login.
   http://screencast.com/t/Lv29WXvXlif

   This menu is based on the menu we used to show on the /adm/*
screens, but reworked for clarity and ease.

 - the "search for personal records" link leads to a very simple form,
which asks for a short-id or an email address:
   http://screencast.com/t/hmAu58zR8Umy

 - search results are shown in a simple table:
   http://screencast.com/t/kuRk4266

 - clicking on the green link in the email column would directly take
the admin into that person's account:
   http://screencast.com/t/MZWLikG7XO

 - But the page top, where it normally offers the "settings" link and
"log out", is different in this case:
   http://screencast.com/t/hEdix2095p

 - ie. it clearly says that it is the 'admin in disguise', no settings
link, but an additional person search link is offered.
   Person search would take to the same search form as you have
already seen by now.

 - Each 'admin-in-disguise'-visited profile creates a new session from
the events logging point of view. It has the type "admin-user".
   http://screencast.com/t/TyieWDuLv

Comments welcome.

-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Dec  1 21:12:23 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 1 Dec 2011 21:12:23 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] admin in disguise feature
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTMJ3WYnaLS6uF_azFzLGGN+CO5QkaJp=VJFVh8-d1hbQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkTMJ3WYnaLS6uF_azFzLGGN+CO5QkaJp=VJFVh8-d1hbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112012102450.3925@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Thu, 1 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> As a part of part 1 of my work for ACIS this fall/winter, I've added a
> feature to let administrators to find a user's profile by short-id or
> email address (login), enter it and modify it.
>
> I've implemented this as follows:
>
> - only certain users are given this ability. The userdata file of the
> user has to be modified to allow the feature. (one has to add the
> /owner/type/admin key and set it to a non-zero value).
>
> - admin users have a special admin tools menu at the bottom of their
> welcome screen, right after login.
>   http://screencast.com/t/Lv29WXvXlif
>
>   This menu is based on the menu we used to show on the /adm/*
> screens, but reworked for clarity and ease.

You may want to think about the menu for deceased authors here, possibly.

>
> - the "search for personal records" link leads to a very simple form,
> which asks for a short-id or an email address:
>   http://screencast.com/t/hmAu58zR8Umy
>
> - search results are shown in a simple table:
>   http://screencast.com/t/kuRk4266
>

What could "actions" contain?

> - clicking on the green link in the email column would directly take
> the admin into that person's account:
>   http://screencast.com/t/MZWLikG7XO
>
> - But the page top, where it normally offers the "settings" link and
> "log out", is different in this case:
>   http://screencast.com/t/hEdix2095p
>
> - ie. it clearly says that it is the 'admin in disguise', no settings
> link, but an additional person search link is offered.
>   Person search would take to the same search form as you have
> already seen by now.
>
> - Each 'admin-in-disguise'-visited profile creates a new session from
> the events logging point of view. It has the type "admin-user".
>   http://screencast.com/t/TyieWDuLv
>

Very nice. This will make life much easier.

Given your setup, would it be easy to have separate wordings for the 
"change-of-email" and "account-deletion" confirmation emails. Current 
wording implies that the user does this, but I do those as well and user 
are all confused when they get the email. The alternative would of the 
sort like "the administrator deleted your account..." or "the 
administrator changed your email address in the system...".

> Comments welcome.
>
> -ivan
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Dec  2 15:44:05 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:44:05 +0200
Subject: [RAS] admin in disguise feature
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112012102450.3925@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkTMJ3WYnaLS6uF_azFzLGGN+CO5QkaJp=VJFVh8-d1hbQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112012102450.3925@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTabgORSO-3XP_MAHo=v_=pFNZK4yhrLTA+tGARan2H9Q@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 5:12 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>
> You may want to think about the menu for deceased authors here, possibly.
>

I'll think about it, but a little later.

>
> What could "actions" contain?
>

'move to deceased'. And, potentially, 'remove'. 'Change email' is
another option.

> Very nice. This will make life much easier.

good.


> Given your setup, would it be easy to have separate wordings for the
> "change-of-email" and "account-deletion" confirmation emails. Current
> wording implies that the user does this, but I do those as well and user are
> all confused when they get the email. The alternative would of the sort like
> "the administrator deleted your account..." or "the administrator changed
> your email address in the system...".

Yes. Please compile a list of wishes like these for the after-contract stage.

-i


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Dec  2 15:47:03 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:47:03 +0200
Subject: [RAS] showing password in emails
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSFk+owCN12OKhAk8XGUnuPT76+WuVCj6KAnSM36L34RQ@mail.gmail.com>

Christian,

am I right that the automatic processing mails must not contain the
user's password? this phrase:

Your password in our service is: ......

should I remove it?

-i


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Fri Dec  2 15:53:28 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:53:28 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] showing password in emails
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSFk+owCN12OKhAk8XGUnuPT76+WuVCj6KAnSM36L34RQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSFk+owCN12OKhAk8XGUnuPT76+WuVCj6KAnSM36L34RQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112021553010.13971@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I think it should be removed. We got numerous complaints about this.

On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian,
>
> am I right that the automatic processing mails must not contain the
> user's password? this phrase:
>
> Your password in our service is: ......
>
> should I remove it?
>
> -i
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Fri Dec  2 17:46:42 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 00:46:42 +0100
Subject: [RAS] sending email on holda.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTfOHzAe_C8Swt5qw2drEGjTNyO2Zj9drbcxYvhpAxy5A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkTfOHzAe_C8Swt5qw2drEGjTNyO2Zj9drbcxYvhpAxy5A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111202234642.GB3412@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> Thomas, do you think you could configure the mail server on holda for
> testing the email sending from ACIS/RAS?

  I think I did this. I have not set up a spam filter yet, though.

  The account is now authors at ras.openlib.org. /etc/aliases redirects
  this to the aras account, where you can edit the .forward. 

> And if you can do that, please note there may be already be some mails
> in the queue, which are better removed.

  Done.

> (unless they are to
> duraley at gmail.com, in which case they are fine.)

  I did not see any.

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Sat Dec  3 15:43:34 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 23:43:34 +0200
Subject: [RAS] sending email on holda.openlib.org
In-Reply-To: <20111202234642.GB3412@openlib.org>
References: <CAHGiUkTfOHzAe_C8Swt5qw2drEGjTNyO2Zj9drbcxYvhpAxy5A@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111202234642.GB3412@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <A9E987B5-3723-4BCF-95AB-FF4ED7858B4F@gmail.com>

Thank you.

-Ivan


On 03.12.2011, at 1:46, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

>  Ivan Kurmanov writes
> 
>> Thomas, do you think you could configure the mail server on holda for
>> testing the email sending from ACIS/RAS?
> 
>  I think I did this. I have not set up a spam filter yet, though.
> 
>  The account is now authors at ras.openlib.org. /etc/aliases redirects
>  this to the aras account, where you can edit the .forward. 
> 
>> And if you can do that, please note there may be already be some mails
>> in the queue, which are better removed.
> 
>  Done.
> 
>> (unless they are to
>> duraley at gmail.com, in which case they are fine.)
> 
>  I did not see any.
> 
>  Cheers,
> 
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Sat Dec  3 15:44:32 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sat, 3 Dec 2011 23:44:32 +0200
Subject: [RAS] showing password in emails
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112021553010.13971@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSFk+owCN12OKhAk8XGUnuPT76+WuVCj6KAnSM36L34RQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112021553010.13971@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <4B699D4A-25CD-4EE2-ABD6-F6BF1F37B1D0@gmail.com>

Thanks, Kit & Christian. Will remove that.

