[cgiapp] Re: CGI::Application::Server patches now peer reviewed and
recommended (was: Re: ::Server vs ::Dispatch::Server:
Worth having both?)
Mark Stosberg
mark at summersault.com
Sat Nov 1 22:15:50 EDT 2008
On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 21:29:55 -0400
Ricardo SIGNES <perl.cgiapp at rjbs.manxome.org> wrote:
> * Mark Stosberg <mark at summersault.com> [2008-09-23T23:07:34]
> > > I realized that I left some of the original code commented out in the
> > > static-content.patch branch. I cleaned it up, tested it again,
> > > updated the copy at http://shrimp.alerce.com/cgiapp, and have attached
> > > the cleaner copy here for posterity.
> >
> > I've peer-reviewed all the patches here and recommend them all for inclusion,
> > with no further modifications. George has already included additional
> > automated tests for the key functionality. The only bit I see left to do is
> > to update the 'Changes' file.
>
> I'll try and get these applied, reviewed, and released in the next 2-3 weeks.
> Time is tight.
Ricardo,
I'm willing to be a CO-MAINT for CGI::Application::Server, if that would help
move this along. I know you have dozens of other modules you maintain that
could keep you busy.
Mark
--
http://mark.stosberg.com/blog/
More information about the cgiapp
mailing list