[ArchEc] Report for RePEc_2009-04-05.tar.gz

[Rishabh Sharma]

So, should i continue with next tarball
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 8:20 PM, Rishabh Sharma <anantyarnd at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>   last tamie you did 2008-03, now 2009-04? The dumps have to
>>   be processed in time order. Plesae start again. Just do a
>>   loop that processes all of them.
>>
>>
> Here is the list of tar balls in data/tarballs
> RePEc_2007-02-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-04-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-10-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2007-03-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-05-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-11-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2007-04-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-06-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-12-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2007-05-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-07-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-01-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2008-02-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-08-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-02-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2008-03-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-09-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-03-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-04-05.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-10-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-04-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-05-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-11-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-05-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-06-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2010-12-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-06-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-07-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-01-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-07-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-08-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-02-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-08-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-09-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-03-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-09-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-10-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-04-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-10-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-11-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-05-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2012-11-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2009-12-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-06-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2013-02-25.tar.gz
> RePEc_2010-01-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-07-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2013-03-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2010-02-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-08-01.tar.gz
> RePEc_2010-03-01.tar.gz  RePEc_2011-09-01.tar.gz
>
>
> I going in time order.
> they can be looped but chances of error is more as directory structure in
> each tarball is different. So its better to do one by one.
>
>
>
> --
> Rishabh Sharma
> Software Developer
> Anantya R&D
> http://www.anantyarnd.in
>



-- 
Rishabh Sharma
Software Developer
Anantya R&D
http://www.anantyarnd.in
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openlib.org/pipermail/archec-run/attachments/20130321/9f91727e/attachment.html>