-Ivan


On 02.12.2011, at 23:53, "'Christian Zimmermann'" <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> I think it should be removed. We got numerous complaints about this.
> 
> On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
> 
>> Christian,
>> 
>> am I right that the automatic processing mails must not contain the
>> user's password? this phrase:
>> 
>> Your password in our service is: ......
>> 
>> should I remove it?
>> 
>> -i
>> 
> 
> -- 
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Dec  6 06:24:43 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:24:43 +0200
Subject: [RAS] APU
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQ11=YHe-tKdy0o9umNTSYwKmQdnKT=WCbR-ZhOG2nwfw@mail.gmail.com>

Christian & all,

I've done testing of the automatic profile update, both research
profile and citations, with some fixes. Today I've removed some pieces
from the Christian's profile (by hand) and ran APU for him. This
resulted in two mails sent. Christian, please check it.

If things look good, i suggest to finally upgrade the production RAS system.

-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Dec  6 08:32:49 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 08:32:49 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] APU
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQ11=YHe-tKdy0o9umNTSYwKmQdnKT=WCbR-ZhOG2nwfw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkQ11=YHe-tKdy0o9umNTSYwKmQdnKT=WCbR-ZhOG2nwfw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112060831200.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

They look good. The citation email is new, and works well.

I am currently doing the monthly mailing (halfway through), so we want to 
wait for next week to do upgrades, Tuesday being the best (Monday is 
always busier).

On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian & all,
>
> I've done testing of the automatic profile update, both research
> profile and citations, with some fixes. Today I've removed some pieces
> from the Christian's profile (by hand) and ran APU for him. This
> resulted in two mails sent. Christian, please check it.
>
> If things look good, i suggest to finally upgrade the production RAS system.
>
> -ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Tue Dec  6 11:12:07 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 11:12:07 -0600
Subject: [RAS] log rotate in /home/aras/opt on nebka
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmUqFe_820cxtNAKq+7Wm5cbgMZfrBH0LrTk1k7dOtDqCQ@mail.gmail.com>

Would it be possible to archive log files by appending the archive date
before filing instead of using log rotate?  If the date is appended, the
file never changes again and I can rsync the directory easily.  If the
files are archived with log rotate, over 3000 files in
/home/aras/opt/oldlog get renamed and rsync has to copy every file each
time.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111206/c2d2cc4b/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Dec  7 08:32:43 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:32:43 +0200
Subject: [RAS] log rotate in /home/aras/opt on nebka
In-Reply-To: <CA+gnGmUqFe_820cxtNAKq+7Wm5cbgMZfrBH0LrTk1k7dOtDqCQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+gnGmUqFe_820cxtNAKq+7Wm5cbgMZfrBH0LrTk1k7dOtDqCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSkJTOvw9jbUnuWRb=V=yLzXzNwrjWqF3mww=az129Ndg@mail.gmail.com>

i've modified /home/aras/etc/logrotate.conf to do that, by adding
"dateext" command to each section.

Will have to check if it worked correctly tomorrow.

-ivan

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Dan Hayes <dhayes501 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would it be possible to archive log files by appending the archive date
> before filing instead of using log rotate?? If the date is appended, the
> file never changes again and I can rsync the directory easily.? If the files
> are archived with log rotate, over 3000 files in /home/aras/opt/oldlog get
> renamed and rsync has to copy every file each time.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run


From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Dec  7 14:24:44 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 22:24:44 +0200
Subject: [RAS] Fwd: suspicious claim detection
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSABJ=WjmR8YtiELQHeqTxw5Ne_iSrSuCts+TRA186FGQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSABJ=WjmR8YtiELQHeqTxw5Ne_iSrSuCts+TRA186FGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSOjc-rEZc0o9CTC+pYBy87FTnHWuGWdsUGJUezn6Qn=Q@mail.gmail.com>

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com>
Date: Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:24 PM
Subject: suspicious claim detection
To: Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>


Christian, et al,

When you claim a work, but none of your name variations is present in
the name of authors (editors) of this work, such claim will be marked
and highlighted in the administrative events interface as "[warn]
contrib - accept-suspicious" and in red color.

Please test this feature on ras.openlib.org.

-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Wed Dec  7 16:19:25 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 16:19:25 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] [RePEc] new institution (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112071618330.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

I received this new institution email from the test site. To be honest, I 
prefer the "plain text" version of the current install.

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:13:34 +0100
From: RAS Test <authors at ras.openlib.org>
To: Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>
Cc: ???? ???????????? ???????? <duraley at gmail.com>
Subject: [RePEc] new institution

<organization id="info:lib/we:.....">
??<name>????????? ?????????</name>
??<name xml:lang="en">Sharashkina Kontora??</name>
??<we:location>Minsk, Belarus</we:location>
??<homepage>http://kontora.by</homepage>
??<email>mail at kontora.by</email>
</organization>

Submitted by user: ???? ???????????? ???????? <duraley at gmail.com>
while editing record repec:per:1978-02-17:ivan_kurmanov
Added to the record? yes


Christian Zimmermann
for the RePEc Author Service team

---

All the details are on the Test do not use site:

http://ras.openlib.org/

From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Dec  7 16:26:22 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 00:26:22 +0200
Subject: [RAS] [RePEc] new institution (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112071618330.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112071618330.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRugxW+7XDw2-x=UaCT1EbtxCNfrBQat9PfsnZzrVi1tw@mail.gmail.com>

oh, yes. This is to be fixed.

-i

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> I received this new institution email from the test site. To be honest, I
> prefer the "plain text" version of the current install.
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:13:34 +0100
> From: RAS Test <authors at ras.openlib.org>
> To: Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>
> Cc: ???? ???????????? ???????? <duraley at gmail.com>
> Subject: [RePEc] new institution
>
> <organization id="info:lib/we:.....">
> ??<name>????????? ?????????</name>
> ??<name xml:lang="en">Sharashkina Kontora??</name>
> ??<we:location>Minsk, Belarus</we:location>
> ??<homepage>http://kontora.by</homepage>
> ??<email>mail at kontora.by</email>
> </organization>
>
> Submitted by user: ???? ???????????? ???????? <duraley at gmail.com>
> while editing record repec:per:1978-02-17:ivan_kurmanov
> Added to the record? yes
>
>
> Christian Zimmermann
> for the RePEc Author Service team
>
> ---
>
> All the details are on the Test do not use site:
>
> http://ras.openlib.org/
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Dec  8 12:00:00 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 20:00:00 +0200
Subject: [RAS] [RePEc] new institution (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRugxW+7XDw2-x=UaCT1EbtxCNfrBQat9PfsnZzrVi1tw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112071618330.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkRugxW+7XDw2-x=UaCT1EbtxCNfrBQat9PfsnZzrVi1tw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSZ88QeQMAhTvkTai=x0p3mt1G7R__Pwh4gs-XOnOns=g@mail.gmail.com>

fixed now.

