[CoDeP] Food for thought
Thomas Krichel
krichel at openlib.org
Sat Nov 5 13:55:07 UTC 2016
BOUNADER Lahcen writes
> it is more important to think about some real actions
Yes, and real actions can take several forms, that are basically of
two different type. "additive" for lack of a better word, let alone
acronym, will mean we issue a note, in a machine readable form, to
be added ed to RePEc data, that the outlet is deceptive.
"subtractive" actions means asking a RePEc official to delete
records from RePEc, so the offending publisher is not part of the
data anymore. The attentive reader will have noted that the additive
measure concerns an outlet, while the subtractive, for technical
reasons, can only be applied to a publisher as a whole, meaning it
will hit all outlets by this publisher.
So simply talking about a binary decision, as I did in the
beginning of this discussion, is oversimplifying.
--
Cheers,
Thomas Krichel http://openlib.org/home/krichel
skype:thomaskrichel
More information about the CoDeP-run
mailing list