[cgiapp] proposal for new cgiapp hook: loaded_html_tmpl

[Alex]

Hi!

Mostly the same here. I like it for testing and the only reason I can think
of why it should be disabled is that you want to avoid setting params
specific for your template.
I kind of like the strict behavior on a second way: it remind me of "use
strict" with scopes 'n stuff, but that may be just a subjective preference.

Hth, Alex

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: cgiapp-bounces at lists.openlib.org
[mailto:cgiapp-bounces at lists.openlib.org] Im Auftrag von ron at savage.net.au
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 11. November 2009 03:30
An: CGI Application
Betreff: Re: [cgiapp] proposal for new cgiapp hook: loaded_html_tmpl

Hi Mark

Quoting "Mark Stosberg" <mark at summersault.com>:

> To proceed, I'd like to hear at least a small chorus of voices  
> claiming that the they use
> the die_on_bad_params feature.

I always use it, since in testing I want to know immediately if there  
is a problem.

I assume those who don't use it do so in order to avoid having to set  
every parameter in the template. Is that right?


#####  CGI::Application community mailing list  ################
##                                                            ##
##  To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options,  ##
##  visit:  http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp    ##
##                                                            ##
##  Web archive:   http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/cgiapp/   ##
##  Wiki:          http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/                 ##
##                                                            ##
################################################################
Eingehende eMail ist virenfrei.
Von AVG überprüft - www.avg.de 
Version: 9.0.704 / Virendatenbank: 270.14.59/2494 - Ausgabedatum: 11/10/09
08:38:00