On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:26 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> oh, yes. This is to be fixed.
>
> -i
>
> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> I received this new institution email from the test site. To be honest, I
>> prefer the "plain text" version of the current install.
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2011 16:13:34 +0100
>> From: RAS Test <authors at ras.openlib.org>
>> To: Christian Zimmermann <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>
>> Cc: ???? ???????????? ???????? <duraley at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [RePEc] new institution
>>
>> <organization id="info:lib/we:.....">
>> ??<name>????????? ?????????</name>
>> ??<name xml:lang="en">Sharashkina Kontora??</name>
>> ??<we:location>Minsk, Belarus</we:location>
>> ??<homepage>http://kontora.by</homepage>
>> ??<email>mail at kontora.by</email>
>> </organization>
>>
>> Submitted by user: ???? ???????????? ???????? <duraley at gmail.com>
>> while editing record repec:per:1978-02-17:ivan_kurmanov
>> Added to the record? yes
>>
>>
>> Christian Zimmermann
>> for the RePEc Author Service team
>>
>> ---
>>
>> All the details are on the Test do not use site:
>>
>> http://ras.openlib.org/
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Dec 12 13:44:47 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:44:47 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>

Hi,

In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.

It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.

Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.

If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
midnight time on nebka server.

Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.

-ivan


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Dec 12 14:13:49 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:13:49 +0200
Subject: [RAS] APU
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112060831200.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkQ11=YHe-tKdy0o9umNTSYwKmQdnKT=WCbR-ZhOG2nwfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112060831200.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSTh+pnEyZ_6eDKUG+bj7qu_HeZZ+OH8bEnedywibGJWQ@mail.gmail.com>

Christian, when I initially got this response, I didn't pay much
attention to your phrase "The citation email is new". Because I was
pretty sure RAS was sending those mails out. But today I've found it
did not. This option is disabled. I'll leave it disabled until further
notice.

(those emails where designed and programmed in the old days.)

-ivan

On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> They look good. The citation email is new, and works well.
>
> I am currently doing the monthly mailing (halfway through), so we want to
> wait for next week to do upgrades, Tuesday being the best (Monday is always
> busier).
>
>
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> Christian & all,
>>
>> I've done testing of the automatic profile update, both research
>> profile and citations, with some fixes. Today I've removed some pieces
>> from the Christian's profile (by hand) and ran APU for him. This
>> resulted in two mails sent. Christian, please check it.
>>
>> If things look good, i suggest to finally upgrade the production RAS
>> system.
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Dec 12 14:24:01 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:24:01 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Hi,
>
> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>
> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>
> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.

I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except 
that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.

>
> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
> midnight time on nebka server.
>
> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>
> -ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Dec 12 14:24:51 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 14:24:51 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] APU
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSTh+pnEyZ_6eDKUG+bj7qu_HeZZ+OH8bEnedywibGJWQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkQ11=YHe-tKdy0o9umNTSYwKmQdnKT=WCbR-ZhOG2nwfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112060831200.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkSTh+pnEyZ_6eDKUG+bj7qu_HeZZ+OH8bEnedywibGJWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121424290.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian, when I initially got this response, I didn't pay much
> attention to your phrase "The citation email is new". Because I was
> pretty sure RAS was sending those mails out. But today I've found it
> did not. This option is disabled. I'll leave it disabled until further
> notice.

OK. Then I'll keep the new citations in the monthly emails.

>
> (those emails where designed and programmed in the old days.)
>
> -ivan
>
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> They look good. The citation email is new, and works well.
>>
>> I am currently doing the monthly mailing (halfway through), so we want to
>> wait for next week to do upgrades, Tuesday being the best (Monday is always
>> busier).
>>
>>
>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> Christian & all,
>>>
>>> I've done testing of the automatic profile update, both research
>>> profile and citations, with some fixes. Today I've removed some pieces
>>> from the Christian's profile (by hand) and ran APU for him. This
>>> resulted in two mails sent. Christian, please check it.
>>>
>>> If things look good, i suggest to finally upgrade the production RAS
>>> system.
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From krichel at openlib.org  Mon Dec 12 14:53:56 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 21:53:56 +0100
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111212205356.GA32507@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes

> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
> 
> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.

  I am flying of to Moscow tomorrow. It's a really bad day for
  me to take time off. I will be running around like a headless
  chicken doing last minute errands.

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Dec 12 14:55:23 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 22:55:23 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>

Good! The Keynes profile is available at
http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ and that is an apache
configuration issue, which live RAS must have already configured and
nothing that is related to that has been changed in ACIS code, i hope.

-ivan

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
>> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>>
>> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
>> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>>
>> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
>> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.
>
>
> I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except
> that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.
>
>>
>> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
>> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
>> midnight time on nebka server.
>>
>> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
>> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Dec 12 15:03:02 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:03:02 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

But
http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/
is not the same as
http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/

The first was the one listed after confirmation.


On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Good! The Keynes profile is available at
> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ and that is an apache
> configuration issue, which live RAS must have already configured and
> nothing that is related to that has been changed in ACIS code, i hope.
>
> -ivan
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
>>> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>>>
>>> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
>>> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>>>
>>> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
>>> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.
>>
>>
>> I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except
>> that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.
>>
>>>
>>> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
>>> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
>>> midnight time on nebka server.
>>>
>>> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
>>> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Dec 12 15:03:32 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:03:32 +0200
Subject: [RAS] APU
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121424290.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkQ11=YHe-tKdy0o9umNTSYwKmQdnKT=WCbR-ZhOG2nwfw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112060831200.15846@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkSTh+pnEyZ_6eDKUG+bj7qu_HeZZ+OH8bEnedywibGJWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121424290.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkQKTSuDPKp1wtYqx-QgWff3bvBgCxbrGcPpMAk8YhTN2A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> Christian, when I initially got this response, I didn't pay much
>> attention to your phrase "The citation email is new". Because I was
>> pretty sure RAS was sending those mails out. But today I've found it
>> did not. This option is disabled. I'll leave it disabled until further
>> notice.
>
> OK. Then I'll keep the new citations in the monthly emails.

Fine. We could enable them later at any time.

(Guys, thanks for testing ras.openlib.org!)

-i


>
>>
>> (those emails where designed and programmed in the old days.)
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> They look good. The citation email is new, and works well.
>>>
>>> I am currently doing the monthly mailing (halfway through), so we want to
>>> wait for next week to do upgrades, Tuesday being the best (Monday is
>>> always
>>> busier).
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Christian & all,
>>>>
>>>> I've done testing of the automatic profile update, both research
>>>> profile and citations, with some fixes. Today I've removed some pieces
>>>> from the Christian's profile (by hand) and ran APU for him. This
>>>> resulted in two mails sent. Christian, please check it.
>>>>
>>>> If things look good, i suggest to finally upgrade the production RAS
>>>> system.
>>>>
>>>> -ivan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>> Economic Research
>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> P.O. Box 442
>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Dec 12 15:05:29 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:05:29 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> But
> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/
> is not the same as
> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/
>
> The first was the one listed after confirmation.

I understand. Still this is purely apache configuration issue. What's
important is: Does http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ reflect the
current state of the profile you've created?


-i


>
>
>
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> Good! The Keynes profile is available at
>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ and that is an apache
>> configuration issue, which live RAS must have already configured and
>> nothing that is related to that has been changed in ACIS code, i hope.
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
>>>> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
>>>> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>>>>
>>>> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
>>>> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except
>>> that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
>>>> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
>>>> midnight time on nebka server.
>>>>
>>>> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
>>>> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>>>>
>>>> -ivan
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>> Economic Research
>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> P.O. Box 442
>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>
>>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Dec 12 15:06:57 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:06:57 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121506330.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> But
>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/
>> is not the same as
>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/
>>
>> The first was the one listed after confirmation.
>
> I understand. Still this is purely apache configuration issue. What's
> important is: Does http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ reflect the
> current state of the profile you've created?
>

Yes! I am very proud to have written all these works!

