[CoDeP] the Betham case

[Dr. Olowa Olatomide]

I object acceptance of Bentham journals, as it doesn't have the clear economic contents required to be enlisted on repec at all.  Even the tech transfer edition is about 99% tilted to tech/Science. How then would repec platform cast on it archival statuses it seeks without being trivialised. On Dec 19, 2016 21:29, Thomas Krichel <krichel at openlib.org> wrote:
>
>   Christopher Baum writes 
>
> > OK, the same person requested archives on 9 Dec for Bentham Science Publishers ( http://benthamscience.com/journals-by-title/A/1/)  and Bentham Open ( https://benthamopen.com/browse-by-title/A/1/). Do you advise that we should accept Bentham as a publisher? 
> > 
>
>   Yes, and tell them we only want that tech tranfer journal. We saw 
>   nothing interesting for us in Bentham Open. 
>
>
> -- 
>
>   Cheers, 
>
>   Thomas Krichel                  http://openlib.org/home/krichel 
>                                               skype:thomaskrichel 
>
> _______________________________________________ 
> CoDeP-run mailing list 
> CoDeP-run at lists.openlib.org 
> http://lists.openlib.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/codep-run