[CoDeP] R: the Betham case

[GORI STEFANO (RI)]

After a thorough analysis of their publications I also object the acceptance of Bentham Journals.
bye
Stefano

-----Messaggio originale-----
Da: CoDeP-run [mailto:codep-run-bounces at lists.openlib.org] Per conto di Dr. Olowa Olatomide
Inviato: martedì 20 dicembre 2016 10:56
A: Thomas; Christopher
Cc: Committee
Oggetto: Re: [CoDeP] the Betham case

I object acceptance of Bentham journals, as it doesn't have the clear economic contents required to be enlisted on repec at all.  Even the tech transfer edition is about 99% tilted to tech/Science. How then would repec platform cast on it archival statuses it seeks without being trivialised. On Dec 19, 2016 21:29, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>
>   Christopher Baum writes
>
> > OK, the same person requested archives on 9 Dec for Bentham Science Publishers ( http://benthamscience.com/journals-by-title/A/1/)  and Bentham Open ( https://benthamopen.com/browse-by-title/A/1/). Do you advise that we should accept Bentham as a publisher?
> >
>
>   Yes, and tell them we only want that tech tranfer journal. We saw
>   nothing interesting for us in Bentham Open.
>
>
> --
>
>   Cheers,
>
>   Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel
>                                               skype:thomaskrichel
>
> _______________________________________________
> CoDeP-run mailing list
> CoDeP-run at lists.openlib.org
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/codep-run
_______________________________________________
CoDeP-run mailing list
CoDeP-run at lists.openlib.org
http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/codep-run

La presente comunicazione elettronica contiene informazioni aziendali non private. Eventuali risposte alla presente potrebbero essere conosciute, per motivi organizzativi e di sicurezza, dal personale di Poste Italiane S.p.A.