>
> -i
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> Good! The Keynes profile is available at
>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ and that is an apache
>>> configuration issue, which live RAS must have already configured and
>>> nothing that is related to that has been changed in ACIS code, i hope.
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
>>>>> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
>>>>> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
>>>>> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except
>>>> that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
>>>>> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
>>>>> midnight time on nebka server.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
>>>>> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>>>>>
>>>>> -ivan
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>>> Economic Research
>>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>>> P.O. Box 442
>>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From duraley at gmail.com  Mon Dec 12 15:07:44 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:07:44 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkSTnW+5q7Z9HtVG9MH0DKwmkDJ0S3iYakBjEdmTM1S5Mg@mail.gmail.com>

Christian, may I use your live actual profile for testing things
tomorrow after upgrade?

I'll bring it back to its' current state after tests.

-ivan

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> But
>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/
>> is not the same as
>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/
>>
>> The first was the one listed after confirmation.
>
> I understand. Still this is purely apache configuration issue. What's
> important is: Does http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ reflect the
> current state of the profile you've created?
>
>
> -i
>
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>
>>> Good! The Keynes profile is available at
>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ and that is an apache
>>> configuration issue, which live RAS must have already configured and
>>> nothing that is related to that has been changed in ACIS code, i hope.
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
>>>>> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>>>>>
>>>>> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
>>>>> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>>>>>
>>>>> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
>>>>> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except
>>>> that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
>>>>> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
>>>>> midnight time on nebka server.
>>>>>
>>>>> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
>>>>> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>>>>>
>>>>> -ivan
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>>> Economic Research
>>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>>> P.O. Box 442
>>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>> Economic Research
>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>> P.O. Box 442
>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Dec 12 15:08:27 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:08:27 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSTnW+5q7Z9HtVG9MH0DKwmkDJ0S3iYakBjEdmTM1S5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSTnW+5q7Z9HtVG9MH0DKwmkDJ0S3iYakBjEdmTM1S5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121508170.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Sure.

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian, may I use your live actual profile for testing things
> tomorrow after upgrade?
>
> I'll bring it back to its' current state after tests.
>
> -ivan
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>> But
>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/
>>> is not the same as
>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/
>>>
>>> The first was the one listed after confirmation.
>>
>> I understand. Still this is purely apache configuration issue. What's
>> important is: Does http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ reflect the
>> current state of the profile you've created?
>>
>>
>> -i
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good! The Keynes profile is available at
>>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ and that is an apache
>>>> configuration issue, which live RAS must have already configured and
>>>> nothing that is related to that has been changed in ACIS code, i hope.
>>>>
>>>> -ivan
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
>>>>>> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
>>>>>> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
>>>>>> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except
>>>>> that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
>>>>>> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
>>>>>> midnight time on nebka server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
>>>>>> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -ivan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>>>> Economic Research
>>>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>>>> P.O. Box 442
>>>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>> Economic Research
>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> P.O. Box 442
>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Mon Dec 12 15:14:01 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 15:14:01 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkSTnW+5q7Z9HtVG9MH0DKwmkDJ0S3iYakBjEdmTM1S5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSTnW+5q7Z9HtVG9MH0DKwmkDJ0S3iYakBjEdmTM1S5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121511370.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Re: the name variation check in the logs. I wonder how the following would 
have been flagged (case discovered just now in the live logs)

Kong Weng Ho with name variation K. Ho claimed a paper by Y. K. Ho

Would this be flagged as correct? It should not.

On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian, may I use your live actual profile for testing things
> tomorrow after upgrade?
>
> I'll bring it back to its' current state after tests.
>
> -ivan
>
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:05 PM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>> But
>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/
>>> is not the same as
>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/
>>>
>>> The first was the one listed after confirmation.
>>
>> I understand. Still this is purely apache configuration issue. What's
>> important is: Does http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ reflect the
>> current state of the profile you've created?
>>
>>
>> -i
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good! The Keynes profile is available at
>>>> http://ras.openlib.org/pro/p/k/e/1/ and that is an apache
>>>> configuration issue, which live RAS must have already configured and
>>>> nothing that is related to that has been changed in ACIS code, i hope.
>>>>
>>>> -ivan
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Christian Zimmermann
>>>> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 12 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In accord with what we have discussed previously, I want to and plan
>>>>>> to do upgrade RAS to the recent ACIS version tomorrow.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It is a good time for another round of testing of the version
>>>>>> installed at http://ras.openlib.org/ -- if anyone is available.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Specifically, it is very needed to test the new user registrations.
>>>>>> I'm not sure anyone has tried that at all on this version.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I tested the registration of John Maynard Keynes. It worked well, except
>>>>> that http://ras.openlib.org/pro/pke1/ is not found.
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If anyone helps me with testing, and no blocker issues are found, i'll
>>>>>> go on with the upgrade at about 9am UTC on Dev 13, which is about
>>>>>> midnight time on nebka server.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Basically, I'll wait for the end of the nightly script and start
>>>>>> upgrade. I'll plan the upgrade in more detail now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -ivan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> RAS-run mailing list
>>>>>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>>>>>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>>>> Economic Research
>>>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>>>> P.O. Box 442
>>>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
>>> Economic Research
>>> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
>>> P.O. Box 442
>>> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
>>> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Dec 13 05:22:44 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 13:22:44 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade, Dec 13 2011
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRuCpyvZQVLMe41iwJR-FdeaspTQorPoWbdW1ojppxhZw@mail.gmail.com>

hi all,

The upgrade went fine, so far. The new version of ACIS is online at
http://authors.repec.org/ for approx. 4 hours now, and it seems to be
running well.  I've enabled automatic profile update in a limited mode
(2 profiles per run, 4 profiles per hour).

Initially, i've found a number of small glitches and have fixed them.
I see lots of users coming in and modifying their profiles and leaving
the site. I don't see any issues or errors so far.

Update daemon seems to be working okay too. I'm still monitoring the
logs and checking this and that, but it seems ok.


-ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Dec 13 06:54:37 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 06:54:37 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRuCpyvZQVLMe41iwJR-FdeaspTQorPoWbdW1ojppxhZw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkRuCpyvZQVLMe41iwJR-FdeaspTQorPoWbdW1ojppxhZw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112130653510.19573@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Looks good indeed so far. The only complaint I may have is that I now also 
receive the ARPU emails. This is not really necessary.

On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> hi all,
>
> The upgrade went fine, so far. The new version of ACIS is online at
> http://authors.repec.org/ for approx. 4 hours now, and it seems to be
> running well.  I've enabled automatic profile update in a limited mode
> (2 profiles per run, 4 profiles per hour).
>
> Initially, i've found a number of small glitches and have fixed them.
> I see lots of users coming in and modifying their profiles and leaving
> the site. I don't see any issues or errors so far.
>
> Update daemon seems to be working okay too. I'm still monitoring the
> logs and checking this and that, but it seems ok.
>
>
> -ivan
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Dec 13 06:58:52 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:58:52 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112130653510.19573@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkRuCpyvZQVLMe41iwJR-FdeaspTQorPoWbdW1ojppxhZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112130653510.19573@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkT+OYoBLOY+vTdERtMx4dWcn7nm5XX2etzwBstqmcEpFg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> Looks good indeed so far. The only complaint I may have is that I now also
> receive the ARPU emails. This is not really necessary.

This is configurable, and i've switched this off now.

