[cgiapp] Question | Poll - Preferred ORM.

[Porta]

Thanks to all for the feedback.
It seems that, basically, it's between Rose::DB::Object and DBIx::Class.
So far, RDO looks more like what I need, but a bit complex.

Would you like to see a new ORM in cpan, more simpler?

On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 1:50 AM, George Hartzell <hartzell at alerce.com> wrote:
> Benjamin Hitz writes:
>  >
>  > We have begun a conversion from an old, hand rolled "ORM" to
>  > DBIx::Class.  There are lots of nice properties, but our DB has 120-
>  > odd tables, and the start up time is killing us (ca. 2sec.).
>  > Hopefully, we can resolve the speed issue with PersistantPerl and/or
>  > FCGI, but I will be investigating a switch over to Rose::DB.
>
> Does each request need all (or some unpredictable subset) of the
> tables?  Could you get away with loading them on demand (or loading a
> subset in a sub-app)?
>
> g.
>
> #####  CGI::Application community mailing list  ################
> ##                                                            ##
> ##  To unsubscribe, or change your message delivery options,  ##
> ##  visit:  http://lists.openlib.org/mailman/listinfo/cgiapp    ##
> ##                                                            ##
> ##  Web archive:   http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/cgiapp/   ##
> ##  Wiki:          http://cgiapp.erlbaum.net/                 ##
> ##                                                            ##
> ################################################################
>
>