[CollEc] Website fail

[Christian Düben]

Do you mean unweighted, when you say binary weighting? Two people are either coauthors or they are not?

On Friday, September 13th, 2024 at 15:53, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:

> 

> 

> Christian Düben writes
> 

> > What is the motivation for storing multiple paths per pair in the first place?
> 

> 

> Binary paths frequently have multiple minimum length. Without further
> criteria it is hard to say which one to show to the user as the most
> evident one.
> 

> > How about I export one path per pair and weighting function?
> 

> 

> If the weighing function is not binary, the result is likely to
> be meaningless to a user.
> 

> --
> Written by Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel on his 21651st day.
> 

> _______________________________________________
> CollEc-run mailing list
> CollEc-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/collec-run
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: publickey - cdueben.ml+repec at proton.me - 0xFA476413.asc
Type: application/pgp-keys
Size: 649 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/collec-run/attachments/20240913/8efaa6dd/attachment.asc>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/collec-run/attachments/20240913/8efaa6dd/attachment.sig>