-i


>
>
> On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> hi all,
>>
>> The upgrade went fine, so far. The new version of ACIS is online at
>> http://authors.repec.org/ for approx. 4 hours now, and it seems to be
>> running well. ?I've enabled automatic profile update in a limited mode
>> (2 profiles per run, 4 profiles per hour).
>>
>> Initially, i've found a number of small glitches and have fixed them.
>> I see lots of users coming in and modifying their profiles and leaving
>> the site. I don't see any issues or errors so far.
>>
>> Update daemon seems to be working okay too. I'm still monitoring the
>> logs and checking this and that, but it seems ok.
>>
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RAS-run mailing list
>> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
>> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Thu Dec 15 06:13:18 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:13:18 +0200
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121511370.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSTnW+5q7Z9HtVG9MH0DKwmkDJ0S3iYakBjEdmTM1S5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121511370.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkR0OZ3Mmdr5r0epLTKz_Ak0ez3m9X4ynvoxq-Wr_jN5pQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> Re: the name variation check in the logs. I wonder how the following would
> have been flagged (case discovered just now in the live logs)
>
> Kong Weng Ho with name variation K. Ho claimed a paper by Y. K. Ho
>
> Would this be flagged as correct? It should not.

Right now it looks for a substring match in the authors list, and "K.
Ho" is a substring of "Y. K. Ho", so this is considered correct.

But it is easy to change. It can look for a match to a complete author
(editor) name. That is what you want here?


ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Thu Dec 15 08:57:44 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 08:57:44 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] RAS upgrade tomorrow, Dec 13 2011
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkR0OZ3Mmdr5r0epLTKz_Ak0ez3m9X4ynvoxq-Wr_jN5pQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkR+fkmwXoqYkEUtyBS+T_gZQnWph2_ZdiBWYwOGq2qLzg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121423180.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTNRsYduxQJxuwh7SV5m1FC5wPnJvXth5MyPZ64D+N+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121502200.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkTUR+La-izeb0aa_kJmLcwZZLUM3U-8vZfexphk1AeQPQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkSTnW+5q7Z9HtVG9MH0DKwmkDJ0S3iYakBjEdmTM1S5Mg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112121511370.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR0OZ3Mmdr5r0epLTKz_Ak0ez3m9X4ynvoxq-Wr_jN5pQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112150857150.6664@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

On Thu, 15 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Christian Zimmermann
> <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
>> Re: the name variation check in the logs. I wonder how the following would
>> have been flagged (case discovered just now in the live logs)
>>
>> Kong Weng Ho with name variation K. Ho claimed a paper by Y. K. Ho
>>
>> Would this be flagged as correct? It should not.
>
> Right now it looks for a substring match in the authors list, and "K.
> Ho" is a substring of "Y. K. Ho", so this is considered correct.
>
> But it is easy to change. It can look for a match to a complete author
> (editor) name. That is what you want here?
>

Yes, that would be good. Then I can concentrate on the flagged ones.

>
> ivan
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From duraley at gmail.com  Fri Dec 16 13:22:55 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:22:55 +0200
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkQ35A0r2xXDosuukGd0fsyPGC593a-Bo9ZWkg0rxyuQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR8x8-Ag4i2L7_JjY9PhkTH4sefx4BiXYESyv6ENXiYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161124300.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ35A0r2xXDosuukGd0fsyPGC593a-Bo9ZWkg0rxyuQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRFpvBq6==1EThQJaUNMsvNrXyfxjpHZsk0LEkpWvNaXg@mail.gmail.com>

Christian,

Please review the first implementation of affiliation shares at
http://ras.openlib.org/ . It is quite rough at SOME edges:

 - shares are not exported to redif
 - no total box
 - no confirmation shown when an affiliation is deleted or added or
when shares are modified
 - not well tested

With the Share column added the Delete button now depends on
JavaScript in the browser. They won't work when/if javascript is
disabled, but it should show a warning for that case.

-ivan

On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> label next to it. For example, in this mockup I use "Share:" as the
>>> label: http://www.screencast.com/t/qza127hJ0e
>>>
>>> Or we change the affiliations display to a table view and put those
>>> input boxes into a column, with the submit button below the column.
>>> http://www.screencast.com/t/cNotuQQJ8uc
>>
>> I like this second one more. It clusters less the left hand side.
>
> ok.
>
>>> (We probably need the percent sign (%) near the input boxes, or in the
>>> column title?)
>>>
>>> ? What would the input box label or the column label be?
>>> ? What label should the button have?
>>
>> They are OK as in the mockup. But I suggest adding at the bottom of the
>> column a "total" box, that adds up the shares, with a % sign. Javascript can
>> add the shares live, as I have seen elsewhere.
>
> Yes, and I like the idea.
>
>> Of course, what happens if someone does not have Javascript turned on?
>
> It would simply not react to share changes, or will be empty at all.
>
>>> User may change the numbers and submit the change by clicking the
>>> [Save share changes] button. Then we process the share values given
>>> and adjust it proportionally to a total of 100%. And we display the
>>> same screen with adjusted numbers and with the affiliations sorted in
>>> the order of decreasing share. Additionally, we show a confirmation
>>> message in the top part of the page, saying "The affiliation shares
>>> have been saved." or similar.
>>>
>>> ? Do we need such message? What text would you like to have there?
>>
>> Confirmation is always good.
>
> okay
>
>>> If the user has opened the affiliations page, has modified the Share
>>> value for one or more affiliations, but then clicked on the [Delete]
>>> button of some other affiliation, his change to the share values is
>>> not saved. We may show a confirmation dialog if he wants to submit the
>>> form without saving the share value.
>>>
>>> ? What should be the confirmation dialog text then? "The share
>>> changes will not be saved. [Cancel] [OK]"
>>
>> SOmething like "Please adjust shares after deletion"?
>
> hmm.
>
>>> ? Or alternatively, we could save the shares even in this case. Save
>>> the shares AND delete the affiliation at the same time. Is this
>>> better?
>>>
>>>
>>> ? Anything else to clarify or to consider?
>>
>> We may need an external link on or next to "Share" with some explanations. I
>> propose:
>>
>> "For multiple affiliations, please attribute a share to each. These will be
>> used to determine the main affiliation and allocate ranking scores across
>> affiliations. With affiliations in different regions or countries, your
>> ranking scores will also be weighted accordingly."
>
> okay.
>
> I think that's enough for a first implementation, and then we would
> iron out the details, if any.
>
>
> -ivan


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Fri Dec 16 16:30:09 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2011 16:30:09 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkRFpvBq6==1EThQJaUNMsvNrXyfxjpHZsk0LEkpWvNaXg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR8x8-Ag4i2L7_JjY9PhkTH4sefx4BiXYESyv6ENXiYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161124300.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ35A0r2xXDosuukGd0fsyPGC593a-Bo9ZWkg0rxyuQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFpvBq6==1EThQJaUNMsvNrXyfxjpHZsk0LEkpWvNaXg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112161628010.4140@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

Looks good. Does the way you implemented this actually require Javascript? 
It could be done without it, right?, as there is not total box. Clicking 
on "saving shares" rebalances as desired.

Also, I notice one cannot search for affiliation locations any more. 
Applies to live version as well.


