[CoDeP] Food for thought

[Jorge Miguel Streb]

The comments are very interesting. What the comments suggest is that Beall has
at times misclassified some journals as predatory. 

That problem can be prevented by (i) having CoDeP contact the journal before
it is listed as predatory, and (ii) giving them the possibility of responding
to the charges before it is listed as such.

Kind regards,

Jorge


---------- Original Message -----------
From: "'Christian Zimmermann'" <zimmermann at stlouisfed.org>
To: Committee on Deceptive Publishing <codep-run at lists.openlib.org>
Sent: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 20:49:04 -0500 (CDT)
Subject: [CoDeP] Food for thought

> See 
> http://retractionwatch.com/2016/10/27/even-top-economists-publish-in-
> predatory-journals-study-finds/ and http://www.env-
> econ.net/2016/10/even-top-economists-publish-in-predatory-journals-
> study-finds-repec.html
> 
> Note especially the comments for the first one.
> 
> Christian Zimmermann                          FIGUGEGL!
> Economic Research
> Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
> P.O. Box 442
> St. Louis MO 63166-0442 USA
> https://ideas.repec.org/zimm/   @CZimm_economist
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CoDeP-run mailing list
> CoDeP-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/codep-run
------- End of Original Message -------