[RAS] [CitEc] citation discrepancy

[Thomas Krichel]

  Jose Manuel Barrueco writes

> 
>  I've been looking at the possible causes of discrepancy between CitEc
> and RAS. May be a reason is how RAS deals with deleted handles. In
> today's log of data interchange RAS -> CitEc, we have this citation
> added by an author:
> 
> citing paper: repec:bis:bisbpc:22-15  
> citing reference: hsHKhhcrKCx1Wmzw5GLqng  
> cited paper: repec:jae:japmet:v:16:y:2001:i:4:p:487-520
> 
>  Such citation seems to be correct in RAS but hasn't been added to
> CitEc because the citing reference doesn't exist there. In fact the
> citing paper doesn't exist too (neither in IDEAS), it was deleted time
> ago.
> 
>  The question is, how deals RAS with deleted items (references,
> papers, citations.)?

  I don't know. I have not worked with the citation stuff. I am 
  at the moment working with another troublesome issue in ACIS.


  Cheers,

  Thomas Krichel                    http://openlib.org/home/krichel
                                RePEc:per:1965-06-05:thomas_krichel
                                               skype: thomaskrichel