On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:

> Christian,
>
> Please review the first implementation of affiliation shares at
> http://ras.openlib.org/ . It is quite rough at SOME edges:
>
> - shares are not exported to redif
> - no total box
> - no confirmation shown when an affiliation is deleted or added or
> when shares are modified
> - not well tested
>
> With the Share column added the Delete button now depends on
> JavaScript in the browser. They won't work when/if javascript is
> disabled, but it should show a warning for that case.
>
> -ivan
>
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> label next to it. For example, in this mockup I use "Share:" as the
>>>> label: http://www.screencast.com/t/qza127hJ0e
>>>>
>>>> Or we change the affiliations display to a table view and put those
>>>> input boxes into a column, with the submit button below the column.
>>>> http://www.screencast.com/t/cNotuQQJ8uc
>>>
>>> I like this second one more. It clusters less the left hand side.
>>
>> ok.
>>
>>>> (We probably need the percent sign (%) near the input boxes, or in the
>>>> column title?)
>>>>
>>>> ? What would the input box label or the column label be?
>>>> ? What label should the button have?
>>>
>>> They are OK as in the mockup. But I suggest adding at the bottom of the
>>> column a "total" box, that adds up the shares, with a % sign. Javascript can
>>> add the shares live, as I have seen elsewhere.
>>
>> Yes, and I like the idea.
>>
>>> Of course, what happens if someone does not have Javascript turned on?
>>
>> It would simply not react to share changes, or will be empty at all.
>>
>>>> User may change the numbers and submit the change by clicking the
>>>> [Save share changes] button. Then we process the share values given
>>>> and adjust it proportionally to a total of 100%. And we display the
>>>> same screen with adjusted numbers and with the affiliations sorted in
>>>> the order of decreasing share. Additionally, we show a confirmation
>>>> message in the top part of the page, saying "The affiliation shares
>>>> have been saved." or similar.
>>>>
>>>> ? Do we need such message? What text would you like to have there?
>>>
>>> Confirmation is always good.
>>
>> okay
>>
>>>> If the user has opened the affiliations page, has modified the Share
>>>> value for one or more affiliations, but then clicked on the [Delete]
>>>> button of some other affiliation, his change to the share values is
>>>> not saved. We may show a confirmation dialog if he wants to submit the
>>>> form without saving the share value.
>>>>
>>>> ? What should be the confirmation dialog text then? "The share
>>>> changes will not be saved. [Cancel] [OK]"
>>>
>>> SOmething like "Please adjust shares after deletion"?
>>
>> hmm.
>>
>>>> ? Or alternatively, we could save the shares even in this case. Save
>>>> the shares AND delete the affiliation at the same time. Is this
>>>> better?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ? Anything else to clarify or to consider?
>>>
>>> We may need an external link on or next to "Share" with some explanations. I
>>> propose:
>>>
>>> "For multiple affiliations, please attribute a share to each. These will be
>>> used to determine the main affiliation and allocate ranking scores across
>>> affiliations. With affiliations in different regions or countries, your
>>> ranking scores will also be weighted accordingly."
>>
>> okay.
>>
>> I think that's enough for a first implementation, and then we would
>> iron out the details, if any.
>>
>>
>> -ivan
>

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

From duraley at gmail.com  Sat Dec 17 03:46:51 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2011 11:46:51 +0200
Subject: [RAS] affiliations percentage
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112161628010.4140@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <CAHGiUkSmNeEodBOawYFCC9j5tOF07gVdkSaV13oUiCZyJWQdcA@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111131445010.31698@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR8x8-Ag4i2L7_JjY9PhkTH4sefx4BiXYESyv6ENXiYiQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1111161124300.22464@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkQ35A0r2xXDosuukGd0fsyPGC593a-Bo9ZWkg0rxyuQ8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHGiUkRFpvBq6==1EThQJaUNMsvNrXyfxjpHZsk0LEkpWvNaXg@mail.gmail.com>
 <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112161628010.4140@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkT+_GNORauRBXhxwb-fHxGhnsh97JhO79=soFCuX0v=tQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 12:30 AM, Christian Zimmermann
<zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> Looks good.

> Does the way you implemented this actually require Javascript?
> It could be done without it, right?, as there is not total box.

It does require JavaScript even without the total box.

Long story, but without it the form could delete an affiliation when
the user have just tried to edit the shares. And for that to happen
just this one simple thing has to happen: user enters an input box
with share numbers and presses Enter. That submits the form in the
same way, as if user clicked on a delete button of an affiliation. No
way for the software on the server to tell the difference. So,
client-side software comes to help.

> Clicking on
> "saving shares" rebalances as desired.

good!


> Also, I notice one cannot search for affiliation locations any more. Applies
> to live version as well.

This is something Thomas has removed in his version. I've put it back,
except for search instructions. Do we need the instructions?

-ivan

>
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011, Ivan Kurmanov wrote:
>
>> Christian,
>>
>> Please review the first implementation of affiliation shares at
>> http://ras.openlib.org/ . It is quite rough at SOME edges:
>>
>> - shares are not exported to redif
>> - no total box
>> - no confirmation shown when an affiliation is deleted or added or
>> when shares are modified
>> - not well tested
>>
>> With the Share column added the Delete button now depends on
>> JavaScript in the browser. They won't work when/if javascript is
>> disabled, but it should show a warning for that case.
>>
>> -ivan
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:58 AM, Ivan Kurmanov <duraley at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> label next to it. For example, in this mockup I use "Share:" as the
>>>>> label: http://www.screencast.com/t/qza127hJ0e
>>>>>
>>>>> Or we change the affiliations display to a table view and put those
>>>>> input boxes into a column, with the submit button below the column.
>>>>> http://www.screencast.com/t/cNotuQQJ8uc
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I like this second one more. It clusters less the left hand side.
>>>
>>>
>>> ok.
>>>
>>>>> (We probably need the percent sign (%) near the input boxes, or in the
>>>>> column title?)
>>>>>
>>>>> ? What would the input box label or the column label be?
>>>>> ? What label should the button have?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> They are OK as in the mockup. But I suggest adding at the bottom of the
>>>> column a "total" box, that adds up the shares, with a % sign. Javascript
>>>> can
>>>> add the shares live, as I have seen elsewhere.
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, and I like the idea.
>>>
>>>> Of course, what happens if someone does not have Javascript turned on?
>>>
>>>
>>> It would simply not react to share changes, or will be empty at all.
>>>
>>>>> User may change the numbers and submit the change by clicking the
>>>>> [Save share changes] button. Then we process the share values given
>>>>> and adjust it proportionally to a total of 100%. And we display the
>>>>> same screen with adjusted numbers and with the affiliations sorted in
>>>>> the order of decreasing share. Additionally, we show a confirmation
>>>>> message in the top part of the page, saying "The affiliation shares
>>>>> have been saved." or similar.
>>>>>
>>>>> ? Do we need such message? What text would you like to have there?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Confirmation is always good.
>>>
>>>
>>> okay
>>>
>>>>> If the user has opened the affiliations page, has modified the Share
>>>>> value for one or more affiliations, but then clicked on the [Delete]
>>>>> button of some other affiliation, his change to the share values is
>>>>> not saved. We may show a confirmation dialog if he wants to submit the
>>>>> form without saving the share value.
>>>>>
>>>>> ? What should be the confirmation dialog text then? "The share
>>>>> changes will not be saved. [Cancel] [OK]"
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> SOmething like "Please adjust shares after deletion"?
>>>
>>>
>>> hmm.
>>>
>>>>> ? Or alternatively, we could save the shares even in this case. Save
>>>>> the shares AND delete the affiliation at the same time. Is this
>>>>> better?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ? Anything else to clarify or to consider?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We may need an external link on or next to "Share" with some
>>>> explanations. I
>>>> propose:
>>>>
>>>> "For multiple affiliations, please attribute a share to each. These will
>>>> be
>>>> used to determine the main affiliation and allocate ranking scores
>>>> across
>>>> affiliations. With affiliations in different regions or countries, your
>>>> ranking scores will also be weighted accordingly."
>>>
>>>
>>> okay.
>>>
>>> I think that's enough for a first implementation, and then we would
>>> iron out the details, if any.
>>>
>>>
>>> -ivan
>>
>>
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/


From krichel at openlib.org  Sat Dec 24 13:14:10 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 20:14:10 +0100
Subject: [RAS] Invitation to Knowledge Exchange summit on Digital Author
 Identifiers - 13 and 14 March 2012, London]
Message-ID: <20111224191409.GB4851@openlib.org>


  I was invited to this meeting. I think RAS should be present
  there. I am not sure if I will go, as I think this type of
  event is quite useless, and they don't propose to refund travel.

  I have placed the attachements into 

http://openlib.org/home/krichel/meetings

----- Forwarded message from Knowledge Exchange Office <keo at bs.dk> -----

From: Knowledge Exchange Office <keo at bs.dk>
To: cordewener at surf.nl
Cc: Knowledge Exchange Office <keo at bs.dk>
Subject: Invitation to Knowledge Exchange summit on Digital Author Identifiers - 13 and 14 March 2012, London

Invitation to

Summit meeting on Digital Author Identifiers
13-14 March 2012, London

 

Dear sir/madam,
 
The Knowledge Exchange initiative has the pleasure of inviting you to a
two day summit meeting on Digital Author Identifiers to be held in
London on 13 and 14 March 2012.

 

Knowledge Exchange is a cooperative effort between four European
organisations that support the use and development of Information and
Communications Technologies infrastructure for higher education and
research. The four partners are Denmark's Electronic Research Library
(DEFF), the German Research Foundation (DFG), the Joint Information
Systems Committee (JISC) in the UK and the SURFfoundation in the
Netherlands. 

 

The objectives of this meeting are:

*	
	to share knowledge and experience and to exchange views on
desired developments 
*	
	to identify priority issues for technology, service and policy
development 
*	
	to explore and stimulate interoperability and common approaches 
*	
	to inform and support future planning - explore role KE can play

The themes or perspectives we would like to discuss are Governance,
Interoperability and Added Value.

Governance

What are the roles and responsibilities for international, national and
university players, and researchers? How do we achieve sustainability;
what business models are possible and acceptable?

 

Interoperability

How do particular solutions interoperate with other systems or
infrastructures? What are issues regarding data exchange? How can trust
between different providers/solutions be built? What are the major
hurdles to be taken before achieving interoperability, and what are the
consequences of not being interoperable? 

 

Added Value

How do/can our current  solution/systems improve the user experience?
What processes/communities could benefit, what problems could be
solved/what challenges met? What is needed to achieve these benefits?

 

A general challenge in all three themes is to identify the gaps, the
missing elements that prevent an optimal solution, that should be worked
on. And how can existing national, not-for-profit and commercial author
ID systems co-operate and strengthen each other?

 

Participation

Participants are invited from national and international organisations
working on author identifiers. They are asked to consider any of the
above perspectives in relation to the organisation or expertise they
represent. You will be given the opportunity to present your position,
perceived challenges and ambitions at the start of the workshop. This
overview will help us all to understand the important issues regarding
digital author identifiers. You will find a  suggested programme for the
workshop attached.

 

With this event Knowledge Exchange hopes to be a catalyst stimulating
integrated approaches towards transparent use of author identifiers. All
who share this view are invited to join. Attached you will find the list
of invitees. 

 

Registration

Could you please let us know whether you will be able to attend this
workshop before Monday 16 January 2012 by replying to this email. Please
could you also inform us if you are not able to attend. If you have any
questions regarding this workshop, please do not hesitate to contact us.

In January we will provide you with more practical details and a more
definite programme.

The workshop is free of charge and dinner will be paid for on the
evening of the 13th March 2012. Hotel, Travel and Subsistence will need
to covered by delegates. We will make hotel reservations for one night
(the night of 13 March, single room) for all invitees. Please also let
us know if you do not wish to have a hotel room reserved.

 

Kind regards,

 

Keith Russell

Knowledge Exchange Coordinator 

 

On behalf of Bas Cordewener

Chair of the Knowledge Exchange working group Interoperability of
Digital Repositories

 

Keith Russell
Knowledge Exchange Coordinator | www.knowledge-exchange.info
<http://www.knowledge-exchange.info>  | kru at knowledge-exchange.info
<mailto:kru at knowledge-exchange.info>  | Danish Agency for Libraries and
Media | H.C. Andersens Boulevard 2, 5th floor | DK-1553 Copenhagen V |
Denmark | T +31 (0)30 234 66 99 | F +31 (0)30 233 29 60 | 

 

Knowledge Exchange is a co-operative effort of DEFF (Denmark), DFG
(Germany), JISC (United Kingdom) and SURFfoundation (The Netherlands)

 







----- End forwarded message -----

-- 

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From zimmermann at stlouisfed.org  Tue Dec 27 17:41:06 2011
From: zimmermann at stlouisfed.org ('Christian Zimmermann')
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 17:41:06 -0600 (CST)
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>

What are these errors that suddenly pop up?

-- 
Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
Economic Research
Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
P.O. Box 442
St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:35:01 +0100
From: Cron Daemon <root at holda.openlib.org>
To: aras at holda.openlib.org
Subject: Cron <aras at holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
     /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log

Couldn't open :
No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 219
 	XML::Parser::parsefile('ACIS::Data::DumpXML::Parser=HASH(0x2898d00)', undef) called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/UserData.pm line 67
 	eval {...} called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/UserData.pm line 66
 	ACIS::Web::UserData::load('ACIS::Web::UserData', undef) called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session/SOldUser.pm line 261
 	ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::load_userdata_temp('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session/SOldUser.pm line 251
 	ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::userdata('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session.pm line 76
 	ACIS::Web::Session::current_record('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web.pm line 446
 	ACIS::Web::session('ACIS::Web=HASH(0x2873790)', 'ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Sessions.pm line 60
 	ACIS::Sessions::cleanup() called at /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up line 23
 	...propagated at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session.pm line 76.


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Tue Dec 27 18:43:31 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:43:31 -0600
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmUuMq0_rcefBoDHWmk+k96zsx8F8nmC-GhDn34hb8N8og@mail.gmail.com>

There wasn't a /usr/lib/perl5 directory but there was a /usr/lib64/perl5
directory, so I symbolically linked it to /usr/lib/perl5.  I'd assume that
will fix this error, but I doubt this is the technically correct way to fix
this.  I'll wait for Ivan or Thomas to comment.

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:

> What are these errors that suddenly pop up?
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:35:01 +0100
> From: Cron Daemon <root at holda.openlib.org>
> To: aras at holda.openlib.org
> Subject: Cron <aras at holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
>    /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log
>
> Couldn't open :
> No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 219
>        XML::Parser::parsefile('ACIS::**Data::DumpXML::Parser=HASH(**0x2898d00)',
> undef) called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**UserData.pm line 67
>        eval {...} called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**UserData.pm
> line 66
>        ACIS::Web::UserData::load('**ACIS::Web::UserData', undef) called
> at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**Session/SOldUser.pm line 261
>        ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::**load_userdata_temp('ACIS::Web:**
> :Session::SOldUser=HASH(**0x28b1110)') called at
> /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**Session/SOldUser.pm line 251
>        ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::**userdata('ACIS::Web::Session::**SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)')
> called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**Session.pm line 76
>        ACIS::Web::Session::current_**record('ACIS::Web::Session::**SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)')
> called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web.**pm line 446
>        ACIS::Web::session('ACIS::Web=**HASH(0x2873790)',
> 'ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=**HASH(0x28b1110)') called at
> /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/**Sessions.pm line 60
>        ACIS::Sessions::cleanup() called at /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up
> line 23
>        ...propagated at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/**Session.pm line 76.
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-**bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run<http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111227/6cd8c14c/attachment.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Tue Dec 27 20:19:15 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 03:19:15 +0100
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <20111228021915.GE20642@openlib.org>

  'Christian Zimmermann' writes
> What are these errors that suddenly pop up?


  As far as I can see, this is a message from the test system,
  not from RAS. 

  I am not sure what Ivan is working on with the test system.

> 
> -- 
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
> 
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:35:01 +0100
> From: Cron Daemon <root at holda.openlib.org>
> To: aras at holda.openlib.org
> Subject: Cron <aras at holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
>     /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log
> 
> Couldn't open :
> No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 219
> 	XML::Parser::parsefile('ACIS::Data::DumpXML::Parser=HASH(0x2898d00)', undef) called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/UserData.pm line 67
> 	eval {...} called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/UserData.pm line 66
> 	ACIS::Web::UserData::load('ACIS::Web::UserData', undef) called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session/SOldUser.pm line 261
> 	ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::load_userdata_temp('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session/SOldUser.pm line 251
> 	ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::userdata('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session.pm line 76
> 	ACIS::Web::Session::current_record('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web.pm line 446
> 	ACIS::Web::session('ACIS::Web=HASH(0x2873790)', 'ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Sessions.pm line 60
> 	ACIS::Sessions::cleanup() called at /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up line 23
> 	...propagated at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session.pm line 76.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run

-- 

  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From krichel at openlib.org  Tue Dec 27 20:28:55 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 03:28:55 +0100
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <CA+gnGmUuMq0_rcefBoDHWmk+k96zsx8F8nmC-GhDn34hb8N8og@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CA+gnGmUuMq0_rcefBoDHWmk+k96zsx8F8nmC-GhDn34hb8N8og@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111228022855.GF20642@openlib.org>

  Dan Hayes writes
> There wasn't a /usr/lib/perl5 directory but there was a /usr/lib64/perl5
> directory, so I symbolically linked it to /usr/lib/perl5. 

  On holda?


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From dhayes501 at gmail.com  Tue Dec 27 21:25:07 2011
From: dhayes501 at gmail.com (Dan Hayes)
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 21:25:07 -0600
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <20111228022855.GF20642@openlib.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CA+gnGmUuMq0_rcefBoDHWmk+k96zsx8F8nmC-GhDn34hb8N8og@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111228022855.GF20642@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CA+gnGmVG11yf=fXQUm7mZkwf0JcTUdNJ2HUxxw7xcryTLQbARQ@mail.gmail.com>

No, sorry.  I did that on nebka.  I didn't see that it was on a different
machine and just assumed...

On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

>  Dan Hayes writes
> > There wasn't a /usr/lib/perl5 directory but there was a /usr/lib64/perl5
> > directory, so I symbolically linked it to /usr/lib/perl5.
>
>   On holda?
>
>
>  Cheers,
>
>  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
>                                               skype: thomaskrichel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111227/f84fc272/attachment.html>

From duraley at gmail.com  Tue Dec 27 23:28:42 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 07:28:42 +0200
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkR8ZKKdO0t2t7MAtPJEDSQU+YXCj=TjeRWU_7wvNc239w@mail.gmail.com>

Christian,

This is me working on holds, Thomas is right.

I'll resolve this today, I hope, and these messages would stop.

Ivan

On Wednesday, December 28, 2011, Christian Zimmermann <
zimmermann at stlouisfed.org> wrote:
> What are these errors that suddenly pop up?
>
> --
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> http://ideas.repec.org/zimm/
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2011 23:35:01 +0100
> From: Cron Daemon <root at holda.openlib.org>
> To: aras at holda.openlib.org
> Subject: Cron <aras at holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
>    /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log
>
> Couldn't open :
> No such file or directory at /usr/lib/perl5/XML/Parser.pm line 219
>
 XML::Parser::parsefile('ACIS::Data::DumpXML::Parser=HASH(0x2898d00)',
undef) called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/UserData.pm line 67
>        eval {...} called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/UserData.pm line
66
>        ACIS::Web::UserData::load('ACIS::Web::UserData', undef) called at
/home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session/SOldUser.pm line 261
>
 ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::load_userdata_temp('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)')
called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session/SOldUser.pm line 251
>
 ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser::userdata('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)')
called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session.pm line 76
>
 ACIS::Web::Session::current_record('ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)')
called at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web.pm line 446
>        ACIS::Web::session('ACIS::Web=HASH(0x2873790)',
'ACIS::Web::Session::SOldUser=HASH(0x28b1110)') called at
/home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Sessions.pm line 60
>        ACIS::Sessions::cleanup() called at /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up
line 23
>        ...propagated at /home/aras/acis/lib/ACIS/Web/Session.pm line 76.
>
> _______________________________________________
> RAS-run mailing list
> RAS-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ras-run
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: </pipermail/ras-run/attachments/20111228/3fb85d3b/attachment-0001.html>

From krichel at openlib.org  Tue Dec 27 23:33:31 2011
From: krichel at openlib.org (Thomas Krichel)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 06:33:31 +0100
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <CAHGiUkR8ZKKdO0t2t7MAtPJEDSQU+YXCj=TjeRWU_7wvNc239w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR8ZKKdO0t2t7MAtPJEDSQU+YXCj=TjeRWU_7wvNc239w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20111228053331.GA20266@openlib.org>

  Ivan Kurmanov writes
> Christian,
> 
> This is me working on holds, Thomas is right.
> 
> I'll resolve this today, I hope, and these messages would stop.

  I can take CZ  off the alias.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                      http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
                                               skype: thomaskrichel


From duraley at gmail.com  Wed Dec 28 02:04:16 2011
From: duraley at gmail.com (Ivan Kurmanov)
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:04:16 +0200
Subject: [RAS] Cron <aras@holda> /home/aras/acis/bin/clean-up >>
 /home/aras/acis/clean-up.log (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <20111228053331.GA20266@openlib.org>
References: <alpine.LRH.2.02.1112271740360.23062@repec-mail.stlouisfed.org>
 <CAHGiUkR8ZKKdO0t2t7MAtPJEDSQU+YXCj=TjeRWU_7wvNc239w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20111228053331.GA20266@openlib.org>
Message-ID: <CAHGiUkRNPgKay6h-QbxmQXFkBm8FEF7GhfFBYUV_qQtOwuy0AA@mail.gmail.com>

I have done that now. And when/if you get fed up by these messages,
you may take yourself off it.

-i

On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 7:33 AM, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
> ?Ivan Kurmanov writes
>> Christian,
>>
>> This is me working on holds, Thomas is right.
>>
>> I'll resolve this today, I hope, and these messages would stop.
>
> ?I can take CZ ?off the alias.
>
>
> ?Cheers,
>
> ?Thomas Krichel ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://openlib.org/home/krichel
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?http://authorprofile.org/pkr1
> ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? skype: thomaskrichel


